Successful change management relies on having the right metrics to measure progress, gauge impact, and communicate with stakeholders. Moreover, the right metrics can drive continuous improvement and help directly achieve change outcomes. However, not all metrics are beneficial, and some can mislead or fail to meet stakeholder needs. Let’s check out the top change management metrics to avoid and go through examples to take note.
Understanding the Disconnect: Change Managers vs. Business Stakeholders
A significant reason certain change management metrics fall short is the differing perspectives between change managers and business stakeholders. Change managers are trained to view metrics through the lens of change management frameworks and methodologies, focusing on detailed assessments and structured approaches. These include applying ratings and judgments on aspects such as impact levels.
In contrast, business stakeholders prioritize business operations, strategic outcomes, and practical implications. The busy business stakeholder is often looking for practical implications from metrics that can be used to directly drive decision making, meaning “what do I do with this data to improve the ultimate business outcome”.
Of course, different stakeholder have different data needs, and you need to show the right metric to the right type of stakeholder. For example, operations focused stakeholders expect fairly detailed metrics and data and what that means in terms of organisation, coordination, capacity and performance perspectives. Senior managers may prefer higher level data with focus on strategic impacts, overall progress and adoption indicators.
This disconnect can lead to the use of metrics that do not resonate with or are misunderstood by stakeholders.
Metrics from a Change Manager’s Perspective
Change managers may leverage metrics that are derived from the various change management documents such impact assessments, training plan or communications plan. Metrics also often chosen for ease of use and ideally are not overly complicated to execute.
For example, impact assessments typically involve rating stakeholder groups and initiatives on a traffic light system (red, amber, green) based on their impact. While this approach is systematic, it can be problematic for several reasons:
Lack of Sufficient Stakeholder Context: Business stakeholders might not understand the practical implications of these ratings. For instance, an “impact rating per initiative” may not clearly convey what the rating means for day-to-day operations or strategic goals. For example, if an initiative has a red impact rating, stakeholders might not grasp the specific operational changes or strategic adjustments needed, in essence, “what do I do with this?”.
Misinterpretation of Traffic Light Ratings: The red, amber, green system can be misleading. Stakeholders might interpret red as an indicator of alarm or imminent risk, while green may be seen as a sign that no action is needed. This is because stakeholders are trained to interpret traffic light ratings this way (from the various project/business updates they’ve attended). In reality, red might simply mean high impact, requiring focused attention, and green might indicate a low impact but still require monitoring. For instance, a red rating might indicate significant process changes that need careful management, not necessarily a negative outcome.
Hard to defend ratings if prompted: Business stakeholders may also want to drill into how the ratings are determined, and based on what basis. They may expect a logical data-backed reasoning of how each colour scheme is determined. If a rating is based on an overall ‘personal judgment’ this may be hard to defend infront of a group of stakeholders.
Examples of Potentially Misleading Metrics
Certain metrics, although straightforward, can be easily misinterpreted and fail to provide a realistic picture of change impacts. Often these are selected because they are easy to report on. However, easy, make not give you the outcome you are looking for.
Number of Go-Lives: Tracking the number of Go-Lives over time might seem like an effective way to represent change volume. However, the most significant impacts on people often occur before or after the Go-Live date. For example, the preparation and training phase before Go-Live and the adoption phase afterward are critical periods that this metric overlooks. A Go-Live date might indicate a milestone but not the challenges, progress or impacts faced during the implementation phase.
Number of Activities Implemented: Similar to Go-Lives, this metric focuses on quantity rather than quality. Simply counting the number of activities does not account for their effectiveness or the actual change they drive within the organisation. For example, reporting that 50 training sessions were conducted does not reveal whether employees found them helpful or if they led to improved performance.
Number of impacts or stakeholders impacted: Again, using a numerical way to indicate progress can be very misleading, or unmeaningful. This is because it may be ‘interesting’ but with no real action for your stakeholder to take in order to somehow lead to a better overall change outcome. If metrics do not result in some kind of action, then over time it will not shape your change(s) toward the targeted outcomes. Or worse, your stakeholders may lose interest and lose confidence in the strategic impact of these metrics.
Another common way to report change metrics is to use the number of impacts or number of stakeholders impacted. This can be in terms of the following:
Number of divisions impacted
Number of stakeholder groups impacted
Number of employees impacted
Number of initiatives per division/stakeholder
Metrics That May Be Too Operational
Metrics that are overly operational can fail to capture meaningful progress or adoption. Perhaps if the metric are for reporting within the Change Management team that may be OK. However, when you are showing metrics to stakeholders, a different set of expectations should be cast.
If you are presenting metrics to senior managers, you need to ensure that they hit the mark for that audience group. If the group is more interested in strategic impact, and higher level progress outcomes, you need to tailor accordingly.
Examples of metrics that may be too operational include:
Number of Communications Sent: This metric measures activity but not effectiveness. Sending numerous emails or messages does not guarantee that the message is received, understood, or acted upon by stakeholders. For instance, stakeholders might receive 100 emails, but if the content is unclear, the communication effort is wasted. Or worse, the emails may not even have been read.
Number of Training Sessions Attended: This one is a classic. While training is crucial, the number of sessions attended does not necessarily reflect the attendees’ understanding, engagement, or the practical application of the training. For example, employees might attend training but not apply the new skills if the training is not relevant to their roles for various reasons.
Number of workshops/meetings: Another way of articulating the change management progress in terms of activities is the number of workshops or meetings conducted with stakeholders. Again, this may be good to track within the change management team. However, presenting this metric to stakeholders may not be appropriate as it may not mee their needs.
The way metrics are presented is just as important as the metrics themselves. Poor visualization can lead to misinterpretation, confusion, and misguided decisions. Here are some common pitfalls to avoid:
Ineffective Use of Pie Charts
Pie charts can be misleading when used to show data points that are not significantly different. For example, using a pie chart to represent the percentage of divisions impacted by a change might not effectively communicate the nuances of the impact if the differences between the divisions are minimal. A pie chart showing 45%, 30%, and 25% might not convey the critical differences in impact levels among divisions.
Misleading Traffic Light Ratings
Using red, amber, and green to indicate high, medium, and low impacts can send the wrong message. Stakeholders might associate these colours with good and bad outcomes rather than understanding the actual levels of impact. Stakeholder may be used to interpreting these in the context of their usual project or business updates where red indicated alarm and ‘bad’. This can lead to unnecessary alarm or complacency. For instance, a green rating might suggest no need for action, while in reality, it might require ongoing monitoring.
Overuse of Colours
Using too many colours in charts and graphs can overwhelm stakeholders, making it difficult to discern the key message. Using colours in data visualisation can be two-edged sword. Colour can effectively point your stakeholders are the area where you want them to focus on. But, too many colours can lose your audience. A cluttered visual can obscure the critical data points and lead to misinterpretation. For example, a graph with ten different colours can confuse stakeholders about which data points are most important.
Practical Takeaways for Senior Change Managers
To ensure that change management metrics are effective, consider the following practical takeaways:
Align Metrics with Stakeholder Perspectives
Understand Stakeholder Priorities: Engage with stakeholders to understand their priorities and concerns. Tailor your metrics to address these aspects directly. For example, if stakeholders are concerned about operational efficiency, focus on metrics that reflect improvements in this area.
Use Business Language: Frame your metrics in a way that resonates with business stakeholders. Avoid change management jargon and reference, and ensure that the implications of the metrics are clear and actionable. For example, instead of using technical terms, explain how the metrics impact business outcomes. Think in terms of business activities, milestones, busy periods, and capacity challenges.
Focus on Meaningful Metrics
Measure Outcomes, Not Just Activities: Prioritize metrics that reflect the outcomes and impacts of change, rather than just the activities performed. For example, instead of counting the number of training sessions, measure the improvement in employee performance or knowledge retention post-training.
Example: Instead of reporting that 100 employees attended training sessions, report that 85% of attendees showed improved performance in their roles after training, or that certain level of competencies were gained.
Track Engagement and Adoption: Monitor metrics that indicate the level of engagement and adoption among stakeholders. This could include surveys, feedback forms, or direct measures of behaviour change.
Example: Use post-training surveys to measure employee confidence in applying new skills or managerial rating of application of learnt skills. Track the percentage of employees who actively use new tools or processes introduced during the change.
Improve Metric Visualization
Simplify Visuals: Use clear, simple visuals that highlight the key messages. Avoid clutter and ensure that the most important data points stand out.
Example: Use bar charts or line graphs to show trends over time rather than pie charts that can be harder to interpret.
Contextualize Data: Provide context for the data to help stakeholders understand the significance. For example, instead of just showing the number of Go-Lives, explain what each Go-Live entails and its expected impact on operations. Or better, focus on showing the varying levels of impact on different stakeholders across time within the initiative.
Example: Accompany a Go-Live count with a visual showing the varying impact level of various implementation activities of the changes.
Narrative Approach: Combine metrics with a narrative that explains the story behind the numbers. This can help stakeholders understand the broader context and implications.
Example: Instead of presenting raw data, provide a summary that explains key trends, successes, and areas needing attention.
Educate your stakeholders: Depending on stakeholder needs you may need to take them on a phased approach to gradually educate them on change management metrics and how you ultimately want them to drive the outcomes.
Example: You may start the education process to focus on more simplistic and easy-to-understand measures, and as your stakeholders are more change-mature, move to drill into more detailed metrics that explain the ‘why’ and ‘how’ to drive outcome success.
Continuously improvement: Provide regular updates on key metrics and adjust them based on feedback from stakeholders. Continuous communication ensures that everyone remains aligned and informed.
Example: Hold monthly review meetings with stakeholders to discuss the latest metrics, address concerns, and adjust strategies as needed.
Examples of Effective Metrics
Employee Adoption and Engagement
Percentage of Employees Adopting New Process/System: This metric measures the rate at which employees are using new processes or systems introduced during the change. High adoption rates indicate successful integration.
Implementation: Use software usage analytics or surveys to track tool adoption rates.
Visualization: A graph showing adoption rates over time.
Employee Feedback Scores: Collect feedback on change initiatives through surveys or stakeholder ratings to measure sentiment/feedback and identify areas for improvement.
Implementation: Conduct regular surveys asking employees about their experience with the change process. Do note that depending on the change you may expect negative feedback due to the nature of the change itself (vs the way it was implemented).
Visualization: Bar/Line charts comparing feedback scores across different departments or time periods. Bar/Line charts are the standard go-to for data visualisation. They are easy to understand and interpret.
Impact on Business Outcomes
Improvement in Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Track changes in KPIs that are directly impacted by the change initiatives, such as productivity, customer satisfaction, or financial performance.
Implementation: Identify relevant KPIs and measure their performance before and after change initiatives.
Visualization: Use line/bar graphs to show trends in KPI performance over time.
Operational Efficiency Metrics: Measure improvements in operational processes, such as reduced cycle times, error rates, or cost savings.
Implementation: Track specific operational metrics relevant to the change initiatives.
Visualization: Bar charts or heatmaps showing improvements in efficiency metrics across different operational areas.
Effective change management requires metrics that not only measure progress but also resonate with business stakeholders and accurately reflect the impact of change initiatives. Avoiding common pitfalls such as relying on easily misinterpreted or overly operational metrics is crucial. By aligning metrics with stakeholder perspectives, focusing on meaningful outcomes, improving visualization, and communicating effectively, senior change and transformation professionals can ensure that their metrics truly support the success of their change initiatives.
The top change management metrics to avoid are those that fail to provide clear, actionable insights to business stakeholders. By understanding and addressing the disconnect between change managers and business stakeholders, and by prioritizing metrics that truly reflect the impact and progress of change, you can drive more effective and successful change management efforts by influencing your stakeholders in your organisation.
Chat with us if you would like to discuss more about leveraging AI and technology to generate high-impact change management metrics and data for your stakeholders, both at project and portfolio levels.
Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) has emerged as a leading methodology to address organisational change demands of fostering flexibility, collaboration, and continuous improvement. A cornerstone of SAFe is the principle of “Measure and Grow,” which emphasizes using data and fact-based decisions to enhance change outcomes over time. Despite its centrality, SAFe does not explicitly detail the change management components essential for its success. Here we outline how change management practitioners can effectively apply the “Measure and Grow” principle to lead change and improve outcomes to support the Scaled Agile environment.
The “Measure and Grow” Principle in Scaled Agile
“Measure and Grow” is integral to SAFe, focusing on systematic measurement and continuous improvement. By leveraging data and analytics, organizations can make informed decisions, identify areas needing attention, and iteratively enhance performance. For change management professionals, this principle translates into a structured approach to evaluate the effectiveness of change initiatives, pinpoint areas for improvement, and implement necessary adjustments.
In a Scaled Agile environment, “Measure and Grow” is a core tenant or principle that applies in all types of agile environments. By continuously assessing and refining change efforts, organizations can align their initiatives with strategic objectives, mitigate risks, and ensure sustained success.
In practice, a lot of organisations have not pinpointed exactly how change management measures can make or break the outcome of the change, and in a SAFe environment, across the program, portfolio as well as enterprise.
The ‘Measure and Grow’ principle as a core part of SAFe (From Scaled Agile Framework)
Key Elements of Measuring and Growing Change Outcomes
To operationalize the “Measure and Grow” principle in change management, it is crucial to establish a set of metrics and assessment frameworks. Here are some broad categories of different types of change measurements that are relevant. Note that since we are talking about SAFe, it is not just at the initiative level that we are talking about metrics. More importantly, it is about establishing a system to promote change improvement across the organisation.
Change Management KPIs and OKRs
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) are essential tools for tracking the success of change management initiatives. KPIs provide quantitative measures of performance, while OKRs align change efforts with broader organizational goals. A change management stream or function should focus on establishing KPIs or OKRs to achieve laser focus on achieving change outcomes.
Examples of Initiative-Level Change Management KPIs that may roll out to form portfolio views
Employee Engagement Levels: This KPI assesses how change impacts employee morale and engagement, providing insight into the overall acceptance and support of the change initiative.
Learning Achievement Rates: This can include tracking the percentage of employees who have completed necessary training programs, as well as achieving the target level of competence to ensure that the workforce is adequately prepared for the change.
Feedback Scores: Collecting feedback from stakeholders through surveys or feedback forms helps gauge perception and identify areas needing improvement. It is important to note that depending on the change context, stakeholders may not be happy with the content of the change. However, understanding and tracking this perception is still important.
Change Adoption Rate: This KPI measures the percentage of stakeholders who have adopted the change. High adoption rates are the ultimate goal for initiatives.
Issue Resolution Time: Measuring the time taken to resolve user-related issues related to the change highlights the efficiency of support mechanisms and the responsiveness of the change management team. This is especially important during an agile environment where there may be constant changes.
Change Readiness and Stakeholder Engagement Metrics
Evaluating change readiness and stakeholder engagement is crucial to the success of any change initiative. These metrics help assess the organization’s preparedness for change and the level of involvement and support from key stakeholders. Readiness and engagement rates can also roll up at a portfolio level to provide oversight.
Change Readiness Metrics
Readiness Assessments: Conduct surveys or interviews to gauge the organization’s preparedness for the impending change. This can include evaluating awareness, understanding, and acceptance of the change.
Resource Availability: Measure the availability of necessary resources, such as budget, personnel, and tools, to support the change initiative.
Communication Effectiveness: Assess the clarity, frequency, and effectiveness of communication regarding the change to ensure stakeholders are well-informed and engaged.
Stakeholder Engagement Metrics
Engagement Scores: Use surveys or feedback forms to measure the engagement levels of stakeholders, indicating their commitment and support for the change.
Participation Rates: Track stakeholder participation in change-related activities, such as workshops, meetings, and training sessions, to gauge their involvement.
Influence and Support: Assess the influence and support of key stakeholders in driving the change, ensuring that influential figures are actively endorsing the initiative.
By monitoring these metrics, change management professionals can identify potential barriers to change and take proactive steps to enhance readiness and engagement.
Stakeholder Competency Assessment
Successful change initiatives rely on the competence and readiness of key stakeholders. Assessing stakeholder competency involves evaluating the capability of sponsors and change champions to support and drive the change.
Sponsor Readiness/Capability Assessment
Sponsor Engagement: Measure the level of engagement and commitment from sponsors, ensuring they are actively involved and supportive of the change.
Decision-Making Effectiveness: Assess the ability of sponsors to make timely and effective decisions that facilitate the change process.
Resource Allocation: Evaluate the sponsor’s ability to allocate necessary resources, such as budget and personnel, to support the change initiative.
Change Champion Capability Assessment
Training and Knowledge: Measure the knowledge and training levels of change champions to ensure they are well-equipped to support the change.
Communication Skills: Assess the ability of change champions to effectively communicate the change message and address stakeholder concerns.
Influence and Leadership: Evaluate the influence and leadership capabilities of change champions, ensuring they can effectively drive and sustain the change.
By conducting these assessments, change management professionals can ensure that key stakeholders are prepared and capable of supporting the change initiative.
Change Adoption Metrics
Change adoption metrics provide insight into how well the change has been accepted and integrated into the organization. These metrics help assess the effectiveness of the change initiative and identify areas for improvement. At a portfolio level, there may be different levels of change adoption set for different initiatives depending on priority and complexity.
Key Change Adoption Metrics
Adoption Rate: Measure the percentage of stakeholders who have adopted the change, indicating the overall acceptance and integration of the new processes or systems.
Usage Metrics: Track the usage of new tools, processes, or systems introduced by the change to ensure they are being utilized as intended.
Performance Metrics: Assess the impact of the change on key performance indicators, such as productivity, efficiency, and quality, to determine the overall success of the change initiative.
By monitoring these metrics, change management professionals can gauge the success of the change initiative and identify opportunities for further improvement. To read more about change adoption metrics check out The Comprehensive Guide to Change Management Metrics for Adoption.
Change Impact and Capacity Metrics
Understanding the impact of change and the organization’s capacity to manage it is crucial for successful change management. Change impact metrics assess the effects of the change on the organization, while capacity metrics evaluate the organization’s ability to manage and sustain the change.
Change Impact Metrics
Aggregate impacts: Aggregate impacts across initiatives to form a view of how various teams and roles are impacted by various changes.
Risk Assessments: Identify potential risks associated with the change and evaluate their impact, ensuring that mitigation strategies are in place. A particular focus should be placed on business performance during change, across initiatives.
Capacity Metrics
Resource Capacity: Assess the availability of resources, such as personnel, budget, and tools, to support the change initiative.
Change Fatigue: Measure the risk for potential fatigue within the organization and its impact on stakeholders, ensuring that change initiatives are paced and driven appropriately.
Support Structures: Evaluate the effectiveness of support structures, such as training programs, information hubs, and help desks, in facilitating the change. Support structures may also include change champion networks.
By assessing change impact and capacity, change management practitioners can ensure that the organization is well-equipped to manage and sustain the change initiative.
Change Maturity Assessment
Change maturity assessments provide a comprehensive evaluation of the organization’s capability to manage change effectively. These assessments help identify strengths and weaknesses in the organization’s change management practices and provide a roadmap for improvement.
The Change Management Institute (CMI) Change Maturity Model is a comprehensive framework that takes a holistic approach to enhancing an organization’s change management maturity. It’s divided into three core functional domains, each playing a vital role in the overall journey toward maturity:
Project Change Management
Business Change Readiness
Strategic Change Leadership.
These domains serve as the foundation for achieving higher levels of maturity within the organization.
Within each of these domains, the CMI model outlines a structured path, consisting of five distinct maturity levels. These levels represent a continuum, starting at Level 1, which serves as the foundational stage, and progressing all the way to Level 5, the zenith of maturity and effectiveness. This multi-tiered approach offers organizations a clear roadmap for growth and development, ensuring that they have the tools and insights necessary to navigate the complexities of change management.
By conducting regular change maturity assessments, change management professionals can identify areas for improvement and develop targeted strategies to enhance the organization’s change management capability.
The “Measure and Grow” principle is a powerful tool for improving change outcomes in a Scaled Agile environment. By leveraging data and fact-based decision-making, change management professionals can ensure that change initiatives are effective, aligned with strategic objectives, and continuously improving. Establishing robust metrics and assessment frameworks, such as KPIs, OKRs, change readiness and stakeholder engagement metrics, stakeholder competency assessments, change adoption metrics, change impact and capacity metrics, and change maturity assessments, is essential to applying the “Measure and Grow” principle effectively.
Incorporating these metrics and assessments into change management practices enables organizations to identify areas for improvement, make informed decisions, and drive continuous improvement. By doing so, change management professionals can enhance the effectiveness of change initiatives, ensure successful adoption, and ultimately achieve better business outcomes.
Change management, much like peeling an onion, involves uncovering multiple layers before reaching the core. Each layer peeled back in the journey of planning and implementing change reveals new insights about the organization and the stakeholders impacted by the change. This process is essential to understanding the full scope of the change, adapting strategies accordingly, and ensuring successful implementation. By examining the various facets of an organization, such as leadership capability, operational practices, and cultural traits, we can better navigate the complexities of change management. Let’s explore the analogy of peeling an onion in change management and some practical insights for transforming change outcomes.
The Layers of the Onion in Change Management
Peeling the layers – each layer reveals a different facet of the organisation and how they may or may not be conducive to supporting the change. Here are some ‘layers’ you may want to examine.
Leadership and Managerial Capability in Managing Change
Effective change management begins with strong leadership. Leaders and managers play a crucial role in guiding the organization through the transition. Peeling back this layer reveals whether leaders are equipped with the necessary skills, knowledge, and attitudes to drive change. It also highlights their ability to inspire and mobilize their teams, communicate the vision effectively, and manage resistance. Assessing leadership capability is fundamental, as inadequate leadership can hinder the entire change process.
Operational and Business Practices
The next layer involves examining the organization’s operational and business practices. This includes evaluating current workflows, processes, and systems to identify areas that may need adjustment or improvement. Understanding how daily operations align with the proposed changes helps in anticipating potential disruptions and devising strategies to minimize them. Are existing practices consistent with the end state of the change? Are existing practices consistent? Why or why not? This layer also involves identifying key performance indicators (KPIs) that can measure the success of the change initiatives.
Change Governance Practices and Structure
Change governance refers to the frameworks and structures in place to manage and oversee change initiatives. Having the right governance structure ensures that the right oversight and decision making is setup to steer the change to success. Peeling back this layer involves assessing the effectiveness of existing governance mechanisms, such as steering committees, decision-making protocols, and accountability structures. Strong change governance ensures that change initiatives are well-coordinated, resources are allocated appropriately, and progress is monitored consistently. Weak governance, on the other hand, can lead to confusion, misalignment, and failure to achieve desired outcomes.
Key questions to ask here include such as:
Is there sufficient governance bodies in place at different levels of the organisation to support change?
Are there too many governance bodies?
Are decision-making processes clear and effective?
Are the right stakeholders involved in the relevant decision-making areas?
Engagement Channels
Effective engagement is critical in change management. This is more than just communication. This layer focuses on the channels and methods used to engage with stakeholders throughout the change process. Evaluating engagement channels helps in understanding how information is disseminated, feedback is collected, and concerns are addressed. It also highlights the effectiveness of internal communications and the role of external communications in managing stakeholder expectations and perceptions. What channels are most effective for what audience groups? Are there any gaps for engaging with all groups of stakeholders? (beyond just blasting emails or messages).
Change Champion Network
Change champions are resignated individuals within the organization who advocate for and support the change initiatives. Peeling back this layer involves identifying and empowering these champions. It also includes assessing their influence, credibility, and ability to motivate others. A strong network of change champions can facilitate smoother transitions by promoting buy-in, addressing resistance, and reinforcing positive behaviors. With the right nurturing and experience, an organisation-wide change champion network can act to support a myriad of change initiatives.
System and Process Maturity
The maturity of systems and processes within an organization significantly impacts the success of change initiatives. This layer involves evaluating the current state of technological systems, process automation, and data management practices. Mature systems and processes provide a solid foundation for implementing changes efficiently and effectively. Conversely, immature systems may require significant upgrades or overhauls to support the desired changes.
Change Management Maturity
Change management maturity refers to the organization’s overall capability to manage change. Peeling back this layer involves assessing the maturity of change management practices, methodologies, and tools. Organizations with mature change management capabilities have established frameworks, experienced practitioners, and a culture that embraces change. In contrast, organizations with low maturity may struggle with inconsistencies, resistance, and a lack of structured approaches.
This layer examines the availability of resources and capacity to support change initiatives. It includes assessing the organization’s financial resources, human capital, and physical infrastructure. Adequate resources and capacity are essential for executing change plans, overcoming obstacles, and sustaining momentum. Insufficient resources can lead to delays, reduced quality, and increased stress on employees. This does not just include the resources required within the project itself, it points more to the impacted stakeholders and if they have the resources and capacity required to undergo the change.
Culture and Behavioral Traits
Organizational culture and behavioral traits play a significant role in how change is perceived and adopted. Peeling back this layer involves understanding the underlying values, beliefs, and behaviors that influence how employees respond to change. It also includes identifying cultural strengths that can be leveraged and cultural barriers that need to be addressed. A supportive culture fosters resilience, adaptability, and a positive attitude towards change.
Specifically:
Do existing behaviours and practices support the change end state?
Are there potentially inconsistent behaviours comparing the end state and the current state?
Beyond the specific behaviours required in the change initiative itself, how are these in alignment with broader cultural practices?
Key Takeaways from the Onion Analogy in Change Management
1. Each Layer Needs to Be Peeled Before Another Layer Can Be Peeled
The process of discovering and understanding the complexities of change cannot be rushed. Each layer provides valuable insights and learning opportunities that prepare the organization for the next layer of discovery. Skipping layers or rushing through the process can lead to incomplete assessments, overlooked challenges, and ineffective solutions. Patience and persistence are crucial for a thorough and successful change management journey.
Assessing and understanding each layer can take time. Data, both quantitative and qualitative, may be required to truly understand what each layer means and how it implicates the change.
2. How the Onion Appears May Not Be What It Is at Its Core
Initial perceptions of the organization may not reflect its true state. It takes time and effort to uncover the deeper issues, strengths, and opportunities. This requires a willingness to look beyond surface-level indicators and delve into the core aspects of the organization. Attention to detail and a commitment to uncovering the truth are essential for developing accurate and effective change strategies.
For example:
Are publically communicated and reinforced messages acted on?
Do leaders practice what they preach?
Do stakeholders commit to decisions already made? Or do they ignore it?
Is there clear alignment between different layers of the organisation? How is this done?
3. You May Discover Rotten Parts That Need to Be Replaced
During the process of peeling back layers, you may encounter parts of the organization that are severely inadequate or dysfunctional. These “rotten” parts may need to be replaced or significantly improved before the change can proceed. This could involve overhauling critical capabilities, restructuring teams, or implementing new systems. Recognizing and addressing these issues promptly is essential for ensuring the overall health and success of the organization.
You may find, for example:
Stakeholders that are adamant to block the change for various reasons
Teams that simply do not have the right skills or attitude to transition to the required state
Processes that are simply outdated or convoluted, so much that end state targets cannot be achieved
Systems that are outdated and do not provide the right insights to support the end state
4. Different Types of Onions and Organizations
Just as there are different types of onions, organizations vary in size, complexity, and nature. Assessing the complexity of the change at the outset helps in determining the time, effort, and resources required to peel back the layers. A comprehensive understanding of the organization’s unique characteristics allows for tailored change management strategies that address specific needs and challenges.
Practical Steps for Applying the Onion Analogy in Change Management
Step 1: Initial Assessment and Planning
Begin by conducting a thorough initial assessment of the organization. This involves gathering data, engaging with key stakeholders, and understanding the current state of affairs. Develop a comprehensive change management plan that outlines the objectives, scope, and timelines for each layer of the onion. This plan should also identify key metrics for measuring success and mechanisms for tracking progress.
Step 2: Assess Leadership and Managerial Capability
Evaluate the capability of leaders and managers to drive change. This includes assessing their skills, experience, and attitudes towards change. Provide training and support where needed to enhance their ability to lead effectively. Strong leadership is foundational to the success of any change initiative.
Step 3: Examine Operational and Business Practices
Analyze current workflows, processes, and systems to identify areas that may require adjustment. Engage with employees at all levels to gather insights and understand potential bottlenecks. Develop strategies to streamline operations and ensure alignment with the change objectives.
Step 4: Review Change Governance Practices
Assess the existing governance structures and practices in place to manage change initiatives. Ensure that there are clear decision-making protocols, accountability mechanisms, and regular progress reviews. Strengthen governance frameworks as needed to support effective change management.
Step 5: Evaluate Engagement Channels
Review the channels and methods used to communicate with stakeholders. Ensure that there are effective mechanisms for disseminating information, collecting feedback, and addressing concerns. Enhance engagement strategies to foster transparency, trust, and collaboration.
Step 6: Identify and Empower Change Champions
Identify individuals within the organization who can serve as change champions. Empower them with the necessary tools, resources, and support to advocate for the change initiatives. Leverage their influence and credibility to promote buy-in and address resistance.
Step 7: Assess System and Process Maturity
Evaluate the maturity of technological systems and processes. Identify areas that require upgrades or improvements to support the change. Invest in the necessary infrastructure and tools to ensure seamless implementation.
Step 8: Assess Change Management Maturity
Conduct a maturity assessment of the organization’s change management capabilities. Identify gaps and areas for improvement. Develop and implement strategies to enhance change management practices, methodologies, and tools.
Step 9: Review Resources and Capacity
Evaluate the availability of resources and capacity to support the change initiatives. Ensure that there are adequate financial, human, and physical resources to execute the change plans. Address any resource constraints proactively to prevent delays and disruptions.
Step 10: Understand Culture and Behavioral Traits
Conduct a cultural assessment to understand the underlying values, beliefs, and behaviors that influence how employees respond to change. Identify cultural strengths that can be leveraged and barriers that need to be addressed. Develop strategies to foster a supportive culture that embraces change.
The analogy of peeling an onion provides a powerful framework for understanding and managing change within an organization. Each layer peeled back reveals new insights and learning opportunities that are essential for successful change management. By carefully examining the various facets of the organization, such as leadership capability, operational practices, and cultural traits, organizations can navigate the complexities of change more effectively.
Patience, persistence, and attention to detail are key to uncovering the true state of the organization and developing tailored strategies that address specific needs and challenges. Ultimately, the journey of peeling the onion in change management leads to a deeper understanding, better preparation, and more successful change outcomes.
When navigating the complexities of organizational change, leaders often rely on analogies to communicate the journey and keep their teams motivated. One common analogy is the “light at the end of the tunnel,” which portrays the change process as a long, dark journey with an illuminating endpoint. We explores why the “light at the end of the tunnel” analogy is inadequate, proposes a more accurate depiction, and provides practical tips for developing a clear vision and crafting a compelling narrative to guide your organization through change.
‘The light at the end of the tunnel’ is often used an analogy when describing the change journey. The tunnel describes the change journey, often dark with potential obstacles along the way. People may not know exactly what the end looks like and at times it may feel frustrating and challenging. Eventually, approaching the end of the journey, people start to see the light at the end of the tunnel. Excitement builds and people get more excited and relieved. The end.
The other key reason why people use this analogy is to stress how important to engage employees so that they are clear with what the end of the tunnel looks like. Being clear with what the end state looks like is critical to sustain momentum and energy to want to keep going along the change journey. The ability to ‘see’ the light at the end of the tunnel in your impacted stakeholders is a key indicator of eventual change success. However, this analogy falls short in capturing the dynamic and multifaceted nature of modern organizational transformations.
In reality, the path to successful change is more like a tunnel with intermittent windows of light, reflecting the multiple initiatives and milestones that punctuate the journey. By adopting this more nuanced analogy, leaders can better communicate the realities of change, maintain momentum, and foster sustained engagement across the organization.
The Shortcomings of the “Light at the End of the Tunnel” Analogy
Misleading Simplicity
The “light at the end of the tunnel” analogy suggests a linear, singular path with a single destination. It implies that the journey is uniformly dark and challenging until the very end, where a sudden and complete transformation occurs. This perspective can be misleading for several reasons:
Oversimplification: Organizational change is rarely a single, straightforward journey. It involves multiple phases, each with its own challenges and victories. The analogy fails to account for the complexity and non-linear nature of most change processes.
Unrealistic Expectations: By implying that the journey is mostly dark and only brightens at the end, this analogy can demoralize teams. It suggests that rewards and progress are only visible at the conclusion, which can lead to fatigue and disengagement.
Neglect of Ongoing Progress: The analogy does not recognize the incremental achievements and intermittent successes that occur throughout the change process. These smaller victories are crucial for maintaining motivation and momentum.
Failing to Reflect Reality
In reality, organizational change involves multiple initiatives running concurrently, each with its own goals, challenges, and successes. These initiatives create a landscape that is far from uniformly dark; instead, it is punctuated with periods of light—moments of clarity, success, and learning.
When there are multiple initiatives the key then becomes to pain the overall picture of what the end of the tunnel looks like. This is not just what the end state of one initiative looks like. It is what the culmination of all the various changes look like. It is about articulating super clearly what it means to have reached particular milestones within the various strategies undertaken (of which the various changes are aimed to support).
A More Accurate Analogy: A Tunnel with Intermittent Windows of Light
Embracing the Multifaceted Nature of Change
A more fitting analogy for the change journey is a tunnel with intermittent windows of light. This analogy acknowledges the complexity and multifaceted nature of change. Here’s why it’s more appropriate:
Multiple Initiatives: Organizations often undertake several change initiatives simultaneously. Each initiative represents a different window of light, providing opportunities for progress and insight along the way.
Intermittent Successes: This analogy highlights the importance of recognizing and celebrating interim successes. These windows of light can rejuvenate the team’s spirit and provide evidence that the change is working.
Continuous Learning: Intermittent light symbolizes moments of learning and adaptation. As the organization progresses, these windows provide valuable feedback, allowing for adjustments and improvements.
Sustained Motivation: By acknowledging periodic achievements, this analogy helps sustain motivation. Teams can look forward to these windows of light, making the journey less daunting and more engaging.
Developing a Clear Picture of the End State
Importance of a Clear Vision
A clear and compelling vision is essential for guiding the organization through change. It provides a sense of direction and purpose, helping teams understand the ultimate goal and their role in achieving it. Here are practical steps to develop and communicate a clear picture of the end state:
Define the Vision: Articulate a clear, concise, and inspiring vision that encapsulates the desired end state. This vision should align with the organization’s values and strategic objectives.
Involve Stakeholders: Engage key stakeholders in the vision development process. Their input and buy-in are critical for ensuring that the vision is relevant and achievable.
Visualize the Future: Create visual representations of the end state, such as diagrams, infographics, or mock-ups. These tools can help make the vision more tangible and relatable.
Break Down the Vision: Decompose the vision into specific, measurable objectives and milestones. This makes the vision more manageable and provides clear targets for the team to aim for.
Communicate Consistently: Regularly communicate the vision and progress towards it. Use multiple channels and formats to ensure that the message reaches all parts of the organization.
Crafting the Story for Your Audience
Tailoring the Narrative
Crafting a compelling story that resonates with different audiences within the organization is crucial for maintaining engagement and momentum. Here’s how to tailor the narrative effectively:
Understand Your Audience: Different groups within the organization will have different concerns, priorities, and levels of influence. Tailor the narrative to address the specific needs and interests of each audience segment.
Highlight Relevance: Explain how the change will impact each audience group. Highlight the benefits and address potential concerns to demonstrate relevance and importance.
Use Relatable Examples: Use examples and stories that resonate with each audience group. Relatable narratives can make the vision more accessible and credible.
Showcase Interim Wins: Regularly share stories of interim successes and milestones. These stories can serve as proof points that the change is progressing and having a positive impact.
Leverage Champions: Identify and empower change champions within each audience group. These individuals can help amplify the narrative and foster a sense of ownership and commitment.
The story can be, and should be, articulated at different levels of the organisation. Senior leaders have a role to play to illustrate what business will look like and how the organisation will function differently. Departmental managers also have a role to play to spell out how the work of the department will change accordingly. Team leaders also need to play a part in deciphering what the changes will look like and how the work of the team will evolve in the future. The managerial skills required in doing this and to help employee join dots is critical and cannot be neglected.
Keeping the Momentum
Maintaining momentum throughout the change process requires continuous effort and strategic communication. Here are some tips to keep the energy and enthusiasm alive:
Celebrate Milestones: Acknowledge and celebrate interim successes and milestones. This not only boosts morale but also reinforces the perception of progress.
Provide Regular Updates: Keep the organization informed about the progress, challenges, and next steps. Transparency builds trust and keeps the team aligned.
Encourage Feedback: Create channels for feedback and actively seek input from the team. This fosters a sense of involvement and helps identify areas for improvement.
Adapt and Iterate: Be prepared to adapt the approach based on feedback and changing circumstances. Flexibility is key to navigating the complexities of change.
Recognize Effort: Regularly recognize and reward the efforts and contributions of individuals and teams. Appreciation and recognition can significantly enhance motivation and engagement.
The “light at the end of the tunnel” analogy, while common, fails to capture the true nature of organizational change. A more accurate depiction is a tunnel with intermittent windows of light, reflecting the multiple initiatives, interim successes, and continuous learning that characterize the change journey. By adopting this more nuanced analogy, leaders can better communicate the realities of change, maintain momentum, and foster sustained engagement across the organization.
To navigate the complexities of change effectively, it is crucial to develop a clear vision of the end state and craft a compelling narrative tailored to different audiences. Regularly celebrating milestones, providing updates, encouraging feedback, and recognizing effort are all essential strategies for maintaining motivation and ensuring the successful implementation of change initiatives. By embracing these practices, organizations can not only survive the journey through the tunnel but thrive and emerge stronger on the other side.
Managing change saturation can be tricky. It is not necessarily something you can see or touch. It can be hidden. It can be hearsay. Without the right data organisations can miss the risk. Missing the risk can mean that your organisation suffers from performance drops, and at the same time your changes are not adopted. Managing the risk or presence of change saturation can be complex. In this article we leverage the principles of chi to do this.
Understanding Change Saturation
Managing change saturation is essentially about managing the organizational energy. When an organization experiences too many changes at once, it can lead to fatigue, resistance, and decreased productivity among employees. Just like in traditional Chinese medicine, where the flow of chi, or vital energy, through the body is crucial for good health, the flow and maintenance of energy within an organization is essential for its success.
The Principle of Chi
In Chinese philosophy, chi is the fundamental life force that flows through all living beings and the universe. It is the energy that animates and sustains everything. The concept of chi can be applied to organizations as well, where it represents the energy that drives processes, interactions, and productivity. Chi is recognized as the energy that flows beyond the physical, connecting us with universal energy.
By understanding and applying the principles of chi, organizations can effectively manage their energy and navigate through periods of change without succumbing to saturation. Just as in traditional Chinese medicine, where balance and harmony are essential for optimal health, maintaining balance and harmony within the organization is crucial for its well-being.
Symptoms of Change Saturation
Before delving into techniques for managing change saturation, it’s essential to recognize the symptoms. From an individual perspective, symptoms may include:
Burnout: Employees may feel overwhelmed and exhausted, leading to decreased motivation and productivity.
Resistance: There may be increased resistance to change as employees become fatigued from constant transitions.
Stress: High levels of stress and anxiety can manifest in physical and emotional symptoms such as headaches, insomnia, and irritability.
From an organizational perspective, symptoms may include:
Decreased Performance: The organization may experience a decline in overall performance and efficiency.
Increased Turnover: Employees may leave the organization due to stress and burnout.
Lack of engagement: Employees may not engage with where the organisation is heading and not feel invested.
Lack of Innovation: Change saturation can stifle creativity and innovation as employees focus on managing constant changes rather than exploring new ideas. During times of anxiety and stress, there is not sufficient mental capacity for innovation.
Recognizing these symptoms is a key step in addressing change saturation and restoring balance to the organization.
Managing Chi in Change Management
Just as traditional Chinese medicine emphasizes practices to cultivate and balance chi within the body, organizations can adopt techniques to manage their energy and navigate through periods of change effectively.
Some of these techniques include:
Building Capability and Capacity:
Building capability in managing change is essential for ensuring that employees have the skills and knowledge needed to navigate through periods of change effectively. This is similar to the process of developing and cultivation chi through learning. In a similar vein, change practitioners can take practical steps to build capability within their organizations which will increase the capacity for change, including:
Training and Development Programs: Implementing training and development programs focused on change management principles, methodologies, and best practices. These programs can include workshops, seminars, online courses, and coaching sessions to help employees develop the necessary skills and competencies for managing change.
Change Leadership Development: Investing in the development of change leadership skills among managers and leaders within the organization. Change leaders play a critical role in driving change initiatives forward, communicating effectively with employees, and fostering a culture of openness and adaptability. Leaders have a significant impact on the change outcome so this is critical.
Mentorship and Coaching: Establishing mentorship and coaching programs where experienced change practitioners can mentor and support employees who are new to change management. This provides valuable guidance and support to individuals as they navigate through change initiatives and develop their skills over time.
Communities of Practice: Creating communities of practice where change practitioners can come together to share knowledge, experiences, and best practices. These communities provide a platform for collaboration, learning, and networking among individuals with a shared interest in change management.
On-the-Job Learning Opportunities: Providing employees with opportunities to apply their change management skills in real-world scenarios. This can include participating in change projects, leading change initiatives, and taking on new roles and responsibilities that require them to apply their knowledge and expertise in managing change.
Establishing Routines:
Establishing routines and processes for managing change helps create structure and consistency within the organization. Think of this like exercising to develop the chi. Through exercises chi practitioners can harness the energy flow through controlled movements. Regular practices to cultivate and manage chi are essential. Change practitioners can implement the following practical routines to ensure that change initiatives are effectively managed and monitored:
Change Readiness Assessments: Conducting regular change readiness assessments to gage the organization’s readiness for upcoming change initiatives. This involves assessing factors such as employee readiness, organizational readiness, and potential barriers to change.
Effective change communication channels: Having effective communication channels that provide community based information flow and discussions as well as 2-way information sharing between the leadership and employees is critical. Effective communication channels need to be managed and promoted to ensure they are working to support change communication goals.
Change Governance: A part of practicing change is about regularly reviewing change data and making decisions to improve how change is managed and how change is implemented. This also includes ongoing monitoring of the capacity of change and any risks of change saturation. Ultimately, making the right decision on the prioritisation and sequencing of change has significant impact on change saturation.
Change Monitoring and Reporting: Establishing mechanisms for monitoring and reporting on the progress of change initiatives. This may include regular status updates and progress reports to feed data requirements of change governance bodies and identify areas for improvement. Collecting and reviewing change data should be viewed as a part of managing business (business as usual) vs. an ‘extra’ task.
Providing Support:
In the manipulation and healing of chi this is about transferring the energy from the healer to the patient to restore balance and health. Techniques like Reiki, Qigong healing, and therapeutic touch are popular forms. Likewise in change management, providing support to employees throughout the change process is essential for mitigating resistance, reducing stress, and fostering a culture of resilience.
Change practitioners can offer practical support in the following ways:
Change Champion Networks: Establishing change champion networks comprised of enthusiastic and influential employees who can help drive change initiatives forward within their respective teams or departments. Change champions serve as advocates for change, providing support, encouragement, and guidance to their colleagues throughout the change process.
Change Coaching and Mentoring: Offering one-on-one coaching and mentoring support to employees who may be struggling to adapt to change. This provides individuals with a safe space to express their concerns, seek guidance, and develop coping strategies for managing change effectively.
Change Support Resources: Providing employees with access to resources and tools to support them through the change process. This may include training materials, job aids, self-help resources, and online support forums where employees can access information, share experiences, and seek assistance from their peers.
Leadership Support and Involvement: Engaging leaders and managers at all levels of the organization in supporting change initiatives and modeling desired behaviors. Leaders play a crucial role in setting the tone for change, communicating the vision, and demonstrating their commitment to supporting employees through periods of transition.
Employee Assistance Programs: Offering employee assistance programs (EAPs) or counseling services to employees who may be experiencing stress, anxiety, or other emotional challenges related to change. Providing access to confidential counseling and support services can help employees cope with the emotional impact of change and build resilience over time.
Creating the Right Work Environment:
Managing chi is not just about the individual, it also extends to the environment. To harness good chi, factors such as room layout and the overall design of the environment are also important. The goal is to create an environment where chi can flow freely, bringing balance, health and prosperity.
Creating a supportive work environment can foster chi, and is essential for fostering resilience, innovation, and collaboration within the organization. Change practitioners can take practical steps to create the right work environment for managing change, including:
Promoting Psychological Safety: Creating a culture of psychological safety where employees feel comfortable expressing their ideas, concerns, and feedback without fear of reprisal or judgment. Psychological safety encourages open communication, trust, and collaboration, which are essential for navigating through periods of change. This needs to be modelled and supported through leaders.
Encouraging Flexibility and Adaptability: Encouraging flexibility and adaptability among employees by promoting a growth mindset and embracing change as an opportunity for learning and growth. Providing opportunities for employees to develop new skills, explore new roles, and take on new challenges can help foster a culture of resilience and agility within the organization.
Fostering Collaboration and Teamwork: Fostering a collaborative and inclusive work environment where employees feel valued, respected, and empowered to contribute their unique perspectives and talents. Encouraging cross-functional collaboration, team-building activities, and knowledge sharing helps break down silos and promote a sense of unity and common purpose among employees.
Providing Adequate Resources and Support: Ensuring that employees have access to the resources, tools, and support they need to succeed in their roles and navigate through periods of change effectively. This may include providing training and development opportunities, allocating sufficient time and resources for change initiatives, and offering ongoing support and guidance from leadership.
Celebrating Success and Milestones: Celebrating success and milestones along the change journey to recognize the efforts and achievements of employees. Acknowledging progress, rewarding contributions, and celebrating successes helps build morale, motivation, and momentum for future change initiatives.
Maintaining Cadence:
Maintaining a consistent cadence for change initiatives helps prevent overload and fatigue, ensuring that change is managed effectively and sustainably over time. Change practitioners can maintain cadence by:
Setting Realistic Timelines and Milestones: Setting realistic timelines and milestones for change initiatives based on the organization’s capacity and resources. This involves carefully planning and sequencing change activities to avoid overwhelming employees and minimize disruption to day-to-day operations.
Prioritizing and Sequencing Change Initiatives: Prioritizing change initiatives based on their strategic importance, urgency, and impact on the organization. This helps focus resources and attention on the most critical changes while ensuring that less urgent changes are managed effectively within the organization’s capacity. The sequencing and design of change impact activities across all initiatives is also critical as this shapes the experiences of employees.
Maintaining Governance and Oversight: Maintaining the right governance structures and oversight mechanisms to ensure that change initiatives are aligned with organizational goals, objectives, and priorities. This may include ensuring the right change management committees (including the right numbers of committees), capable change sponsors, and conducting regular reviews and assessments as to the effectiveness of the governance bodies.
Communicating Regularly and Transparently: Communicating regularly and transparently with employees about the status of change initiatives, upcoming milestones, and any changes to plans or timelines. Providing clear and consistent communication helps keep employees informed, engaged, and ensures there are no surprises.
By incorporating these techniques into their change management practices, organizations can effectively manage change saturation and promote a healthy, resilient, and thriving organizational environment. However, one that supports change and is not prone to change saturation.
Change saturation can pose significant challenges for organizations, leading to decreased performance, employee burnout, and resistance to change. By applying the principles of chi and adopting techniques to manage organizational energy, such as developing capability, and cadence and creating the right environment, organizations can navigate through periods of change more effectively and promote a culture of resilience, innovation, and well-being. Just as in traditional Chinese medicine, where balance and harmony are essential for good health, maintaining balance and harmony within the organization is crucial for its success in an ever-changing world.
To read up more about managing change saturation check these out:
