A solution demo showcases a product’s features and benefits, allowing potential customers to see it in action. It’s crucial because it creates engagement, addresses specific pain points as a part of key business objectives, and illustrates how the solution meets the audience’s needs, ultimately driving conversion rates and building trust in your offering.
Digital collaboration tool (Zoom, Hangout)
IN-PERSON
Whiteboard
Markers
Post-it notes
Timer
Instructions for running this Playbook
1. Background
Solution demo is a critical part of an agile project. It helps to demonstrate to stakeholders what the end solution could look like and ensures alignment by providing them with objective evidence of solution performance and giving them an opportunity to engage and provide feedback on what the project team has been working on.
How do you prepare for a successful solution demo?
To prepare for a successful solution demo, start by understanding your audience’s needs and pain points. Customize the demo to address these specific challenges while clearly showcasing your solution’s unique features. Practice delivering the presentation, anticipate questions, and ensure all technical aspects function smoothly to create a seamless experience.
A key gap for solution demos without change management input is one that is often focused on the technical or process features. Effective solution demos are designed with the customer needs and stakeholders’ needs in mind and is focused to help them easily picture themselves or their colleagues using the solution. The session is ideally a joint-session with the rest of the project team in designing the demo.
2. Prep
The following are critical prior to conducting the solution demo design session:
User journey – To ensure this can be referenced and utilised to illustrate the journey the user will go through in using the solution
User role profiles – To ensure that critical user profiles are clearly understood so that these can be utilised to outline their usage journeys
Change approach or Change Canvas – To help illustrate critical aspects of how users will be engaged be supported to use the designed solution
Scheduling:
Schedule the meeting when you have evidence that the solution is on track to be presented in case the solution
Include key project team members such as the project manager, business owner, lead developer and business analyst. Also include business representatives from impacted business areas.
Organisation:
Prior to the session undertake the following preparation:
Research previous solutions demos and understand key questions and concerns, especially those aspects with a people and change component (vs. technical issues)
Anticipate concerns and sentiments of targeted business representatives
Talk to business representatives to understand the history of changes that they have been through, how the group has evolved over time through changes
TIP: DESIGN
Focus as much on what a typical experience would be like from an end-user perspective versus on the technicalities of the solution itself.
Position the various scenarios and challenges that the user faces and walk through how these are resolved by the solution.
A good way to demo less technically focused solutions would be through role-plays to show what the solution looks like.
TIP: WHAT TO AVOID
The solution demo is about showing what ‘works’ in a realistic way. It should never be a powerpoint deck walk through.
Following agile principles, the focus is on ‘showing’ versus ‘telling’. The stakeholders need to be able to ‘see’ the solution versus ‘being told’ about it.
3. Run the session
Intro – 5-10 min
Walk through the purpose of the session and why this is required. Emphasise how important it is to incorporate people and change considerations within solution demo design to ensure session success.
1. Discuss overall demo design – 10 min
Overall demo agenda and run-sheet
Length of the demo (normally an hour, or 2 hours for complex solution demos)
Scope of the demo or the portions of the solution to be demo’ed
Roles of team members involved in leading the demo
2. Discuss incorporating user journeys and user profiles in demo design – 15 min
Be focused on the exact portion of the user journey you are going to demo and be precise and clear
Select key user profiles for the demo to illustrate how users will use the solution. This makes the demo much more engaging and real. Ideally use no more than 3 user profiles in most situations for the core demo. For other roles you can also talk through at a high level key usage models
Be focused on the people component in painting a picture of what each user profile is, what challenges they have, and how the solution meets those challenges
Highlight key benefits of the solution as you walk through the user journeys
3. Incorporate change approach in demo design – 10 min
Identify key change approach to call out throughout the user journey:
Focus on painting a clear picture for stakeholders throughout the user journey in how users are supported throughout the change process
Mention key change activities at key junctures of the user journey such as town hall sessions, training sessions, using sandbox to become more familiar with the solution, being supported by change champions, etc.
4. Incorporate key readiness and adoption measurement approaches – 10 min
Identify key change readiness and adoption measurement approaches and call these out and incorporate within the demo. The key is not to go overboard and focus too much on the details. Instead, highlight how solution usage is being measured and behaviours reinforced to achieve overall project objectives. For example:
Overview how change adoption is tracked during the user journey walkthrough
Highlight any behavioural reinforcements to sustain the change as a part of the user journey
Overview how change readiness is measured and reported as a part of the user journey
5. Capturing outcomes and actions required – 5 min
At the end of the session, capture key actions required, timeline required, and a follow up session as required.
What to do with the output?
After you’ve written up key agreements and solution demo run-sheet incorporating those design elements discussed, send these to various project stakeholders. Follow-up with action owners to get ready for the solution demo session.
Finding the right organisational change management software can be overwhelming and daunting. We break down some of the key steps to guide you in the right direction.
To save you feeling innundated by various vendor information, or various relevant stakeholder requests, sit back and focus on what’s the most important.
A key starting point is to decide what will make the most difference to your organisation and where the biggest pains are.
This may go against the standard Procurement process that focused on listing as many features as possible. Instead, its about core strategic focus on the top most critical change management problems.
As you start to explore different change management software solutions. These are the key questions to answer as you go along.
How do I ensure I address the right business problems?
1. Determine which transparent business problems have the biggest impact on the change management process. Key areas to look at include time savings, business value created, benefit realisation, risk assessment, employee experience, and business performance. Which aspect of change does this impact?
2. Avoid having a long and exhaustive list of business problems to address and features to look for. No one tool will address all needs, so it’s about the must-haves versus the nice to haves.
3. Prioritise the importance of various business problems and how they impact change management strategies. Ideally form no more than the top 1-3. This will help you become focused. It also ensures your efforts are targeted.
How do I find out about solutions on the market?
1. Search on Google, using popular search terms such as organisational change management software, change heatmap, single view of change, change management deliverables, enterprise change management software.
Be clear in terms of whether you are after an enterprise or portfolio level tool, or a project delivery type of tool.
2. Review change management software compilation pages such as this, or this.
3. Review any vendor presence in change management associates such as ACMP (Association of Change Management Professionals) or CMI (Change Management Institute). For example, do they have expertise in partnering with the association in developing course materials?
4. Search or ask questions on Linkedin Groups such as those for ACMP, CMI or Organizational Change Practitioners.
How do I get the budget?
To gain the budget and stakeholder approval you are looking for to invest in a change management tool, you need to ensure you have a very clear business case.
1. Estimate the size of the problem. How much cost is the problem causing? If not cost, then time saving, benefit achieved, or business performance levels impacted.
Be as quantitative as possible so that it is easy for your stakeholders to see the importance of the problem and how it aligns with the company’ss key performance indicators. If you would like to calculate the financial benefit of managing a change portfolio across change plans and types of changes visit this article.
E.g. Performance drops can be 10-20% (which can translate to millions of $) from the impact of changes. Managing change across the portfolio is one of the few ways to manage this significant risk. Read more here.
2. Identify the top stakeholders most impacted by the business problem and involve them. For example, if you are dealing with change saturation from change management activities, find the senior business leader most impacted by this pain and involve him/her in the process to gain their support.
3. Involve relevant departments that may impact the budget decision such as PMO, business heads, Procurement, IT, etc.
Some examples include:
– Cost savings in change management efforts including analyst support/resources, and manual time required in data collection, cleansing, data entry, data analysis and report production.
– Cost of business disruptions resulting from lack of data to support business decisions. We’ve found that often one individual instance of using data to make the right business decision can create millions in value
– Building business change capability through the ability to see and prepare for change, and iterate change interventions based on data
– Support speed of decision making and insight generation from weeks to minutes
How do I ensure the features will meet my needs?
1. Link desired features to your prioritised business problems. In this way you are focused on the most important features that will make the most difference for your organisation. Don’t be tempted to have a super long and exhaustive list of requirements with all aspects of change since this may increase cost, narrow down your vendor choice considerably, or worse, end up with a tool where you may not use most of the features. For examples, if the need more about workflow automation software or change project management software in coming up with templates for the change management plan for a change program, or about solving business leader problems?
2. Balance current urgent business needs with emerging business challenges. By choosing an organisational change management tool you are choosing to leverage this in the future for scalability. Be considered in understanding what is needed today, versus what may be needed in 1 or 2 years time. Ensure your change tool will support your emerging needs. For example, as you start to build more data and insights, does your tool have AI features to support trend analysis and forecasting?
3. Determine what is right for your business in terms of their change management capabilities and maturity. Depending on the tool that you select, it may support your change maturity focus in managing the impact of change initiatives. Decide not only whether the tool is easy to use for your business stakeholders (who may or may not be familiar with change management terms and practices). Also, ensure that as you build business change maturity, that the tool can continue to provide value to further the maturity.
4. Build your requirement list, again focused on must-have first before nice to haves before more advanced features. Examples include: service performance levels, data and security, risk management, ease of data access, modes of data input/export, automation, AI/machine learning, ease of integration, etc.
Which provider is the best for me?
Other than technical features and product design, there are other considerations in determining whether the software is right for you and your organisation. Here are some examples:
– How long has company been in operations for?
– What’s the background of the founder and how knowledgeable about the subject matter is he/she based on experience?
– Is there a structured onboarding process including training programs?
– Are the tangible outputs and documentation of the tool overly simplistic? And is there a range of proven analytics visuals that draw out the visibility of key risks and support different types of decision making
– What are the support channels? (e.g. self-help articles, digital Q&A support, user community, etc.)
– Is there a sandbox to trial the tool before signing up?
– How easy is it to administer and maintain? (e.g. if the org. structure changes). Are there automation features or do I need to do manual data entry?
– Must I purchase consulting along with the tool? And is it methodology agnostic?
– What is the annual system down time and what is the notification process?
– Does the tool support the capture of range of change types, including IT change management, operations changes, BAU normal changes, or standard change that happens seasonally during the year
– Do I need integration? Does it integrate with Microsoft Azure, Atlassian Jira Service Management, etc.?
– Is there continuous improvement improvement in the tool roadmap?
– Is the tool more designed for project teams, or from the lenses of business stakeholders?
– Looking at the blog section, does the provider show advanced change management understanding and experience? Or is it superficial?
– What are the AI/Automation features? How are data insights obtained? Are there potential issues if my team has low capability in analytical skills?
When is the right time?
It depends on your business priorities. Most businesses will always have multiple priorities. You need to be clear to what extent the business priority you are solving is critical to the success of your role.
For example, if the business priority is change saturation and limited capacity, then this priority will likely no go away. Even if there are other important business priorities, your role in the longer term may be measured by to what degree you have solved the organisational pains related to change.
We’ve seen lots of examples where the business directly intervenes to solve their pains, if this was not solved by the change team.
Using a software is like eating a buffet. Yes, it might take a long time to be able to sample all the various dishes and feel full and satisfied. However, you don’t need to eat everything in the buffet to start to enjoy the food. Pick your low hanging fruit, the ones that will directly address your business pain quickly. The rest, including building capability, can wait, and will take time.
Should I build in-house or buy?
Again it depends on where you are and the business problems you are trying to solve. If you have a mature change practice, and what the needs are
Be clear about the time you have to solve the business problem. What is the cost of not solving the business problem swiftly? How does this af
However, note that to build a tool in-house there are several considerations:
– Time and resources it takes to design, and continually improve the product. Like any system products it needs constant attention and resources for improvement and gradual maturity. The first iteration will usually not satisfy all your requirements
– Technical resources to design the user interface, technical development, infrastructure alignment, and testing for the product
– Ongoing total cost of ownership including technical development and support, product development, architecture support, infrastructure/system maintenance cost
– Business stakeholder resources for input and testing
– Risk of building a tool that is overly detailed and cumbersome to maintain
– Disadvantage of not being able to leverage industry best practices from constant user feedback that external tools have
As the global landscape continues to evolve, so too does the field of change management. The 2020s promises a shift in the way organizations approach change, driven by a combination of economic factors, continued technological advancements, and the ever-increasing need for adaptability. In this article, we explore the background factors influencing the upcoming changes, and delve into seven key predictions that are set to reshape the realm of change management in the coming year.
Inflation Continue to Drop: A Ray of Economic Hope
One of the pivotal factors shaping the economic landscape in mid 2020s is the anticipated drop in inflation. After grappling with economic uncertainties, organizations can breathe a sigh of relief as the pressure from rising costs eases. This economic respite paves the way for strategic investments and initiatives, creating a conducive environment for change.
Avoiding Recession: Building Resilience Through Change
The specter of recession has loomed large in recent years, casting a shadow on organizational stability. However, as we step into the mid 2020s, the concerted efforts to avoid recession is forecasted to have paid off. Organizations have become more resilient, honing their ability to weather economic storms through strategic change initiatives. This backdrop sets the stage for a transformative year in change management.
Background
Agile Change as Business as Usual
In the 2020s, the concept of Agile Change is no longer a mere ‘work in progress’ but rather an integral part of Business as Usual (BAU). Organizations have recognized the need for agility in the face of rapid change, and Agile change methodologies have transitioned from experimental to foundational. This shift represents a change in mindset, emphasizing iterative processes, collaboration, and responsiveness to evolving circumstances. After more than 10 years of agile project methodology in the market place, agile change practices are starting to become ‘the norm’.
The Rise of Adaptive/Hybrid Change Models
Building on the previous point, agility applies beyond at an ‘intra-methodology’ perspective, but also how change approaches and methodologies need to be mixed and matched to work.
The increasing pace of change demands a more flexible approach from change practitioners. The dichotomy between structure and flexibility, innovation and process-focused strategies, gives rise to adaptive and hybrid change models. The emergence of terms like “wagile” (a fusion of waterfall and agile) underscores the need for a balanced approach that combines the best of both worlds. Organizations must strike a delicate balance between structure and flexibility to navigate the complexity of modern change initiatives.
For example, in regulated business functions there may need to be quite rigid planning of exactly when the changes must take place as well as the level of consultation and engagement required. However, the actual design of different engagement, positioning and employee involvement strategies may be tested in an iterative way.
Expanding Skill Sets for Change Practitioners
To meet business needs change practitioners will need to have a broader range of skills beyond ‘people skills’. In the 2020s, the demand for change professionals with a broader skill set encompassing strategic thinking, digital/data literacy, and business acumen will continue to be on the rise. As change initiatives become more complex, practitioners must equip themselves with multifaceted skills to address the diverse challenges that emerge during the change process.
For example, stakeholders are increasingly looking for data for reporting purposes to get a clearer sense of how changes are tracking. Beyond sentiments and opinions, stakeholders are looking for adoption indicators as well as precise indications of the nature of impacts across the employee population.
The Ascendance of Change Portfolio Management
Change portfolio management will continue to gain increasing visibility and importance in the 2020s. Organizations are recognizing the need to manage change initiatives collectively, aligning them with strategic objectives. The holistic oversight provided by change portfolio management enables organizations to prioritize, monitor, and evaluate change initiatives in a comprehensive manner, ensuring that resources are optimally allocated for maximum impact.
Whilst stakeholders may not be clear of the differences between transformation, portfolio management and change portfolio management, they are clearer of the benefits required in managing people impacts, against the need to maximise business performance and change adoption.
Leveraging Change Data for Informed Decision-Making
In the evolving landscape of change management, data is no longer just a nice-to-have; it’s a necessity. In the 2020s, the norm becomes leveraging change data to make informed decisions. Organizations recognize the value of data analytics in understanding the impact of change, identifying patterns, and proactively addressing challenges. This data-driven approach enhances the efficacy of change initiatives and provides a foundation for continuous improvement.
It is no longer that the expectation for data-led decision making rests in project functions such as technical development, business analysis, testing and user-experience. Change management teams are also expected to demonstrate the impact of their work through data.
Increasing Use of Software in Change Implementation
The leverage of software in change implementation should see an uptick in the 2020s, along with general increase in software usage rates in organisations. Organizations are leveraging technology to streamline and enhance various aspects of the change management process. From change project management tools, change measurement platforms, as well as change portfolio management tools the role of software can accelerate the pace of change initiatives and supports the realisation of benefits.
AI for Change: From Wait-and-See to Full Adoption
As new technologies, Artificial Intelligence (AI technology) and machine learning for change management is no longer a ‘wait-and-see’ proposition; it’s a reality in the 2020s. In terms of use of technology, at early 2020s a lot of users have sat on the fence as others argue about the risks and data privacy and intellectual property in using AI and data security. The launch of Microsoft Co-pilot and the continued adoption of Chat GPT 4 signal a paradigm shift in how organizations approach AI. Users will over time be used to asking a chat bot, using prompts to form analysis and other AI features to augment their work. Advanced AI change tools incorporating generative AI and automation can also assist in decision-making, predictive analytics, and even virtual facilitation, revolutionizing the efficiency and effectiveness of change processes.
In addition, there will be significant interest in change management tools that have incorporated AI features, from data and trend analysis, risk analysis to recommendations on change approaches. Though the accuracy of current models of AI including ChatGPT and other OpenAI models may not be 100% accurate and may feel that there is a long way to go, natural language processing algorithms continues to improve quite quickly.
How will technology shape our lives in the next decade?
In the next decade, technology will significantly reshape our lives by enhancing connectivity, automating tasks, and enabling smarter decision-making. Advances in AI, IoT, and sustainable tech will drive efficiency and innovation, ultimately transforming industries and the way we interact with our environment and each other.
As organizations navigate the complexities of the 2020s, change management emerges as a critical linchpin for success. The predictions outlined in this article reflect an emerging shift in the approach to managing change, from the integration of Agile methodologies to the widespread adoption of AI. Change practitioners must equip themselves with a versatile skill set to thrive in this dynamic environment, where strategic thinking, digital literacy, and adaptability are paramount. As we stand on the cusp of a transformative year, organizations that embrace these predictions are poised not only to weather the winds of change but to harness them for sustained success.
Change governance maturity varies widely across organizations – from those with established PMOs and formal governance structures to others that rely on existing operational and executive forums without formal change governance setups. Change managers must tailor their influence strategies to fit this maturity spectrum while empowering governance that supports change transformation success. Here we outline practical tips and approaches relevant whether you operate within high-maturity governance or in environments still building foundational capabilities.
1. Leverage Governance Dexterity – Adapt to Your Maturity Context
For organizations with mature PMOs and governance:
Encourage maintaining cadence with purpose – weekly flash checks for quick updates, monthly value reviews to keep benefits front of mind, and quarterly strategic moments for big-picture alignment and celebration. This reduces fatigue and keeps governance tightly connected to business outcomes.
Share frameworks that provide agility within formal governance so cadence remains flexible without diminishing control. For example, leverage agile change management principles to:
Embedding lightweight, iterative review processes that emphasize timely feedback and rapid decision-making without heavy documentation or unnecessary meetings.
Using tools like RACI matrices and decision-rights grids to clarify who has authority and responsibility, so governance can flex in how often or how deeply it engages, but never loses accountability.
Allowing governance forums to scale their activity up or down based on change program phase, risk, or complexity, rather than sticking to a rigid calendar or process.
For less mature organizations without dedicated governance forums:
Propose leveraging existing operational or executive forums to introduce lightweight governance rhythms that do not overburden people. For example, brief monthly check-ins during established leadership meetings or quarterly presentation slots to highlight change progress and risks.
Use simple tools like cadence checklists or short-status emails tailored for existing leaders who may not be change specialists. Position these rhythms as value-adds to existing meetings to gain buy-in.
Practical tips:
Offer templates for flash checks and value meetings that can be easily integrated into the existing meeting culture.
Advocate building urgency without burnout by linking cadence to visible outcomes rather than just process compliance.
2. Drive Enterprise PMO & Portfolio Alignment – Fit Your Organization’s Governance Model
For organizations with established PMOs:
Partner closely with PMO and portfolio managers to ensure change work is fully integrated. Act as a bridge between change activities and portfolio governance to align priorities effectively.
Encourage shared dashboards that combine project and change metrics, giving leadership clarity on both deliverables and adoption risks.
Advocate for change governance representation in portfolio decision forums to embed change risk and opportunities in prioritization.
For organizations without formal PMOs:
Identify operational units or executive groups with portfolio oversight responsibilities and seek informal relationships with key members.
Suggest practical ways to leverage existing governance bodies for change oversight by embedding change highlights in their agenda.
Provide simple portfolio mapping or status tools that don’t require heavy infrastructure but help visualize transformation across initiatives.
Practical tips:
Offer to co-create change input templates that non-PMO forums can use to review change risk, interdependencies and impact.
Share success stories illustrating how integrated PMO-change governance drives consistent messaging and prioritization.
3. Shape Executive Reporting – From Insight to Influence
For organizations with mature reporting processes:
Help refine executive dashboards by ensuring a balance between project status and change readiness/adoption metrics.
Coach change teams to translate data into compelling narratives that highlight risks, opportunities, and decision points.
Push for reporting formats that enable proactive governance action rather than reactive compliance.
For organizations with limited or no formal executive reporting:
Influence existing executive communications by proposing change-related content for leadership newsletters, briefings, or standing meeting updates.
Develop concise, jargon-free reports that fit into current executive reading habits and spotlight what matters most.
Advocate for simple visual reporting tools, e.g., impact bar charts or risk registers that executives can quickly interpret.
Practical tips:
Provide sample executive report templates tailored for different maturity levels.
Offer coaching sessions on storytelling with data to change teams who may be new to executive reporting.
4. Champion Scenario Planning to Build Resilience
Scenario planning is a powerful tool that helps organizations prepare for uncertainty by imagining multiple plausible futures, assessing their impact, and planning appropriate responses. For change practitioners, influencing scenario planning within change governance is critical to making transformation resilient to volatile conditions and unexpected challenges.
For organizations with mature change governance and PMO structures:
Advocate for formal inclusion of scenario planning in governance cycles, such as quarterly strategy reviews or portfolio risk assessments.
Collaborate with PMO, risk, and strategy functions to develop integrated scenario frameworks that tie external uncertainties with change delivery risks.
Use structured tools and templates to develop 2-3 distinct scenarios based on critical uncertainties impacting change programs (e.g., regulatory shifts, technology adoption rates, cost pressures, market dynamics).
Ensure scenario outputs include clear implications for adoption risk, resource allocation, and contingency triggers to inform governance decision-making.
For organizations with limited formal governance:
Promote lightweight scenario planning approaches that can fit into existing forums or leadership discussions without requiring new committees.
Facilitate workshops or brown bag sessions with key stakeholders to brainstorm “what-if” scenarios that highlight risks and opportunities in their own language.
Use simple scenario templates capturing scenario description, key assumptions, impacts, and early warning signs to keep the process manageable and relevant.
Position scenario planning as a practical alternative to reactive firefighting, reinforcing its value for anticipating and mitigating disruption to change efforts.
Practical Tips for All Maturity Levels:
Focus scenario development on a small number (2-3) of meaningful scenarios that highlight material differences rather than an exhaustive list.
Use scenario planning to identify robust strategies that perform well across multiple futures, reducing overcommitment to any single pathway.
Regularly review and update scenarios to reflect new information and organizational shifts, embedding this as a governance cadence.
Engage diverse viewpoints in scenario sessions to challenge assumptions and broaden organizational readiness.
Example Scenario Planning Framework (in brief):
Step
Action
Identify Key Drivers
Pinpoint external and internal uncertainties: economic, technological, regulatory, organizational
Develop Scenarios
Build 2-3 narrative futures exploring combinations of drivers
Analyze Impact
Assess effects on change timelines, adoption, resources
Define Responses
Create contingency plans and decision points
Monitor & Update
Track relevant indicators and review scenarios regularly
5. Clarify Decision Making Authority, and Risk Appetite – Influence Without Direct Control
One of the most frequent governance pitfalls in transformation is unclear decision rights, leading to duplicated effort or “decision limbo,” which stalls progress. Change practitioners can significantly influence clarity around decision making even when not formally leading governance forums.
For organizations with high governance maturity:
Advocate for or refine delegation charters that grant clear authority boundaries across change roles and governance tiers.
Promote use of decision-rights grids paired with RACI matrices, documenting decisions by type, level, and role to eliminate ambiguity.
Encourage articulation of organization’s risk appetite in governance policies to guide decisions on escalation and investment.
Work with governance leads to socialise these tools regularly and embed them in operational processes.
For organizations with emerging or informal governance:
Educate stakeholders about the value of explicit decision clarity through workshops or short guides.
Propose simple RACI templates tailored for key initiatives to clarify roles on responsibility, accountability, consultation, and information sharing.
Introduce a basic decision-rights grid to categorize decisions (routine operational, tactical, strategic) and assign decision tiers even if informally.
Frame this work as risk mitigation: reducing delays and confusion frees leaders to focus on strategic priorities.
Practical Tips Across Maturity Levels:
Develop easy-to-use templates and cheat sheets for RACI and decision grids to distribute widely.
Use storytelling and real case examples to illustrate consequences of unclear decision-making (e.g., project delays, duplicated efforts).
Regularly revisit and update decision frameworks as governance evolves, ensuring ongoing relevance.
Encourage governance sponsors to visibly support and enforce these clarity tools.
6. Define and Promote Clear Escalation Paths
Clear escalation paths empower teams to raise concerns timely and guide issues to the appropriate governance levels without clogging decision forums or escalating unnecessarily. Change managers can champion and embed escalation discipline through influence, education, and practical tools.
For organizations with mature governance:
Collaborate with governance teams to map all escalation routes related to change risks, decisions, and resource conflicts.
Promote communication plans ensuring every contributor understands when and how to escalate – down to roles and contact points.
Incorporate escalation workflows into governance charters, RACI matrices, and decision-rights grids to reinforce paths.
Champion periodic training or refresh sessions aligned with governance cadence to maintain escalation readiness.
For organizations with limited governance forums:
Identify natural escalation points in existing leadership or operational forums and propose embedding change escalation protocols there.
Provide clear documentation and quick-reference escalation flow diagrams for frontline teams and managers.
Coach teams and middle managers on recognizing escalation triggers and the best mode of communication to avoid bottlenecks.
Frame escalation discipline as a way to safeguard both operational pace and leadership bandwidth.
Practical Tips Usable in All Environments:
Use visual flowcharts to depict escalation paths, making them highly accessible and easy to recall.
Set guidelines on what kinds of issues require escalation vs. local resolution to reduce unnecessary escalations.
Promote handling low-level risks swiftly through informal escalation while preserving formal routes for major decisions.
Encourage transparency in escalation outcomes to build trust and learning across the organization.
7. Invest in Stakeholder Education & Engagement – Be the Governance Evangelist
The success of change governance depends as much on people’s understanding and buy-in as on structures and processes. Senior change managers have a vital role in educating stakeholders, increasing governance literacy, and fostering engagement – especially in organizations where governance maturity varies or formal forums are limited.
For organizations with mature governance:
Develop formal stakeholder education programs that provide regular training on governance roles, decision frameworks, escalation processes, and how governance aligns with transformation outcomes.
Use targeted communications that frame governance benefits in terms relevant to each stakeholder group – showing “what’s in it for them.”
Implement forums like governance clinics or Q&A sessions where stakeholders can clarify their roles, raise concerns, and share governance success stories.
Collaborate with governance sponsors to visibly champion these initiatives to prevent stakeholder fatigue and increase participation.
For organizations with emerging or informal governance:
Start small with bite-sized governance literacy sessions embedded in existing communication channels such as team meetings or newsletters – keep it jargon-free and highly practical.
Translate complex governance concepts into everyday language, storytelling, and case examples that resonate with different stakeholder groups.
Identify and coach governance champions within teams who can help cascade key messages informally.
Use tools such as quick reference guides, checklists, and simplified RACI matrices to embed governance knowledge across operational levels.
Practical Tips Across All Maturity Levels:
Conduct a stakeholder governance literacy audit to understand knowledge gaps and tailor education efforts accordingly.
Develop short governance video clips or Q&A hosted by trusted leaders explaining key governance principles and benefits.
Regularly gather feedback through surveys or informal conversations to refine education efforts ensuring they meet stakeholder needs.
Emphasize the connection between good governance practices and the successful delivery of benefits, reducing resistance and increasing advocacy.
Change governance is often viewed as a formal, top-down function but, as change managers, you are uniquely positioned to influence its design and execution regardless of your direct access to governance forums. The key lies in adapting your approaches to the maturity and structure of your organization’s governance, leveraging existing forums and networks, and focusing on clear communication, collaboration, and practical tools.
By championing governance dexterity, bridging PMO and portfolio governance gaps, shaping executive reporting, embedding scenario planning, clarifying decision rights, defining escalation paths, and investing in stakeholder education, you create a foundation where governance truly supports transformation velocity, clarity, and resilience. You also create a strategic change contribution to help the organisation reach its transformation benefit goals.
Tools & Templates for Influence and Education
Cadence Checklists: Ready-to-use templates to propose weekly flash checks, monthly value meetings, and quarterly strategic reviews tailored for different governance forums and maturity.
Sample RACI Matrix & Decision-Rights Grid: Simplified versions that can be adapted for routine and strategic decisions, supporting role clarity and authority distribution.
Escalation Flow Diagram: Visual maps suitable for team briefings and leader coaching in both formal and informal governance contexts.
Stakeholder Education Plan Outline: A scalable framework for assessing needs, designing education content, and measuring engagement impact.
Is change management just a job or a career? When you clock in and clock out every day, do you ever wonder what is the purpose of all this work? Yes, implementing a successful change management methodology requires a strategic roadmap approach to change management that addresses the human side of change, with effective communication to all relevant stakeholders, and developing a change management plan to track key performance indicators and change management metrics while following best practices in organizational leadership can provide clarity and direction, helping to foster a company culture of resilience that moves beyond the status quo in various change projects, ultimately maximizing ROI from these initiatives.
How can organizations assess the readiness for change among employees?
Organizations can assess employee readiness for change through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. These methods help gauge attitudes, identify concerns, and understand potential resistance, including a lack of information. Additionally, monitoring engagement levels and feedback can provide valuable insights into how prepared employees are to embrace new initiatives and drive successful teamwork and the ADKAR change management model..
What are some challenges faced when implementing a change management strategy?
Implementing a change management strategy often encounters challenges such as employee resistance, inadequate communication, and lack of leadership support. Additionally, utilizing change management tools during insufficient training and unclear objectives can hinder progress, making it crucial to address these issues proactively to ensure successful implementation and buy-in from all stakeholders involved.
Eventually, each change deliverable contributes to the next, resulting in a detailed change plan. The change plan is a culmination of a detailed understanding.
