What Research Says About Change Portfolio Management: Insights for Leaders

What Research Says About Change Portfolio Management: Insights for Leaders

Managing multiple changes is not a new phenomenon for a lot of organisations. However, the value of managing change at a portfolio level is not clear for a lot of leaders. This is a review of academic research on the value of managing multiple change initiatives across an organisation (change portfolio management), with specific focus on the impact of change on people and tangible business benefits. Drawing from peer-reviewed academic sources, this report identifies quantifiable business benefits and performance outcomes associated with effective change portfolio management.

Academic research consistently demonstrates that organisations face significant challenges when implementing multiple change initiatives simultaneously. However, organisations that develop effective change portfolio management capabilities achieve substantially better outcomes, including:

1. Productivity Improvements: Firms with more complex organisational capabilities show “considerably increased firm performance in terms of labour productivity” (Costa et al., 2023).

2. Competitive Advantage: Organisations with better change management capabilities gain strategic advantages over competitors with lower change capacity (Heckmann et al., 2016).

3. Organisational Resilience: Organisations with higher change capacity demonstrate greater resilience during periods of disruption (Mladenova, 2022).

This report synthesizes academic research to provide evidence-based insights on the tangible business benefits of effective change portfolio management.

 

Background

Organisations today face unprecedented pressure to implement multiple simultaneous changes. Technological disruption, competitive pressures, and evolving customer expectations drive the need for continuous transformation. However, academic research reveals that implementing multiple change initiatives simultaneously creates significant challenges for both individuals and organisations.

Here lies the dilemma.  Most organisations are implementing multiple change initiatives.  However, nearly all methodologies and change management concepts are only focused on one singular initiative been executed at a time.

Here we examine peer-reviewed academic research on how change portfolio management affects organisational outcomes and quantifies the tangible business benefits of effective change management. It focuses specifically on the value of effectively managing multiple change initiatives across the organisation and identifies measurable business benefits supported by scholarly evidence.

Journals reviewed

This review synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed academic journals including:

– Journal of Business Research

– SAGE Journals

– Industrial and Corporate Change (Oxford Academic)

– Cogent Business & Management

– Administrative Sciences

– Organisational Dynamics

The research focuses on empirical studies that quantify the relationship between change management approaches and business outcomes. Particular attention was given to studies that provide statistical evidence of the impact of change portfolio management on organisational performance.

 

Change Capacity Limitations: Academic Evidence

The Challenge of Multiple Change Initiatives

Academic research consistently demonstrates that organisations struggle to implement multiple change initiatives simultaneously. Mladenova (2022) found that “multiple and overlapping change initiatives become the norm rather than an exception, thus exert additional pressure on organisations.” Her research identified that when organisations face “increasing levels of unpredictability and need to adapt to fast environmental shifts, linear causal models to plan and implement changes become harder to follow.”  However, the bulk of popular change management concepts are linear in nature.

 

Organisational Capacity for Change

Heckmann et al. (2016) define Organisational Capacity for Change (OCC) as “the capacity of an organisation to institutionalize and manage change on an ongoing basis.” Their empirical research found that “an organisation’s capacity for change associates positively with the performance of its change projects.”

Importantly, the study found that “higher levels of technological turbulence weaken” the relationship between organisational capacity for change and project performance. This suggests that organisations face even greater challenges managing multiple changes during periods of technological disruption.

Adna and Sukoco (2020) studied 313 middle managers and their followers and found that “organisational capacity for change mediates the influence of managerial cognitive capabilities on organisational performance.” Their research demonstrated that organisations need coordinated portfolio approaches to effectively manage multiple changes.  Having the right routines also support continuous and multiple changes.

 

Tangible Business Benefits: Academic Evidence

Success Rate

Academic research provides clear evidence that effective change portfolio management significantly improves success rates:

– Improved Project Performance: Heckmann et al. (2016) found that “an organisation’s capacity for change associates positively with the performance of its change projects” in their empirical study of 134 German firms.

 

Financial Performance Improvements

Academic research demonstrates measurable financial benefits from effective change portfolio management:

– Productivity Gains: Costa et al. (2023) empirically demonstrated that firms with more complex organisational capabilities showed “considerably increases firm performance in terms of labor productivity.” Their study of Italian firms identified that “Complex” organisations (those with highest organisational capabilities) demonstrated superior productivity metrics compared to firms with less developed capabilities.

– Cost Avoidance: Errida and Lotfi (2021) systematic review of literature identified that failed change initiatives result in both direct costs (resources invested) and indirect costs (lost productivity).

– Resource Utilization Efficiency: Rousseau and ten Have (2022) found that organisations using evidence-based change management practices showed improved change-related decision quality, leading to better use of resources during change implementation.

 

Competitive Advantage

Academic research identifies clear competitive advantages from effective change portfolio management:

– Strategic Adaptability: Heckmann et al. (2016) established that organisations with better change management capabilities gain strategic advantages over competitors with lower change capacity. Their research demonstrated that organisations with higher change capacity are better positioned to implement future strategic changes.

– Innovation Implementation: Costa et al. (2023) demonstrated that firms with more complex organisational capabilities showed greater ability to innovate and adapt to market changes. Their research found that “higher organisational complexity—captured by the range and variety of actions put in place by firms—is thus reflected in better performance.”

– Market Responsiveness: Mladenova (2022) found that organisations with higher change capacity can better handle “multiple and overlapping change initiatives” which have “become the norm rather than an exception.” The research identified that organisations with higher change capacity demonstrate superior market responsiveness.

 

Human Capital Benefits

Academic research shows significant human capital benefits from effective change portfolio management:

– Employee Engagement: Mladenova (2022) found that organisations implementing multiple simultaneous changes without adequate change capacity experience diminishing returns partly due to employee disengagement. Organisations with effective change portfolio management maintain higher levels of employee engagement during periods of change.

– Talent Retention: Heckmann et al. (2016) found that organisations with higher change capacity experience lower turnover during periods of change. Their research demonstrated that effective change portfolio management contributes to organisational stability and talent retention.

– Capability Development: Costa et al. (2023) found that organisations with more complex capabilities develop stronger human capital over time. Their research demonstrated that investment in organisational capabilities creates a foundation for future performance improvements.

Organisational Performance Taxonomy

Costa et al. (2023) identified four clusters of firms based on organisational capabilities, providing a framework for understanding the relationship between change capabilities and performance. The following descriptions are inferred from the study and not actual quoted descriptions.

1. Essential (basic capabilities): Organisations with minimal change management capabilities that struggle with implementing multiple changes.

2. Managerial (moderate capabilities): Organisations with some change management capabilities but limited coordination across initiatives.

3. Interdependent (advanced capabilities): Organisations with developed change management capabilities and coordination across initiatives.

4. Complex (highest capabilities): Organisations with capabilities that can effectively implement multiple and complex changes.  These tend to have experienced a range of ‘technological-organisational’ changes.

Their research demonstrated that firms in the Complex and Interdependent clusters showed significantly higher performance metrics than those in the Essential and Managerial clusters. This provides a framework for measuring organisational capability development and its impact on performance.

Recommendations from Academic Research

Academic research suggests several evidence-based approaches to improve change portfolio management:

1. Invest in Change Capacity: Heckmann et al. (2016) recommend that “companies should invest in their capacities for change, particularly in the HRM area” to build change capacity. Their research demonstrated that investment in change capacity is a strategic business decision with measurable returns.

2. Develop Integrated Approaches: Errida and Lotfi (2021) found that “the use of a single model or few models is not sufficient to cover various change situations” and that “integrating existing models may lead to an integrated understanding of how to ensure successful organisational change.”

3. Build on Positive Experiences: Heckmann et al. (2016) found that “positive experiences in previous change projects increase OCC (Organisational Capacity for Change).” Their research demonstrated that successful change experiences create a virtuous cycle that builds change capacity over time.

4. Use Evidence-Based Practices: Rousseau and ten Have (2022) found that “planned change is more likely to succeed when using science-informed practices” and that “regular use of four sources of evidence (scientific, organisational, stakeholder, and practitioner experience) improve the quality of change-related decisions.”

Academic Evidence for Change Portfolio Management

The academic research reviewed in this report provides clear evidence that managing multiple change initiatives as a portfolio delivers significant business benefits compared to uncoordinated change approaches.

Organisations that effectively manage their change portfolio can expect:

1. Improved Financial Performance: Better productivity, cost avoidance, and resource utilization.

2. Competitive Advantages: Enhanced strategic adaptability, innovation implementation, and market responsiveness.

3. Human Capital Benefits: Improved employee engagement, talent retention, and capability development.

4. Long-term Performance: Greater organisational resilience and sustainable growth.

Whilst there is not a lot of research currently in the newly emerging field of change portfolio management, overall academic evidence strongly supports the value of change portfolio management practices as a strategic approach to organisational transformation.

 

References

Adna, B. E., & Sukoco, B. M. (2020). Managerial cognitive capabilities, organisational capacity for change, and performance: The moderating effect of social capital. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1843310

Costa, S., De Santis, S., Dosi, G., Monducci, R., Sbardella, A., & Virgillito, M. E. (2023). From organisational capabilities to corporate performances: at the roots of productivity slowdown. Industrial and Corporate Change, 32(6), 1217-1244. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtad030

Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organisational change management success: Literature review and case study. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211016273

Heckmann, N., Steger, T., & Dowling, M. (2016). Organisational capacity for change, change experience, and change project performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 777-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.012

Mladenova, I. (2022). Relation between Organisational Capacity for Change and Readiness for Change. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040135

Rousseau, D. M., & ten Have, S. (2022). Evidence-based change management. Organisational Dynamics, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2022.100899

Harnessing AI to Combat Change Overload in Transformations

Harnessing AI to Combat Change Overload in Transformations

Organisational transformations are essential for staying competitive in today’s fast-paced world, but they often come with challenges that can derail progress. One of the most pressing issues is change overload—when employees and stakeholders are overwhelmed by the sheer volume or pace of changes being implemented. This can lead to burnout, disengagement, resistance, and ultimately, failure to achieve transformation goals.

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a powerful solution to combat change overload. By leveraging AI tools and strategies, organisations can streamline processes, personalise communication, optimise workflows, and make data-driven decisions that reduce stress and improve adoption rates. This guide provides actionable steps to harness AI effectively in managing large-scale transformations while preventing change fatigue.

1. Diagnose Change Overload with AI-Powered Insights

Before addressing change overload, you need to identify where it exists and how it impacts your organisation. AI-powered analytics tools can provide real-time data on employee sentiment, workload distribution, and engagement levels—helping you pinpoint areas of concern before they escalate.

How to Apply This:

  • Use Sentiment Analysis Tools: Platforms like Microsoft Viva Insights or Qualtrics EmployeeXM can analyse employee feedback from surveys, emails, or chat platforms to detect patterns of stress or disengagement. For example:
    • If sentiment analysis reveals a spike in negative feedback during a specific project phase, it may indicate that employees are overwhelmed by unclear communication or unrealistic deadlines.
  • Monitor Workload Distribution: Tools such as Workday or Asana’s workload management feature can highlight individuals or teams carrying disproportionate workloads. This allows leaders to redistribute tasks more equitably.
  • Track Change Saturation Metrics: Use metrics like the number of concurrent projects per team or the average time spent on change-related activities per week may be a start. AI dashboards can automatically calculate these metrics and flag when thresholds are exceeded.
  • Visualise Change Saturation: Tools such as The Change Compass can help to easily capture change impacts across initiatives and turn these into data visualisation to support decision making.  Embedded AI tools help to interpret the data and call out key risk areas and recommendations.

🔍 Example: A retail organisation undergoing digital transformation used AI sentiment analysis to discover that frontline employees felt excluded from decision-making processes. Leaders adjusted their communication approach to involve key frontline change champions which improved morale and reduced resistance.

2. Streamline Communication Through Personalisation

One-size-fits-all communication often adds to change fatigue by overwhelming employees with ineffective or irrelevant information. AI can help tailor messages based on individual roles, preferences, and needs—ensuring that employees only receive what’s most relevant to them.

How to Apply This:

  • Leverage Natural Language Processing (NLP): Tools like IBM Watson can analyse employee communication styles and suggest tone adjustments for clearer messaging.
  • Segment Audiences Automatically: Use platforms like Poppulo or Dynamic Signal to categorise employees by role, department, or location and deliver targeted updates accordingly. For instance:
    • IT teams might receive detailed technical updates about new systems being implemented, while frontline staff get simplified instructions on how the changes will impact their day-to-day tasks.
  • Automate Feedback Loops: Chatbots powered by AI (e.g., Tidio or Drift) can collect ongoing feedback from employees about the clarity and usefulness of communications during transformation initiatives.

💡 Pro Tip: Combine AI-driven personalisation with human oversight to ensure messages remain empathetic and aligned with organisational culture.

3. Predict Bottlenecks with AI Analytics

One of AI’s greatest strengths is its ability to analyse historical data and predict future outcomes—a capability that’s invaluable for managing change timelines and resource allocation effectively. Predictive analytics can help you anticipate bottlenecks before they occur and adjust your strategy in real time. For example, there could be cyclical periods of the year where the change volume tends to be higher.  From our research at The Change Compass, we’ve seen that across different industries, October-November, and February-March tend to be high change volume periods.

How to Apply This:

  • Forecast Employee Capacity: If you already have the data you can use tools like Tableau or Power BI to predict when teams will be overstretched based on upcoming project timelines and historical workload data.  Alternatively, utilise The Change Compass’ forecasting capabilities to predict trends.
  • Identify High-Risk Areas: Predictive models can flag departments or teams likely to experience resistance based on past behaviours or current engagement levels.
  • Scenario Planning: Use AI simulations (such as those offered by AnyLogic) to test different implementation strategies for your transformation initiative.  The Change Compass also has a scenario planning feature to help you model changes before making the decision.

📊 Example: A financial services firm used predictive analytics during its digital transformation to identify that Q4 was historically the busiest period for its customer service team. By rescheduling non-critical training sessions for later Q1, they reduced employee stress and maintained service quality.

4. Enhance Employee Engagement Through Personalised Learning Platforms

Engaged employees are more likely to embrace change rather than resist it. AI-powered learning platforms offer personalised training pathways that equip employees with the skills they need for new roles or technologies introduced during transformation.

How to Apply This:

  • Create Adaptive Learning Journeys: Platforms like Degreed or EdCast use AI algorithms to recommend training modules based on an employee’s current skill set and career aspirations.
  • Gamify Learning Experiences: Incorporate gamification elements such as badges or leaderboards into your training programs using tools like Kahoot! or Quizizz.
  • Monitor Training Effectiveness: Use analytics within learning management systems (LMS) like Cornerstone OnDemand to track completion rates, quiz scores, and time spent on modules.

🎯 Action Step: Pair training initiatives with clear career progression opportunities tied directly to the transformation goals—for example, offering certifications for mastering new software systems being implemented.

5. Automate Routine Tasks Using AI Tools

Repetitive tasks drain employees’ energy and time—resources that could be better spent on strategic initiatives during transformations. Automation powered by AI can alleviate this burden by handling routine tasks efficiently. This not only reduces workload but also empowers employees to focus on higher-value activities that drive transformation success.

Note that this approach is assuming the organisation has the appetite to leverage AI and automation to reduce workload.

How to Apply This:

  • Automate Administrative Tasks: Tools like UiPath or Zapier can automate workflows such as data entry, meeting scheduling, or report generation. For example:
    • Automating the creation of weekly project status reports allows project managers to spend more time addressing risks and engaging with stakeholders.
  • Streamline Onboarding Processes: Implement chatbots like Leena AI or Talla that guide employees through onboarding steps during organisational changes. These tools can answer FAQs, provide training schedules, and even send reminders for task completion.
  • Enable Self-Service Options: Deploy virtual assistants (e.g., Google Dialogflow) that allow employees to access FAQs about new policies, systems, or procedures without waiting for human support.

💡 Pro Tip: When automating tasks, ensure transparency with employees about what is being automated and why. This helps build trust and prevents fears about job security.

6. Foster Workforce Readiness Through Real-Time Feedback Loops

Continuous feedback is essential during transformations—it helps leaders course-correct quickly while keeping employees informed and engaged. However, traditional feedback mechanisms like annual surveys are often too slow to capture real-time issues. AI tools enable organisations to collect and analyse feedback at scale in real time, creating a more agile approach to managing change fatigue.

How to Apply This:

  • Deploy Pulse Surveys: Platforms like Culture Amp or Peakon use AI algorithms to analyse survey responses instantly and provide actionable insights. For example:
    • If a pulse survey reveals low morale in a specific department, leaders can intervene immediately with targeted support or communication efforts.
  • Monitor Collaboration Metrics: Tools such as Slack Insights or Microsoft Teams Analytics track engagement levels within collaboration platforms. If metrics show a drop in activity or participation, it could indicate disengagement or confusion about transformation goals.
  • Close Feedback Loops Quickly: Use automated workflows triggered by feedback results. For instance:
    • If employees flag a lack of clarity about a new system rollout, an automated workflow can schedule additional training sessions or send out simplified guides.

📌 Key Insight: Real-time feedback not only identifies issues early but also demonstrates that leadership values employee input—a critical factor in building trust during change.

7. Leverage AI for Change Impact Assessments

One of the most overlooked aspects of managing change is understanding its cumulative impact across the organisation. Many organisations fail to consider how multiple simultaneous changes affect employee capacity and morale. AI tools can help conduct comprehensive change impact assessments by analysing data across projects, teams, and timelines.

How to Apply This:

  • Map Change Dependencies: Use AI-powered tools like The Change Compass to visualise how different initiatives overlap and interact. For example:
    • If two major IT upgrades are scheduled for the same quarter, the tool can flag potential conflicts and recommend rescheduling one of them as well as locating the right timing.
    • It could also be a series of smaller initiatives all being executed at the same time, again leading to the risk that key messages may not be absorbed by impacted employees
  • Analyse Historical Data: Predict how similar changes have impacted the organisation in the past using predictive analytics tools mentioned previously.
  • Simulate Scenarios: Run simulations to test different implementation strategies (e.g., phased vs big-bang rollouts) and predict their impact on employee workload and engagement.

🔍 Example: A global logistics company used AI-driven impact assessments to identify that rolling out a new CRM system during peak holiday season would overwhelm its sales team. By postponing the rollout until after the busy period, they avoided unnecessary stress and ensured smoother adoption.

8. Enhance Employee Engagement Through Gamification

AI can make transformation initiatives more engaging by incorporating gamification elements into training programs, communication strategies, and performance tracking systems. Gamification taps into employees’ intrinsic motivation by rewarding participation and progress—making change feel less daunting and more rewarding.

How to Apply This:

  • Gamify Training Programs: Use platforms like Kahoot! or Quizizz to create interactive quizzes and challenges related to new systems or processes being introduced.
  • Incentivise Participation: Offer digital badges, points, or leaderboards for completing key milestones in transformation initiatives (e.g., attending training sessions or adopting new tools).
  • Track Progress Automatically: AI-powered LMS platforms like Degreed can track employee progress in real time and provide personalised recommendations for next steps.

🎯 Action Step: Pair gamification efforts with tangible rewards such as gift cards or extra leave days for top performers.

💡 Pro Tip: Ensure gamification efforts are inclusive—design challenges that appeal to all personality types, not just competitive individuals.

9. Use AI for Personalised Coaching

AI-powered coaching platforms are revolutionising how organisations support their employees during transformations. These tools provide personalised guidance tailored to each employee’s role, skills, and career aspirations—helping them navigate change more effectively while feeling supported.

How to Apply This:

  • Deploy Virtual Coaches: Platforms like BetterUp or CoachHub use AI algorithms to match employees with virtual coaches who provide tailored advice on navigating change.
  • Provide Role-Specific Guidance: Use AI tools that offer customised recommendations based on an employee’s role within the organisation. For instance:
    • A sales representative might receive tips on leveraging new CRM features, while a manager gets guidance on leading their team through uncertainty.
  • Monitor Coaching Effectiveness: Track metrics such as employee satisfaction scores or performance improvements after coaching sessions.

🔍 Example: A tech company implementing agile methodologies used an AI coaching platform to train managers on fostering collaboration within cross-functional teams. The result was a smoother transition with fewer bottlenecks.

10. Integrate Change Management into Your Digital Transformation Strategy

AI should not operate in isolation; it must be embedded into your broader change management framework for maximum impact. This includes aligning AI initiatives with existing change management methodologies.

How to Apply This:

  • Centralise Data Sources: Use platforms like The Change Compass to consolidate insights from various data sources into a single dashboard, think data sources such as system usage, performance KPIs and employee survey results.  It also enables you to capture your change data and deliverables according to your preferred methodology and populate data with generative AI.
  • Align Metrics Across Teams: Ensure KPIs related to change readiness (e.g., adoption rates) are consistent across departments.
  • Train Leaders on AI Capabilities: Equip managers with basic knowledge of how AI works so they can champion its use within their teams.

🌟 Final Thought: The integration of AI into change management isn’t just about technology—it’s about creating a culture of adaptability where data-driven decisions empower people at every level of the organisation.

Call-to-Action: Start Your Journey Towards Smarter Change Management

The challenges of large-scale transformations don’t have to result in burnout or disengagement when you harness the power of artificial intelligence effectively. Begin by assessing your current change portfolio environment—what tools are you already using? Where are the gaps? Then explore how AI solutions can fill those gaps while aligning with your organisational goals.

Ready to take the next step? Dive deeper into strategies for agile change portfolio management here and discover how data-driven insights can revolutionise your approach today!

Avoiding Change Collisions: Lessons from Air Traffic Accidents for Smarter Change and Transformation

Avoiding Change Collisions: Lessons from Air Traffic Accidents for Smarter Change and Transformation

Air traffic control is one of the most sophisticated and high-stakes management systems in the world. Ensuring the safety of thousands of flights daily requires rigorous coordination, precise timing, and a structured yet adaptable approach. When failures occur, they often result in catastrophic consequences, as seen in the tragic January 2025 midair collision between an army helicopter and a passenger jet in Washington, D.C. airspace.

Think about the last time you took a flight. You probably didn’t worry about how the pilot knew where to go, how to land safely, or how to avoid other planes in the sky. That’s because air traffic control is a well-oiled machine, built on a foundation of real-time data, clear protocols, and experienced professionals making split-second decisions. Now, imagine if air traffic controllers had to work with outdated information, or if pilots had to rely on intuition rather than hard facts. Chaos, right?

The same principles that apply to managing air traffic also hold valuable lessons for change and transformation management within organisations. Large-scale transformations involve multiple initiatives running in parallel, conflicting priorities, and significant risks. Without a structured, centralised approach, organisations risk failure, reduced value realisation, and employee fatigue.

The same logic applies to organisational change and transformation. Leaders are often trying to land multiple initiatives at once, each with its own trajectory, speed, and impact. Without real-time, accurate data, it’s all too easy for change initiatives to collide, stall, or overwhelm employees. Just as the aviation industry depends on continuous data updates to prevent disasters, businesses must embrace data-driven decision-making to ensure their transformation efforts succeed.

Here we’ll explore what air traffic control can teach us about using data effectively in change management. If you’ve ever felt like your organisation’s transformation efforts are flying blind, chaotic and uncoordinated, this one’s for you.

Lesson 1: The Danger of Overloading Critical Roles

The D.C. Midair Collision: A Case of Role Overload

In January 2025, a tragic midair collision occurred in Washington, D.C. airspace between an army helicopter and a passenger jet, claiming 67 lives. Investigations revealed multiple contributing factors, including inadequate pilot training, fatigue, insufficient maintenance, and ignored safety protocols. This incident underscored the dangers of overstretched resources, outdated processes, and poor data visibility—lessons that extend beyond aviation and into how organisations manage complex, high-stakes operations like change and transformation.

Additionally, the air traffic controller on duty was handling both helicopter and airplane traffic simultaneously, leading to a critical lapse in coordination. This split focus contributed to poor coordination and a lack of real-time situational awareness, ultimately leading to disaster.   This is aligned with findings from various research that providing adequate resources is important in driving change and transformation.

Parallels in Change and Transformation Management

Organisations often suffer from similar overload issues when managing change. Many initiatives—ranging from business-as-usual (BAU) efforts to large-scale transformations—compete for attention, resources, and stakeholder engagement. Without a structured approach, teams end up working in silos, unaware of competing priorities or overlapping impacts.

There are some who argue that change is the new norm, so employees just need to get on the program and learn to adapt.  It may be easy to say this, but successful organisations have learnt how to do this, versus ignoring the issue.  After all, managing capacity and resources is a normal part of any effective operations management and strategy execution.  Within a change context, the effects are just more pronounced given the timelines and the need to balance both business-as-usual and changes.

Key Takeaways:

  • Centralised Oversight: Organisations need a structured governance model—whether through a Transformation Office, PMO, or Change Centre of Excellence—to track all initiatives and prevent “collisions.”
  • Clear Role Definition: Initiative owners and sponsors should have a clear understanding of their responsibilities, engagement processes, and decision-making frameworks.
  • Avoiding Initiative Overload: Employees experience “change fatigue” when multiple transformations run concurrently without proper coordination. Leaders must balance initiative rollout to ensure sustainable adoption.

Lesson 2: Providing Initiative Owners with Data-Driven Decision Autonomy

The UPS ‘Continuous Descent Arrivals’ System

UPS has been testing a data-driven approach to landings called ‘Continuous Descent Arrivals’ (source: Wall Street Journal article: Managing Air Traffic Control). Instead of relying solely on air traffic controllers to direct landing schedules, pilots have access to a full dashboard of real-time data, allowing them to determine their optimal landing times while still following a structured governance protocol.  While CDA is effective during light traffic conditions, implementing it during heavy traffic poses technical challenges. Air traffic controllers must ensure safe separation between aircraft while optimising descent paths.

Applying This to Agile Change Management

In agile organisations, multiple initiatives are constantly iterating, requiring a balance between flexibility and coordination. Rather than centralised bottleneck approvals, initiative owners should be empowered to make informed, autonomous decisions—provided they follow structured governance (and when there is less risk of multiple releases and impacts on the business).

Key Takeaways:

  • Real-Time Data Sharing: Just as pilots rely on up-to-date flight data, organisations must have a transparent system where initiative owners can see enterprise-wide transformation impacts and adjust accordingly.
  • Governance Without Bureaucracy: Pre-set governance protocols should allow for self-service decision-making without stifling agility.
  • Last-Minute Adjustments with Predictability: Agile initiatives should have the flexibility to adjust their release schedules as long as they adhere to predefined impact management processes.

Lesson 3: Resourcing Air Traffic Control for Organisational Change

Lack of Air Traffic Controllers: A Root Cause of the D.C. Accident

The D.C. accident highlighted that understaffing was a critical factor. Insufficient air traffic controllers led to delayed decision-making and unsafe airspace conditions.

The Importance of Resource Allocation in Change and Transformation

Many organisations lack a dedicated team overseeing enterprise-wide change. Instead, initiatives operate independently, often leading to inefficiencies, redundancies, and conflicts. According to McKinsey, companies that effectively prioritise and allocate resources to transformation initiatives can generate 40% more value compared to their peers.

Key Takeaways:

  • Dedicated Transformation Governance Teams: Whether in the form of a PMO, Transformation Office, or Change Centre of Excellence, a central function should be responsible for initiative alignment.
  • Prioritisation Frameworks: Not all initiatives should receive equal attention. Organisations must establish structured prioritisation mechanisms based on value, risk, and strategic alignment.
  • Investment in Change Capacity: Just as air traffic controllers are indispensable to aviation safety, organisations must invest in skilled change professionals to ensure seamless initiative execution.

Lesson 4: Proactive Risk Management to Prevent Initiative Collisions

The Risk of Unchecked Initiative Timelines

Just as midair collisions can occur due to inadequate tracking of aircraft positions, organisational change initiatives can “crash” when timelines and impacts are not actively managed. Without a real-time view of concurrent changes, organisations risk:

  • Conflicting Business Priorities: Competing transformations may pull resources in different directions, leading to delays and reduced impact.
  • Change Saturation: Employees struggle to absorb too many changes at once, leading to disengagement and lower adoption.
  • Operational Disruptions: Poorly sequenced initiatives can create unintended consequences, disrupting critical business functions.

Establishing a Proactive “Air Traffic Control” for Change

  • Enterprise Change Heatmaps: Organisations should maintain a real-time dashboard of ongoing and upcoming changes to anticipate and mitigate risks.
  • Stakeholder Impact Assessments: Before launching initiatives, leaders must assess cumulative impacts on employees and customers.
  • Strategic Sequencing: Similar to how air traffic controllers ensure safe landing schedules, organisations must deliberately pace their change initiatives.

The Role of Data in Change and Transformation: Lessons from Air Traffic Control

You Need a Single Source of Truth—No More Guesswork

Aviation Example: The Power of Integrated Data Systems

In aviation, pilots and controllers don’t work off scattered spreadsheets or conflicting reports. They use a unified system that integrates radar, satellite tracking, and aircraft GPS, providing a single, comprehensive view of air traffic. With this system, pilots and controllers can see exactly where each aircraft is and make informed decisions to keep everyone safe.

Application in Change Management: Why Fragmented Data is a Recipe for Disaster

Now, compare this to how many organisations manage change. Different business units track initiatives in separate spreadsheets, using inconsistent reporting standards. Transformation offices, HR, finance, and IT often operate in silos, each with their own version of the truth. When leaders don’t have a clear, real-time picture of what’s happening across the organisation, it’s like trying to land a plane in thick fog—without instruments.

Key Takeaways:

  • Create a Centralised Change Management Platform: Just like air traffic control relies on a single system, organisations need a centralised platform where all change initiatives are tracked in real time.
  • Standardise Data Collection and Reporting: Everyone involved in change initiatives should follow the same data standards to ensure consistency and accuracy.
  • Increase Visibility Across Business Units: Leaders need an enterprise-wide view of all change efforts to avoid conflicts and align priorities.

Real-Time Data Enables Agile, Confident Decision-Making

Aviation Example: UPS’s ‘Continuous Descent Arrivals’

UPS has a fascinating system for managing landings, known as ‘Continuous Descent Arrivals.’ Instead of waiting for air traffic controllers to dictate their landing time, pilots receive real-time data about their approach, runway conditions, and surrounding traffic. This allows them to determine the best landing time themselves—within a structured framework. The result? More efficient landings, less fuel waste, and greater overall safety.

Application in Change Management: The Danger of Outdated Reports

Too often, business leaders make transformation decisions based on data that’s weeks—or even months—old. By the time they realise a problem, the initiative has already veered off course. When leaders lack real-time data, they either act too late or overcorrect, causing further disruptions.

Key Takeaways:

  • Use Live Dashboards for Initiative Management: Just as pilots rely on real-time flight data, change leaders should have constantly updated dashboards showing initiative progress, risks, and dependencies.
  • Empower Initiative Owners with Data-Driven Autonomy: When given up-to-date information, initiative owners can make faster, smarter adjustments—without waiting for top-down approvals.
  • Leverage Predictive Analytics to Anticipate Challenges: AI-driven insights can flag potential risks, such as change saturation or conflicting priorities, before they become full-blown issues.

Data-Driven Risk Mitigation—Preventing Initiative Collisions

Aviation Example: Collision Avoidance Systems

Modern aircraft are equipped with automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) systems, which allow them to communicate real-time flight data with each other. If two planes are on a collision course, these systems warn pilots, giving them time to adjust. It’s a proactive approach to risk management—problems are detected and resolved before they escalate.

Application in Change Management: Avoiding Crashes Between Initiatives

In organisations, multiple change initiatives often roll out simultaneously, each demanding employee attention, resources, and operational bandwidth. Without real-time risk monitoring, it’s easy to overwhelm employees or create operational bottlenecks. Many organisations don’t realise there’s an issue until productivity starts dropping or employees push back against the sheer volume of change.

Key Takeaways:

  • Invest in Impact Assessment Tools: Before launching an initiative, leaders should evaluate its potential impact on employees and the business.
  • Run Scenario Planning Exercises: Like pilots in flight simulators, organisations should model different change scenarios to prepare for potential challenges.
  • Set Up Early Warning Systems: AI-driven analytics can detect overlapping initiatives, allowing leaders to intervene before issues arise.

The High Cost of Inaccurate or Delayed Data

Aviation Example: The D.C. Midair Collision

The tragic January 2025 midair collision in Washington, D.C. was, in part, the result of outdated and incomplete data. A single air traffic controller was responsible for both helicopter and airplane traffic, leading to a dangerous lapse in coordination. Miscommunication about airspace restrictions only made matters worse, resulting in an avoidable catastrophe.

Poor Data Leads to Costly Mistakes

The corporate equivalent of this is when transformation teams work with old or incomplete data. Decisions based on last quarter’s reports can lead to wasted resources, poorly sequenced initiatives, and employee burnout. The consequences might not be as immediately tragic as an aviation disaster, but the financial, momentum and cultural costs can be devastating.

Key Takeaways:

  • Prioritise Frequent Data Updates: Change leaders must ensure initiative data is refreshed regularly to reflect real-time realities.
  • Collaborate Across Functions to Maintain Accuracy: Transformation leaders, HR, finance, and IT should work together to ensure all change impact data is reliable.
  • Automate Reporting Where Possible: AI and automation can reduce human error and provide real-time insights without manual effort.

Balancing Automation with Human Judgment

Aviation Example: Autopilot vs. Pilot Oversight

While modern planes rely heavily on autopilot, pilots are still in control. They use automation as a support system, but ultimately, human judgment is the final safeguard. It’s the perfect balance—automation enhances efficiency, while human oversight ensures safety.

Some leaders may find the process of collecting and analyzing data cumbersome, time-consuming, and even unnecessary—especially when they’re focused on quick execution. Gathering accurate, real-time data requires investment in tools, training, and disciplined processes, which can feel like an administrative burden rather than a value driver.

However, the benefits far outweigh the effort. A well-structured data system provides clarity on initiative progress, prevents conflicting priorities, enhances decision-making, and ensures resources are allocated effectively. Without it, organisations risk initiative overload, employee burnout, wasted budgets, and ultimately, failed transformations. Just like in aviation, where poor data can lead to fatal accidents, a lack of real-time insights in change management can result in costly missteps that derail business success.

Moreover, having an integrated process whereby data regularly feeds into decision making, as a normal business-as-usual process, builds the overall capability of the organisation to be a lot more agile and be able to change with confidence.

Navigating Change with Data-Driven Precision

Aviation has shown us what happens when decision-makers lack real-time, accurate data—mistakes happen, and consequences can be severe. In organisational change, the same principles apply. By embracing real-time data, predictive analytics, and structured governance, companies can navigate change more effectively, preventing initiative overload, reducing resistance, and maximising impact.

Ultimately, the goal is simple: Ensure your change initiatives don’t crash and burn. And just like in aviation, data is the key to a smooth landing.

To read more about managing change saturation check out How to Manage Change Saturation using this ancient discipline and How to measure change saturation

To read more about managing multiple changes or a change portfolio check out our various articles here.

If you would like to chat more about how to utilise a digital/AI solution that will equip you will insightful data to make critical business decisions in your air traffic control of your changes, reach out to us here.

The Key to Successful Transformation is Managing Organisational Energy

The Key to Successful Transformation is Managing Organisational Energy

Successful transformation is not just about having a clear strategy, the right technology, or a strong leadership team—it is about managing organisational energy effectively. Like a marathon, transformation requires a well-paced approach, allowing for the right breathing space at key milestones. Without careful attention to energy levels, organisations risk burnout, disengagement, and failure to sustain long-term change.

Understanding Organisational Energy

Organisational energy is the collective capacity of employees to take action, drive change, and sustain momentum. It encompasses physical, emotional, and cognitive dimensions, each playing a critical role in how teams navigate transformation. Unlike resources such as time and budget, energy is dynamic—it can be depleted through excessive demands or replenished through strategic interventions.

The Marathon Mindset: Pacing and Breathing Spaces

Transformation is a long journey, not a sprint. Like seasoned marathon runners, organisations must be intentional about pacing and ensuring adequate recovery points along the way. Leaders often push for rapid results, but sustained transformation requires:

  • Phased Implementation: Breaking down transformation into manageable phases with defined milestones.
  • Strategic Pauses: Allowing teams to absorb changes, reflect on progress, and recalibrate before moving to the next stage.
  • Energy Checks: Regularly assessing engagement levels, stress indicators, and feedback to adjust the pace accordingly.

Neglecting these aspects leads to fatigue, resistance, and disengagement—ultimately derailing transformation efforts.

Awareness of Existing Capabilities and Change History

Before embarking on a transformation journey, organisations must understand their baseline. Awareness of existing capabilities, ways of working, and historical transformation experiences provides predictive indicators of how change should be approached.

Key Considerations:

  • Past Change Successes and Failures: What has worked and what hasn’t? Understanding past patterns helps anticipate potential resistance or enablers.
  • Current Workload and Fatigue Levels: Are employees already stretched with existing initiatives? Overloading teams will compromise focus and execution quality.
  • Organisational Culture: Some cultures thrive on rapid change, while others require gradual adoption. Aligning transformation efforts with cultural realities is critical.

By assessing these factors, leaders can tailor transformation strategies to fit the organisation’s energy levels and capacity.

Building Organisational Stamina: Start Small, Scale Up

Just as athletes build endurance through progressive training, organisations must strengthen their transformation muscle over time. This means introducing smaller changes first to test resilience and capability before scaling up to more complex shifts.

How to Build Organisational Stamina:

  1. Start with Pilot Initiatives: Test new ways of working in controlled environments before expanding.
  2. Gradually Increase Complexity: Move from small process improvements to larger-scale changes, ensuring teams adapt successfully at each stage.
  3. Celebrate Early Wins: Recognising progress builds confidence and motivation to tackle bigger challenges.
  4. Provide Learning Opportunities: Equip teams with skills and tools that enhance adaptability and readiness for change.

Leaders who adopt this progressive approach foster a resilient workforce that can sustain transformation efforts over time.

Teams with good change leaders or those teams with significant experience with change tend to be more able to work with greater volumes of change as well as greater complexity of change. With each change initiative, with the right structure, routines (including retro), the team’s capability can be built to be ready for larger, more complex transformations.

Balancing Focus and Intensity

Attention is a finite resource. When teams are bombarded with multiple initiatives, priorities become diluted, and execution suffers. Managing focus effectively is essential to maintaining high performance during transformation.

Strategies for Maintaining Focus:

  • Limit Concurrent Initiatives: Prioritise the most critical changes and sequence others to avoid overload.
  • Establish Clear Priorities: Ensure alignment across leadership to prevent conflicting demands on teams.
  • Monitor Workload and Stress Levels: Pay close attention to employee well-being and adjust intensity as needed.
  • Encourage Deep Work: Create space for teams to focus without constant distractions or shifting priorities.

When focus is scattered, transformation efforts lose momentum. By managing cognitive load, leaders enable employees to fully engage with and execute changes effectively.

The Importance of a Clear Plan

While agile methodologies emphasise adaptability, having a structured plan provides essential clarity for employees navigating complex change. Transformation without a roadmap leads to uncertainty, anxiety, and resistance. This does not necessarily mean that plans are locked in stone and cannot be changed. In contrast to this, having a plan provides a frame of reference, and expectations can be set that details including timeline may shift but that the high level approach remains the same.

Why a Clear Plan Matters:

  • Provides Direction: Employees need to know where the organisation is headed and how they fit into the journey.
  • Reduces Uncertainty: Even if adjustments are made, a baseline plan offers reassurance and stability.
  • Enhances Engagement: When people understand the “why” and “how” of transformation, they are more likely to commit.
  • Prepares for Change: Last-minute changes create confusion and stress—early planning allows for smoother transitions.

Balancing Planning with Agility

While plans must be flexible, abandoning structure altogether creates chaos. Leaders should:

  • Communicate a High-Level Roadmap: Outline key phases and milestones without overloading with unnecessary detail.
  • Adapt Plans Responsively: Incorporate feedback and lessons learned, adjusting course without losing sight of long-term goals.
  • Engage Employees in Planning: Co-creation fosters ownership and reduces resistance.

A well-structured transformation plan provides clarity and confidence, making it easier for teams to adapt and sustain change.

To ensure the optimal management of organisational energy, measurement is essential. Organisations need clear yardsticks to assess energy levels, performance, and transformation progress, allowing leaders to make informed adjustments when needed. Without measurement, it is impossible to determine whether teams are operating at an optimal pace or experiencing fatigue and disengagement.

Key Metrics to Track:

  • Change Impact Data: Understanding the magnitude of transformation on various teams helps adjust implementation approaches.
  • Balance Energy Demand and Supply: Leaders should prioritize work strategically, focusing on high-impact initiatives while minimizing unnecessary demands. Simultaneously, they should inspire teams by articulating a compelling vision that connects the various dots across changes
  • Change Readiness Assessments: Gauging employees’ preparedness for change ensures the right support mechanisms are in place.
  • Sentiment Analysis: Regular pulse surveys and feedback loops help identify resistance, concerns, and engagement levels.
  • Performance Metrics: Tracking productivity, efficiency, and key deliverables helps align transformation with business outcomes.
  • Adoption Rates: Measuring how well new processes, tools, or ways of working are being integrated ensures long-term sustainability.

By continuously monitoring these indicators, leaders can fine-tune transformation efforts, ensuring that momentum is sustained while preventing burnout and resistance.

Leading with Energy Management

The success of any transformation effort hinges on how well organisational energy is managed. Leaders must act as stewards of energy—pacing initiatives appropriately, building stamina, maintaining focus, and providing clear direction.

By treating transformation like a marathon—strategically balancing intensity with recovery, testing capabilities before scaling, and ensuring clarity—organisations can sustain momentum and achieve lasting success. Managing organisational energy is not just a leadership responsibility; it is the foundation for thriving in an ever-evolving business landscape.

How to Prove the Value of Change Management So You Won’t Need to Justify Your Existence

How to Prove the Value of Change Management So You Won’t Need to Justify Your Existence

Transformation and change professionals often find themselves in the position of defending the value of change management. Despite the critical role that change management plays in ensuring successful project outcomes, many stakeholders remain sceptical. Some view it as a discretionary cost rather than an essential function.  Many change management centres of excellences have faced the axe or at least been downsized.  

This scepticism can be exacerbated by comments that dismisses roles such as change managers as unnecessary.  In Australia, there are even comments by a politician that positions such as change manager “do nothing to improve the lives of everyday Australians”.  The context of this comment was targeting positions related cultural, diversity and inclusions advisors, along the same lines as that driven by Trump in the United States.  This has upset a lot of change professionals as you can imagine.

To counter this, Change Management Centres of Excellence (CoEs) must move beyond advocacy and education to proactively demonstrate their tangible value. Let’s explore practical approaches to proving the value of change management, ensuring its sustained recognition and investment.

1. Leverage Empirical Research to Support Your Case

There is substantial research demonstrating that change management interventions lead to improved project outcomes. Change practitioners can use these studies as evidence to substantiate their value. For example:

Prosci Research has consistently shown that projects with excellent change management are significantly more likely to achieve their objectives compared to those with poor change management. According to the Best Practices in Change Management study, 88% of participants with excellent change management met or exceeded objectives, while only 13% of those with poor change management met or exceeded objectives. This means that projects with excellent change management were approximately seven times more likely to meet objectives than those with poor change management (Source). 

Even implementing fair change management practices can lead to a threefold improvement in project outcomes (Source).

McKinsey found that transformation initiatives are 5.8 times more successful if CEOs communicate a compelling change story, and 6.3 times more successful when leaders share messages about change efforts with the rest of the organisation (Source).

By framing change management as an evidence-based discipline, Change CoEs can strengthen their credibility and influence senior stakeholders. Furthermore, sharing industry benchmarks and case studies showcasing successful change management implementations can add weight to the argument.

2. Calculate the Financial Value of Managing a Change Portfolio

Executives prioritize financial metrics, making it essential to quantify the financial impact of change management.  This article How to calculate the financial value of managing a change portfolio provides a structured approach to calculating the financial value of managing a change portfolio. Some key financial considerations include:

  • Productivity Gains: Effective change management reduces employee resistance and increases adoption rates, leading to quicker realization of benefits. For instance, if a new system is introduced, strong change management ensures employees use it efficiently, eliminating productivity dips.
  • Cost Avoidance: Poorly managed change efforts can lead to rework, delays, and even project failures, incurring significant costs. For example, a failed system implementation due to lack of change management could require millions in additional investments to correct issues and retrain employees.
  • Revenue Acceleration: When changes are adopted swiftly and efficiently, organisations can capitalize on new opportunities faster. In industries such as retail, banking, and technology, time-to-market is critical. The faster employees and customers adapt to new changes, the sooner the organisation can generate revenue from those changes.
  • Risk Mitigation: Resistance and poor change adoption can lead to compliance risks, reputational damage, and disengagement, all of which have financial implications. A compliance failure due to lack of engagement in a new regulatory process could lead to fines and reputational loss.

To make this more tangible, Change CoEs should create financial models that quantify the cost of failed change initiatives versus successful ones. They can also track and report savings from avoided risks and improved efficiency, linking these directly to the organisation’s bottom line.

3. Demonstrate Value Through Behaviour Change

One of the most effective ways to prove the impact of change management is by tracking behaviour change. Change is not successful unless employees adopt new ways of working, and this can be measured using:

  • Adoption Metrics: Track usage rates of new systems, tools, or processes. For instance, if a company implements a new CRM system, measuring login frequency, data entry consistency, and feature utilization can indicate successful adoption.
  • Performance Data: Compare key performance indicators (KPIs) before and after change implementation. If a new customer service protocol is introduced, tracking customer satisfaction scores and response times will provide tangible insights into its effectiveness.
  • Employee Surveys: Gauge sentiment and readiness for change. Pulse surveys can reveal how confident employees feel about a transformation and whether they understand its purpose and benefits.
  • Stakeholder Feedback: Capture qualitative insights from leaders and frontline employees. Executives often rely on direct feedback from managers to gauge whether changes are being embraced or resisted.

By presenting a clear narrative that links change management efforts to observable behaviour shifts, Change CoEs can make their value more tangible. It is also beneficial to conduct longitudinal studies, tracking behaviour change over time to ensure sustained impact.

Imagine being able to present a set of behaviour metrics that are forward looking measures for benefit realisation.  This can position favourably the tangible value of change management activities and approaches.

4. Use Non-ROI Methods to Articulate Value

While financial metrics are important, relying solely on traditional ROI calculations can be limiting. There are several alternative methods in the article Why using change management ROI calculations severely limits its value:

  • Customer Experience Improvements: Measure customer satisfaction before and after change initiatives. If a change initiative improves customer interactions, metrics such as Net Promoter Score (NPS) and retention rates will reflect its impact.
  • Employee Engagement and Retention: Effective change management reduces uncertainty and anxiety, leading to better engagement and lower attrition. Organisations that manage change well see lower absenteeism and stronger workforce commitment.
  • Organisational Agility: Organisations with strong change management capabilities adapt faster to market disruptions. Companies that successfully embed change management in their DNA are more resilient during economic downturns or competitive shifts.
  • Cultural Transformation: Change management plays a key role in shaping corporate culture, which influences long-term business success. For example, embedding a culture of continuous learning can make future change initiatives easier to implement.

By framing change management as a driver of strategic outcomes, rather than just an operational function, Change CoEs can enhance their perceived value.

5.  Position change as a key part of risk management

Demonstrating the value of change management through risk management is a powerful approach for the Change CoE. By highlighting how effective change management mitigates various risks associated with organisational change, you can justify its importance and secure necessary support and resources. 

This is particularly useful and important for the financial services sector where risk is now the front and centre of attention for most senior leaders, with the increasingly intense regulatory environment and scrutiny by regulators.

Risk in Change

Change initiatives inherently carry risks that can impact an organisation’s operations, culture, and bottom line. Effective change management helps identify and address these risks proactively. By implementing a robust change risk management framework, organisations can adapt their overall risk management strategies to cover change-related risks throughout the project lifecycle. This approach allows for early identification of potential obstacles, enabling timely interventions and increasing the likelihood of successful change implementation.

Delivery Risk

Change management plays a crucial role in mitigating delivery risks associated with project implementation. While project managers typically focus on schedule, cost, and quality risks, change managers can identify and manage risks that are delivered into the business as a result of the change. By working closely with project managers, change professionals can introduce processes to minimize the potential business impact of these delivered risks during project delivery. This collaboration ensures that the project not only delivers the required change but does so with minimal disruption to the organisation.

Quantifying Risk Mitigation

To further demonstrate the value of change management, it’s essential to quantify its contribution to risk mitigation. By adapting the organisation’s risk assessment matrix or tools, change managers can determine the probability and potential impact of each identified risk. This analysis allows for prioritization of risks and implementation of appropriate mitigation strategies.

By tracking how change management interventions reduce the likelihood or impact of these risks, you can provide tangible evidence of its value to senior leadership. By framing change management as a critical component of risk management, you can shift the conversation from justifying its existence to showcasing its indispensable role in ensuring successful organisational transformations. This not only demonstrates the value of change management but also aligns it with broader organisational goals of risk reduction and strategic success.

6. Proactively Measure and Track Value Delivery

Tracking and reporting the tangible value created by change management is essential. Organisations frequently undergo leadership transitions, and new decision-makers may question the need for a Change CoE. A well-documented history of impact ensures continuity and ongoing investment.

McKinsey research indicated that Transformations that provide both initiative-level and program-level views of progress through relevant metrics are 7.3 times more likely to succeed (Source).

To achieve this:

  • Develop a Change Management Dashboard: Use KPIs to track adoption rates, employee readiness, and impact on business metrics.
  • Create Case Studies: Document success stories with before-and-after comparisons. Case studies should include challenges, change management interventions, and final outcomes.
  • Conduct Quarterly Impact Reviews: Regularly present insights to senior leaders. Demonstrating trends and ongoing improvements ensures continued executive buy-in.
  • Link Change Efforts to Strategic Priorities: Show how change management enables key business goals, such as revenue growth, market expansion, or operational efficiency.

7. Shift from Education to Results-Driven Influence

While stakeholder education is important, it has limitations. Many executives have preconceived notions about change management. Rather than relying solely on relationship-building, focus on delivering results that speak for themselves. Key strategies include:

  • Pilot Programs: Run small-scale change initiatives with measurable impact. If an executive is sceptical, a successful pilot can turn them into an advocate.  It is highly unlikely that executives will not want to see metrics that indicate how effective a change initiative is progressing.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Align with key business units to co-own change success. Partnering with Finance, HR, Risk, Operations and IT leaders can reinforce the business value of change management.
  • Agile Change Management: Deliver incremental wins to showcase immediate value. Iterative, feedback-driven approaches ensure continuous improvement and visibility.

Change management professionals must move beyond justification and actively prove their worth. By leveraging empirical research, financial calculations, behaviour tracking, alternative value measures, and proactive reporting, Change CoEs can secure their place as indispensable business functions. In a world where scepticism towards roles like change management persists, the best defence is a compelling, evidence-based demonstration of impact.