Change adoption is the heart of every change practitioner’s work. It’s the primary measure of whether a change initiative truly succeeds, yet, surprisingly, many organizations still fail to adequately track, measure, and manage change adoption. Without a clear understanding of how well end-users are adopting the change, it’s nearly impossible to gauge the initiative’s real impact on the business. Change adoption must be both intentional and managed, not just assumed.
If you search for change adoption on Google the top articles seem to refer to the same things. These include transition preparation, communication, training and support. The top 2 articles are by Whatif and Walkme and seem to emphasise the importance of in-app training products they offer. The Prosci article emphasise the ADKAR model on the other hand.
While common strategies for change adoption—such as communication, training, and support—are essential, these are foundational steps and not the complete formula for sustained adoption. There’s a nuanced spectrum of factors that contribute to adoption, including the type of change, the stakeholders, the organization’s capacity for change, measurement metrics, and performance management. The following insights explore these core factors and share practical strategies, bolstered by real-world examples, to help change practitioners improve adoption rates across their organizations.
1. Understanding the Type of Change
The nature of the change plays a significant role in determining how to drive adoption. A change can range from a simple update in process to a fundamental shift in behaviour, and this range requires different approaches:
– Simple Changes : Minor changes, like a new software feature or a small process tweak, may only need a basic communication update. For instance, consider an HR team implementing a new self-service portal for employees to access their pay stubs. In this case, a simple email announcement explaining how to access the feature, along with a short tutorial video, might be all that’s required to ensure adoption.
– Complex, Behavioural Changes : For more complex changes that impact behaviours or workflows, adoption strategies need to be more involved. Imagine an organization implementing a new performance review system that shifts from annual reviews to ongoing, quarterly feedback sessions. This type of change isn’t just procedural—it demands a shift in how employees and managers think about performance. Here, communication alone won’t be sufficient. It requires ongoing training, leadership modeling, reinforcement through feedback loops, and alignment with performance metrics. Regular team meetings can serve as a platform for leaders to showcase the change, while role-playing sessions can help embed the new behaviours.
Analogy : Think of the change type as similar to cooking different dishes. For a quick salad, all you need is the right ingredients and a bowl to toss them in. For a complex dish like a soufflé, you’ll need precise measurements, specific tools, and careful monitoring to ensure it doesn’t collapse. The type of change similarly determines the level of preparation and intervention required.
2. Tailoring Strategies to Stakeholder Types
Understanding your end-users or stakeholders—those directly impacted by the change—is crucial. Each group will have different engagement channels and needs, which means you can’t rely on a one-size-fits-all communication plan. To drive adoption, you need to deliver information in ways that resonate with each audience.
– Identify Effective Channels : For example, one team may prefer to discuss updates in weekly meetings, while another may respond better to monthly town hall sessions. When a global retail company rolled out a new inventory management system, the change team customized its communication and training by region. Regional managers were empowered to communicate the changes in a way that suited their teams’ preferences, whether that meant team huddles, newsletters, or one-on-one conversations. As a result, the change was embraced much more readily because each team felt that the approach was tailored to their needs.
– Build Change into Routine Communication : To make the change part of the team’s daily workflow, leverage existing channels, like monthly business reviews or quarterly updates. For instance, if sales teams have weekly performance meetings, consider incorporating brief updates about how the change (such as a new CRM feature) can benefit their sales process, along with success stories from team members.
Analogy : Think of stakeholder engagement as similar to hosting a dinner party. You wouldn’t serve the same meal to every guest without considering their preferences. Similarly, change practitioners need to “serve” the change in ways that appeal to each stakeholder group’s tastes and communication preferences.
3. Aligning with Organisational Change Capacity
Change capacity—the organization’s ability to absorb and adopt change—is a critical but often overlooked factor. The timing of introducing new changes matters, especially when the change is complex. If an organization is already handling multiple projects or transformations, adding another initiative can result in resistance or “change fatigue.”
– Manage Competing Priorities : Suppose a financial services company is simultaneously upgrading its internal software, launching a new customer-facing app, and implementing a data security compliance initiative. Launching yet another change, like a new employee recognition program, may overwhelm employees, who may deprioritize it in favour of what they perceive as more urgent projects. Change practitioners should work closely with program managers to prioritize initiatives and strategically phase them to avoid saturation.
– Change Portfolio Management : Treat change initiatives as part of a portfolio. By actively managing this portfolio, you can ensure changes are introduced in waves that the organization can absorb. Regularly review the status of active changes with stakeholders to reassess the capacity and timing. This way, your adoption efforts won’t be diluted by other competing projects.
Analogy : Imagine trying to load groceries into an already-full refrigerator. Some items will fit, but others might have to wait. The same concept applies to organizational change capacity—only so much can fit into the organization’s “refrigerator” at once before things start falling out.
4. Defining and Measuring Adoption Metrics
Effective change adoption strategies hinge on clear metrics. Without defined adoption goals and measurement tools, it’s difficult to determine if users are actually embracing the change or merely checking boxes. Metrics will vary depending on the change and should be relevant to the behaviours or outcomes desired.
– Set Clear Adoption Metrics : For example, a company introducing a new collaborative software might measure adoption through the frequency of use, the number of shared documents, or the volume of cross-departmental activity within the platform. Each of these metrics helps track actual usage and determine if employees are using the tool to its full potential.
– Gauge Awareness, Willingness, and Competency : Assess and understand stakeholder readiness for the change at hand. Do they have the awareness, motivation and know-how for the new expected behaviours? Conduct regular surveys or feedback sessions to assess where teams are on the adoption curve. This approach can highlight areas where additional support is needed, such as more coaching or stronger reinforcement from leadership.
Analogy : Think of adoption metrics like the gauges in a car’s dashboard. Each gauge (speed, fuel, engine temperature) provides specific insights into the car’s overall performance, just as adoption metrics give insights into how well a change is taking hold within the organization.
5. Ongoing Performance Management for Sustained Adoption
Adoption isn’t a “one and done” effort. It requires continuous management, monitoring, and, ideally, integration into performance management. By tracking and reinforcing adoption metrics over time, organizations can keep the change front and centre and drive deeper, lasting adoption.
– Incorporate Adoption into KPIs : Align adoption goals with KPIs to maintain visibility. For example, if the goal is to increase the use of a project management tool, set a KPI that tracks project updates within the tool. Managers can be held accountable for meeting this KPI, incentivizing their teams to incorporate the tool into their workflow.
– Regular Check-Ins and Feedback: Use data-driven insights to adjust your strategy as needed. For instance, if certain teams lag in adoption rates, consider arranging tailored training sessions or conducting one-on-one interviews to understand the barriers they’re experiencing. Continuous feedback loops allow change practitioners to refine their approach based on real-time adoption data. Performance needs to be constantly nurtured, reinforced and managed. No ‘set and forget’ approach will work.
Analogy: Sustaining adoption is like maintaining a healthy habit. Just as regular exercise requires motivation, tracking, and routine check-ins to stay consistent, ongoing performance management helps ensure that change remains a part of the organizational fabric.
Data as the Catalyst for Improved Change Adoption
Data-driven insights are game-changers for change adoption. They enable change practitioners to move beyond guesswork and implement strategies with measurable, predictable results. By leveraging analytics, organizations can identify successful tactics based on stakeholder type, change type, and historical adoption patterns.
For example, by analyzing adoption data from previous projects, a technology company could discover that smaller, incremental training sessions worked better for developers than day-long sessions. This insight could inform future adoption strategies and improve the likelihood of success for similar changes.
Utilizing data to understand what drives adoption allows change practitioners to apply these learnings across the organization, achieving more consistent and reliable outcomes. Through correlation and prediction, organizations can anticipate which approaches will work best for each type of change and tailor their strategies accordingly.
This is exactly what we’ve been doing at The Change Compass. We’ve incorporated automation and AI to provide data insights that tell you what tactics and approaches work to maximise change adoption based on data. You can also drill into what works for particular stakeholders, business units and types of changes. Data insights can also inform what volume of change may stifle change adoption.
Designing change approach and interventions should not be guess work. So far, companies try to enhance their rates of change adoption success by hiring change management specialists, together with stakeholder feedback. However, the most senior stakeholder or those with the loudest voice in the room don’t always get the outcome. These are still based on opinions, versus what has proven to work based on data. Imagine the power of implementing this across the enterprise and the ability to avoid costly mistakes and mishaps in the tens (or hundreds) of millions of investments in change initiatives per annum.
Building a Culture of Adoption
Improving change adoption is not a one-time effort but an ongoing, intentional process that combines targeted communication, stakeholder engagement, capacity planning, performance tracking, and data-driven insights. By focusing on the unique aspects of each change, tailoring strategies to specific stakeholder groups, and continuously managing performance, change practitioners can significantly increase adoption rates. Ultimately, success lies in building a culture where change is not just accepted but actively integrated into the organization’s DNA.
When change adoption becomes a measurable, manageable, and data-driven process, practitioners can guide their organizations through change with confidence and clarity, transforming resistance into resilience and integration into innovation.
Change management practitioners are often tasked with ensuring that transitions are smooth and successful. However, to truly excel in this role, it’s crucial to embrace a systems thinking approach—an understanding that organisations are complex, interconnected systems where every change, including new core business processes and new processes, can create ripple effects throughout. One of the most potent tools for fostering systems thinking is the use of change data within change portfolio management. Here, we will focus on how change data can build interconnectedness across the organisation, enhance the management of change initiatives, and ultimately improve business results.
What is systems change management and why is it important?
Systems change management involves a strategic approach to transforming complex systems, addressing underlying issues rather than just symptoms, including important internal processes. It’s crucial for fostering sustainable development, enhancing organizational efficiency, and driving innovation. By understanding interconnections within systems, organizations can implement effective solutions that lead to long-term positive impacts.
The below are some of the core principles in Systems Thinking and how they may be applied to change portfolio management through data and analysis.
Principle 1: Interconnectedness
At the core of systems thinking is the principle of interconnectedness. Organisations are not merely a collection of individual parts; rather, they consist of various components that interact in complex ways. When change is initiated in one area, it can have unintended consequences in another. For instance, a change in the sales strategy might impact customer service processes, employee motivation, and even supply chain operations. By recognising these interconnected relationships, practitioners can make more informed decisions that take the broader organisational context into account.
In fact, change impact assessment is the process of identifying and ascertaining the linkages across the system. With each change, the various impacts across different processes, people working to support those processes and the systems involved in the processes.
Principle 2: Feedback Loops
Another fundamental aspect of systems thinking is the identification and understanding of feedback loops. These loops can be either reinforcing (positive) or balancing (negative). A reinforcing feedback loop occurs when a change in one part of the system leads to further changes in the same direction, creating a cycle of growth or enhancement. For example, an increase in employee training may lead to improved performance, which in turn boosts morale and reduces turnover, further enhancing overall productivity.
Conversely, balancing feedback loops act to stabilize the system. They can dampen the effects of change, preventing extremes from occurring. Recognising these feedback mechanisms allows practitioners to leverage positive feedback loops to enhance desired outcomes while being vigilant against the negative loops that may emerge, which could undermine the change initiatives.
Here is an example of a feedback loop –
Goal: Prevent stagnation or failure by adjusting strategies based on real-time feedback.
Use case: Ensuring that deviations or resistance are managed effectively to keep the change on track.
How it works:
Collect data from employee surveys, performance metrics, and feedback sessions to understand what’s working or not.
Identify points of resistance and take corrective actions (e.g., additional training or clarifying leadership vision).
Example: If employees express frustration with new tools, gather input and refine the rollout to address concerns.
Collect data from employee surveys, performance metrics, and feedback sessions to understand what’s working or not.
Identify points of resistance and take corrective actions (e.g., additional training or clarifying leadership vision).
Example: If employees express frustration with new tools, gather input and refine the rollout to address concerns.
What are key benefits of feedback loops?
Increased adaptability: Ensures the organisation can react to unforeseen challenges during implementation.
Engaged workforce: Employees feel more involved when they see their feedback incorporated into the process.
Sustainable change: Continuous feedback ensures that change efforts stay relevant, preventing them from losing momentum or being abandoned.
Principle 3: Causality
Systems thinking also emphasizes understanding causality—how different components of the organisation influence one another. This perspective is vital in change management, as it shifts the focus from merely addressing symptoms of problems to exploring their root causes. This can be applied throughout the change lifecycle ranging from understanding the impacts across the organisation, through to anticipating resistance and motivation levels to support the change.
Here is an example of applying the principle of causality in systems thinking
Change Initiative: Implementing a New KPI-Based Evaluation System
Initial Cause: Leaders decide to replace the existing subjective performance reviews with measurable KPIs to improve accountability.
Direct Effect: Employees shift their focus to achieving their KPIs.
This change seems positive—employees now have clear, measurable targets to meet.
Ripple Effects Across the System:
Short-term unintended outcome: Employees may begin to focus only on achieving their KPIs, ignoring tasks that are not directly rewarded, such as collaboration or innovation.
Behavioural impact: Some employees might feel micromanaged or disengaged if they view the new system as rigid or unfair.
Team dynamics: Competitive behaviour between employees could increase, reducing collaboration and creating silos.
Long-term Causal Feedback:
Lower collaboration can negatively affect innovation and employee morale, leading to attrition of high performers.
A balancing feedback loop emerges when HR notices a decline in collaboration scores and recommends revising KPIs to include teamwork-related metrics.
Principle 4: Holistic Perspective
Adopting a holistic perspective is crucial in systems thinking. Instead of viewing the organisation as a set of isolated parts, practitioners should consider the organisation as a dynamic whole. This approach enables better problem-solving and decision-making by considering all relevant factors and their interactions. A holistic view facilitates a deeper understanding of how changes in one area may impact others, ultimately leading to more sustainable and effective change initiatives.
For example, An organisation is running several parallel initiatives under a broader digital transformation effort, including:
CRM System Implementation
Agile Ways of Working Initiative
Cloud Migration for Core IT Systems
Employee Upskilling Program on Digital Tools
Application of Holistic Perspective
Identifying InterdependenciesThe CRM system needs to integrate with both legacy IT infrastructure and future cloud platforms, incorporating new features to enhance user experience.
The agile transformation affects how teams work, influencing the success of the CRM project and cloud migration by demanding faster collaboration cycles.
The upskilling program needs to ensure employees are trained not only in new digital tools but also on agile practices and cloud-based platforms.
Avoiding Initiative SilosWithout a holistic view, each project might focus only on its own goals, causing schedule conflicts (e.g., IT resources are overbooked for the cloud migration and CRM deployment).
Teams might experience change fatigue if initiatives are rolled out simultaneously without coordination. For example, employees may struggle to participate in the upskilling program while also meeting deadlines for the agile rollout.
Portfolio-Level Governance and PrioritizationUsing a holistic lens, the portfolio management team can sequence projects logically. For example:
First: Migrate critical systems to the cloud to ensure the CRM implementation has a stable foundation.
Second: Begin the agile transformation to align working methods before launching cross-functional CRM initiatives.
Third: Schedule employee upskilling to ensure readiness before key milestones in the CRM and cloud projects.
Optimizing Resources and Reducing RisksViewing the portfolio holistically allows management to optimize resource allocation (e.g., sharing skilled IT personnel across cloud and CRM projects efficiently).
By aligning initiatives, the company mitigates the risk of conflicting efforts and reduces change fatigue through coordinated communication and engagement plans.
The CRM system needs to integrate with both legacy IT infrastructure and future cloud platforms.
The agile transformation affects how teams work, influencing the success of the CRM project and cloud migration by demanding faster collaboration cycles.
The upskilling program needs to ensure employees are trained not only in new digital tools but also on agile practices and cloud-based platforms.
Without a holistic view, each project might focus only on its own goals, causing schedule conflicts (e.g., IT resources are overbooked for the cloud migration and CRM deployment).
Teams might experience change fatigue if initiatives are rolled out simultaneously without coordination. For example, employees may struggle to participate in the upskilling program while also meeting deadlines for the agile rollout.
Using a holistic lens, the portfolio management team can sequence projects logically. For example:
First: Migrate critical systems to the cloud to ensure the CRM implementation has a stable foundation.
Second: Begin the agile transformation to align working methods before launching cross-functional CRM initiatives.
Third: Schedule employee upskilling to ensure readiness before key milestones in the CRM and cloud projects.
First: Migrate critical systems to the cloud to ensure the CRM implementation has a stable foundation.
Second: Begin the agile transformation to align working methods before launching cross-functional CRM initiatives.
Third: Schedule employee upskilling to ensure readiness before key milestones in the CRM and cloud projects.
Viewing the portfolio holistically allows management to optimize resource allocation (e.g., sharing skilled IT personnel across cloud and CRM projects efficiently).
By aligning initiatives, the company mitigates the risk of conflicting efforts and reduces change fatigue through coordinated communication and engagement plans.
Principle 4: Emergence
Finally, the concept of emergence in systems thinking highlights how complex behaviours can arise from simple interactions among components. The principle of emergence in systems thinking refers to the idea that when individual elements interact, new patterns or behaviours emerge that were not predictable by examining the parts alone. In change portfolio management, this means that the outcomes of managing multiple change initiatives may be different—often more complex or unexpected—than the sum of each individual change project. Emergent behaviours can create both opportunities and risks.
Scenario: Managing a Sustainability Transformation Portfolio
A large organisation launches several interconnected initiatives to become a more sustainable enterprise:
Carbon Reduction Initiative – Shift to renewable energy and reduce emissions.
Sustainable Supply Chain Project – Engage suppliers on environmental standards.
Green Product Innovation Program – Develop eco-friendly products.
Employee Engagement Initiative – Promote green behaviours among employees.
Application of Emergence
Unexpected Synergies EmergeEmployees participating in the engagement initiative start identifying operational inefficiencies, such as excess waste, leading to additional cost savings.
The green product innovation program creates a culture of experimentation that spills over into other departments, resulting in improved collaboration and faster innovation cycles across the organisation, beyond sustainability-focused efforts.
Emergent Risks and Complex InteractionsSuppliers struggling to meet new sustainability requirements may delay the sustainable supply chain project, impacting both product launches and company operations.
Employees feel overwhelmed by the number of sustainability programs and resist further change, creating unexpected resistance that spreads to unrelated initiatives, such as digital transformation efforts.
New Opportunities Emerge from InteractionsAs cross-functional teams work together, new business models emerge. For example, sales and product teams discover that green products appeal to a new customer segment, leading to revenue growth opportunities not originally anticipated in the change portfolio plan.
Collaborations with suppliers in the supply chain project uncover the potential for joint ventures focused on sustainable technology.
Employees participating in the engagement initiative start identifying operational inefficiencies, such as excess waste, leading to additional cost savings.
The green product innovation program creates a culture of experimentation that spills over into other departments, resulting in improved collaboration and faster innovation cycles across the organisation, beyond sustainability-focused efforts.
Suppliers struggling to meet new sustainability requirements may delay the sustainable supply chain project, impacting both product launches and company operations.
Employees feel overwhelmed by the number of sustainability programs and resist further change, creating unexpected resistance that spreads to unrelated initiatives, such as digital transformation efforts.
As cross-functional teams work together, new business models emerge. For example, sales and product teams discover that green products appeal to a new customer segment, leading to revenue growth opportunities not originally anticipated in the change portfolio plan.
Collaborations with suppliers in the supply chain project uncover the potential for joint ventures focused on sustainable technology.
It may not be possible to forecast or anticipate all types of employee behaviours and reactions to new changes introduced. However, engaging your stakeholders and involving them in the change process may help you identify these in advance.
The Role of Change Data in Building Systems-Thinking Within Change Portfolio Management
Change portfolio management involves overseeing a collection of change initiatives and ensuring that they align with the organisation’s strategic objectives. The integration of change data into this process can significantly enhance systems thinking capabilities.
Creating a Data-Driven Culture
One of the first steps in leveraging change data is to establish a data-driven culture. Practitioners should promote the importance of data in decision-making processes across the organisation. By providing visibility of the changes that are upcoming, they can empower employees at all levels to utilize change data in their daily work. This cultural shift fosters an environment where data becomes a common language, allowing for clearer communication about changes and their potential impacts. However, do note that different type of employees may require different type of data.
Mapping Change Initiatives
Using change data, organisations can create visual maps of their change initiatives. These maps can illustrate how different initiatives are interconnected and highlight the dependencies between them. For example, a visual representation can show how key performance indicators link to a new software implementation, relying on training programs or how changes in one department may impact others. By visualizing these relationships, practitioners can better assess the potential ripple effects of changes and make more informed decisions.
Monitoring and Analysing Feedback Loops
By actively monitoring change data, organisations can identify and analyse feedback loops in real-time and enhance user adoption. This ongoing audit analysis allows practitioners to quickly respond to emerging trends or unintended consequences, including potential performance improvements. For instance, if data shows a decline in employee productivity following a process change, practitioners can investigate and implement corrective actions before the situation worsens. By understanding these feedback loops, organisations can not only react to changes but also proactively shape their outcomes.
Causal Analysis
Incorporating change data into causal analysis enables organisations to identify the root causes of issues. Practitioners can use data analytics to explore the relationships between different components of the organisation, leading to a clearer understanding of how changes impact various outcomes. This data-driven approach allows for more targeted interventions, ensuring that efforts are directed towards addressing the underlying issues rather than merely treating surface-level symptoms.
Holistic Change Portfolio Assessment
When practitioners evaluate their change portfolio, they should adopt a holistic approach that considers the interplay between various initiatives within the change management process. By analysing change data in aggregate, organisations can identify patterns and trends that may not be visible when examining initiatives in isolation. This holistic assessment allows practitioners to prioritise initiatives that align with broader organisational goals, ultimately leading to more effective change management.
Fostering Collaborative Environments
Change data can also be a catalyst for fostering collaborative environments. By sharing insights and findings from change initiatives, organisations can create a culture of collaboration where change agents help teams learn from one another’s experiences. This exchange of information can lead to emergent solutions that drive innovation and improve the process of change outcomes. Additionally, collaborative tools and platforms can be leveraged to facilitate communication and knowledge sharing across departments.
Building Connectedness Across the Organisation
The integration of change data across different types of changes into change portfolio management fosters interconnectedness within the organisation. By emphasising the importance of data and encouraging collaboration, practitioners can create a more cohesive organisational culture that embraces change.
Enhancing Communication
Clear communication is essential for effective change management. Change data provides a foundation for effective communication about initiatives and their impacts to key stakeholders. Practitioners can use data visualizations and reports to communicate progress, challenges, and successes, fostering a sense of shared understanding across the organisation.
Breaking Down Silos
Change data can also help break down silos within the organisation. By sharing data and insights across departments, practitioners can encourage collaboration and foster a sense of unity. This interconnectedness enhances problem-solving capabilities, as diverse teams bring different perspectives to the table, leading to more innovative solutions. Issues may be pre-empted if stakeholders can pick up on impacts that may be missed for example.
Aligning Goals and Objectives
When change initiatives are informed by change data, it becomes easier to align goals and objectives across the organisation. Practitioners can use data to ensure that all initiatives are working towards the same strategic objectives, reducing the likelihood of conflicting priorities. This alignment creates a more focused approach to change management, ultimately leading to improved business results.
Improving Business Results Through Systems Thinking
The application of systems thinking through change data in change portfolio management can lead to substantial improvements in business results. By fostering interconnectedness, enhancing communication, and breaking down silos, organisations can create a more agile and responsive environment.
Increased Agility
Organisations that embrace systems thinking and utilize change data are better equipped to respond to changes in the external environment. By understanding the interconnectedness of their initiatives, practitioners can pivot quickly in response to emerging trends or challenges. This agility is essential in today’s fast-paced business landscape.
Enhanced Employee Engagement
When employees see their work as part of a larger, interconnected system, they are more likely to feel engaged and motivated. By involving employees in the change process and using data to demonstrate the impact of their contributions, organisations can foster a sense of ownership and commitment to change initiatives.
Improved Decision-Making
Systems thinking promotes better decision-making by encouraging practitioners to consider the broader context of their actions. When decisions are informed by change data, organisations can identify potential consequences and make choices that align with their strategic goals. This improved decision-making ultimately leads to more successful change outcomes.
Sustainable Change Initiatives
Finally, the application of systems thinking and change data can lead to more sustainable change initiatives. By focusing on root causes, leveraging feedback loops, and fostering collaboration, organisations can implement changes that are not only effective in the short term but also sustainable over time. This sustainability is crucial for long-term business success.
Change data is a powerful lever that change management practitioners and business leaders can use to foster systems thinking within their organisations. By recognising the interconnectedness of change initiatives, understanding feedback loops, exploring causality, adopting a holistic perspective, and nurturing environments for emergence, organisations can improve their approach to change management solutions. Through these efforts, practitioners can build connectedness across the organisation, ultimately enhancing how change is managed and driving improved business results, as well as ensuring the success of that change. Embracing systems thinking in change portfolio management is not just a best practice; it’s a necessity for organisations seeking to thrive in an ever-evolving business landscape.
Change managers are not just facilitators of change transition; they are strategic partners who must understand and navigate complex organisational landscapes. One key skill that is often under-emphasised in this role is analytical capability. By adopting a strategic consultant’s mindset and employing robust analytical skills, change managers can significantly enhance their effectiveness throughout the project lifecycle. Let’s explore how change managers can leverage analytical skills at each phase of the project lifecycle, emphasising frameworks like MECE and TOSCA to drive successful change initiatives.
The Importance of an Analytical Lens
Change management involves facilitating transitions while ensuring that stakeholders are engaged and informed. However, to do this effectively, change managers must analyse complex data sets, identify patterns, and make informed decisions based on evidence. This analytical lens can be applied through every stage of the project lifecycle: commencement, planning, execution, monitoring, and closure.
Gone are the days when change practitioners are making recommendations ‘from experience’ or based on stakeholder input or feedback. For complex transformation, stakeholders now (especially senior stakeholders) demand a more rigorous, data-driven approach to drive toward solid change outcomes.
1. Project Commencement Phase
At the project commencement phase, the groundwork is laid for the entire change initiative. Change managers need to scan the organizational environment through the lens of impacted stakeholders, gathering relevant information and data.
Example: Consider a company planning to implement a new customer relationship management (CRM) system. The change manager should begin by analysing the existing state of customer interactions, assessing how the change will impact various departments such as sales, marketing, and customer service. This involves conducting stakeholder interviews, reviewing existing performance metrics, and gathering feedback from employees.
Using a MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) framework, the change manager can categorize stakeholder concerns into distinct groups—such as operational efficiency, user experience, and integration with existing systems—ensuring that all relevant factors are considered. By identifying these categories, the change manager can articulate a clear vision and define the desired end state that resonates with all stakeholders.
The above is from Caseinterview.com
Hypothesis: Sales Team Will Resist the New CRM System Due to Lack of Training and User-Friendliness
Step 1: Identify the Hypothesis
Hypothesis: The sales team will resist the new CRM system because they believe it is not user-friendly and they fear insufficient training.
Step 2: Break Down the Hypothesis into MECE Categories
To validate this hypothesis, we’ll break it down into specific categories that are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. We’ll analyse the reasons behind the resistance in detail.
Categories:
User Experience Issues
Complexity of the Interface
Navigation Difficulties
Feature Overload
Training and Support Concerns
Insufficient Training Programs
Lack of Resources for Ongoing Support
Variability in Learning Styles
Change Management Resistance
Fear of Change in Workflow
Previous Negative Experiences with Technology
Concerns About Impact on Performance Metrics
Step 3: Gather Data for Each Category
Next, we need to collect data for each category to understand the underlying reasons and validate or refute our hypothesis.
Category 1: User Experience Issues
Data Collection:
Conduct usability testing sessions with sales team members.
Administer a survey focusing on user interface preferences and pain points.
Expected Findings:
High rates of confusion navigating the new interface.
Feedback indicating that certain features are not intuitive.
Category 2: Training and Support Concerns
Data Collection:
Survey the sales team about their current training needs and preferences.
Review existing training materials and resources provided.
Expected Findings:
Many team members express a need for more hands-on training sessions.
A lack of available resources for ongoing support after the initial rollout.
Category 3: Change Management Resistance
Data Collection:
Conduct focus groups to discuss fears and concerns regarding the new system.
Analyse historical data on previous technology implementations and employee feedback.
Expected Findings:
Employees voice concerns about how the CRM will change their current workflows.
Negative sentiments stemming from past technology rollouts that were poorly managed.
Step 4: Analyse Data Within Each Category
Now that we have gathered the data, let’s analyse the findings within each MECE category.
Analysis of Findings:
User Experience Issues:
Complexity of the Interface: Usability tests reveal that 70% of sales team members struggle to complete certain tasks in the CRM.
Navigation Difficulties: Survey responses show that 80% find one step of the navigation counterintuitive, leading to frustration.
Training and Support Concerns:
Insufficient Training Programs: Surveys indicate that only 40% of employees feel adequately trained to use this part of the new system.
Lack of Resources for Ongoing Support: Focus groups reveal that team members are unsure where to seek help after the initial training.
Change Management Resistance:
Fear of Change in Workflow: Focus group discussions highlight that 60% of participants fear their productivity will decrease with the new system, at least during the post Go Live period.
Previous Negative Experiences: Historical data shows that past technology rollouts had mediocre adoption rates due to insufficient support, reinforcing current fears.
Step 5: Develop Actionable Recommendations
Based on the analysis of each category, we can create targeted recommendations to address the concerns raised.
Recommendations:
User Experience Issues:
Conduct additional usability testing with iterative feedback loops to refine the CRM interface before full rollout.
Simplify the navigation structure based on user feedback, focusing on the most frequently used features.
Training and Support Concerns:
Develop a comprehensive training program that includes hands-on workshops, tutorials, and easy-to-access online resources.
Establish a dedicated support team to provide ongoing assistance, ensuring team members know whom to contact with questions.
Change Management Resistance:
Implement a change management strategy that includes regular communication about the benefits of the new system, addressing fears and expectations.
Share success stories from pilot programs or early adopters to demonstrate positive outcomes from using the CRM.
By following this detailed step-by-step analysis using the MECE framework, the change manager can thoroughly investigate the hypothesis regarding the sales team’s resistance to the new CRM system. This structured approach ensures that all relevant factors are considered, enabling the development of targeted strategies that address the specific concerns of stakeholders. Ultimately, this increases the likelihood of successful change adoption and enhances overall organizational effectiveness.
Data-Driven Decision Making:
At this stage, change managers should work closely with the project sponsor and project manager to determine effective positioning. A data-driven approach allows the change manager to form a hypothesis about how the change will impact stakeholders. For instance, if data suggests that the sales team is particularly resistant to change, the manager might hypothesize that this resistance stems from a lack of understanding about how the new CRM will enhance their workflow.
2. Planning Phase
Once the project is initiated, the planning phase requires detailed strategy development. Here, analytical skills are essential for conducting stakeholder analysis and impact assessments.
Example: In our CRM implementation scenario, the change manager must analyse the data collected during the commencement phase to identify the specific impacts on different departments. This involves grouping and sorting the data to prioritize which departments require more extensive support during the transition.
Using the TOSCA (Target, Objectives, Strategy, Constraints, Actions) framework provides a structured approach to guide the change management process for the CRM implementation. This framework helps clarify the overall vision and specific steps needed to achieve successful adoption. Below is a detailed exploration of each component:
1. Target
Definition: The target is the overarching goal of the change initiative, articulating the desired end state that the organization aims to achieve.
Application in CRM Implementation:
Target: Improve customer satisfaction and sales efficiency.
This target encapsulates the broader vision for the CRM system. By focusing on enhancing customer satisfaction, the organization aims to create better experiences for clients, which is crucial for retention and loyalty. Improving sales efficiency implies streamlining processes that enable sales teams to work more effectively, allowing them to close deals faster and serve customers better.
2. Objectives
Definition: Objectives are specific, measurable outcomes that the organization intends to achieve within a defined timeframe.
Application in CRM Implementation:
Objectives: Increase customer retention by 20% within a year.
This objective provides a clear metric for success, enabling the organization to track progress over time. By setting a 20% increase in customer retention as a target, the change manager can align training, support, engagement and system adoption with this goal. This objective also allows for measurable evaluation of the CRM’s impact on customer relationships and retention efforts.
3. Strategy
Definition: The strategy outlines the high-level approach the organization will take to achieve the objectives. It serves as a roadmap for implementation.
Application in CRM Implementation:
Strategy: Implement phased training sessions for each department, with tailored support based on the unique impacts identified.
This strategy emphasizes a thoughtful and structured approach to training, recognizing that different departments may face distinct challenges and needs when adapting to the new CRM. By rolling out training in phases, the organization can focus on one department at a time, ensuring that each team receives the specific support they require. Tailoring the training content based on the unique impacts identified earlier in the MECE analysis helps maximize engagement and effectiveness, addressing concerns about usability and fostering greater adoption of the CRM.
4. Constraints
Definition: Constraints are the limitations or challenges that may impact the successful implementation of the strategy. Recognizing these upfront allows for better planning and risk management.
Application in CRM Implementation:
Constraints: Limited budget and time restrictions.
Acknowledging these constraints is critical for the change manager. A limited budget may affect the types of training resources that can be utilized, such as hiring external trainers or investing in advanced learning technologies. Time restrictions might necessitate a more rapid rollout of the CRM system, which could impact the depth of training provided. By recognizing these constraints, the change manager can plan more effectively and prioritize key areas that will deliver the most value within the available resources.
5. Actions
Definition: Actions are the specific steps that will be taken to implement the strategy and achieve the objectives.
Application in CRM Implementation:
Actions: Develop a communication plan that includes regular updates and feedback mechanisms.
This action focuses on the importance of communication throughout the change process. A well-structured communication plan ensures that all stakeholders, particularly the sales team, are kept informed about the implementation timeline, training opportunities, and how their feedback will be incorporated into the process. Regular updates foster transparency and help build trust, while feedback mechanisms (such as surveys or suggestion boxes) allow team members to voice concerns and share their experiences. This two-way communication is essential for addressing issues promptly and reinforcing a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement.
By applying these frameworks, change managers can make informed recommendations that align with organizational objectives. This structured approach helps ensure that all relevant factors are accounted for and that stakeholders feel included in the planning process.
3. Execution Phase
As the project moves into the execution phase, the change manager must remain agile, continually collecting organizational data to confirm or reject the hypotheses formed during the planning stage.
Example: In an agile setting, where iterative processes are key, the change manager should implement mechanisms for ongoing feedback. For instance, after each sprint of CRM implementation, the manager can gather data from users to assess how well the system is being received. Surveys, usage analytics, and focus groups can provide rich insights into user experiences and pain points.
This ongoing data collection allows change managers to adjust their strategies in real-time. If feedback indicates that certain features of the CRM are causing confusion, the change manager can pivot to provide additional training or resources targeted specifically at those areas. This iterative feedback loop is akin to the work of strategic consultants, who continuously assess and refine their approaches based on empirical evidence.
Example in Practice: Imagine a situation where the sales team reports difficulties with the new CRM interface, leading to decreased productivity. The change manager can analyse usage data and user feedback to pinpoint specific issues. This data-driven insight can guide the development of targeted training sessions focusing on the problematic features, thus addressing concerns proactively and fostering user adoption.
4. Monitoring Phase
Monitoring the change initiative is crucial for ensuring long-term success. Change managers need to analyse performance metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation and its impact on the organization.
Example: For the CRM project, key performance indicators (KPIs) such as sales conversion rates, customer satisfaction scores, and employee engagement levels should be monitored. By employing data visualization tools, change managers can easily communicate these metrics to stakeholders, making it clear how the change initiative is progressing.
A fact-based approach to analysing these metrics helps in making informed decisions about any necessary adjustments. If, for instance, customer satisfaction scores are declining despite an increase in sales, the change manager may need to investigate further. This might involve conducting interviews with customers or analysing customer feedback to identify specific areas for improvement.
Suppose the organization observes a drop in customer satisfaction scores following the CRM implementation. The change manager could work with other stakeholders to conduct a root cause analysis using customer feedback and service interaction data to identify patterns, such as longer response times or unresolved issues. By addressing these specific problems, the change manager can refine the CRM processes and enhance overall service quality.
5. Closure Phase
The closure phase involves reflecting on the outcomes of the change initiative and drawing lessons for future projects. This is where the analytical skills of change managers can shine in assessing the overall impact of the change.
Example: After the CRM system has been fully implemented, the change manager should conduct a comprehensive review of the project along with the project team (retro). This involves analysing both qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether the initial objectives were met. Surveys can be distributed to employees to gather feedback on their experiences, while sales data can be analysed to determine the financial impact of the new system.
Using frameworks like MECE can help in categorizing the lessons learned. For instance, feedback could be sorted into categories such as user experience, operational efficiency, and overall satisfaction, allowing the change manager to develop clear recommendations for future initiatives.
Lessons Learned: If the analysis shows that certain departments adapted more successfully than others, the change manager could investigate the factors contributing to this variance. For example, departments that received more personalized support and training may have demonstrated higher adoption rates. This insight can inform strategies for future change initiatives, emphasizing the importance of tailored support based on departmental needs.
Building Relationships with Senior Leaders
In addition to the technical aspects of change management, the ability to communicate effectively with senior leaders is crucial. Seasoned change managers must clearly understand organizational objectives and be able to articulate how the change initiative contributes to these goals.
Example: During discussions with senior leadership, a change manager along with the rest of the project team can present data showing how the CRM system has improved customer retention rates and increased sales. By positioning this information in an easily understandable and rigorous manner, the change manager demonstrates the value of the initiative and its alignment with broader organizational objectives.
Effective communication ensures that leaders remain engaged and supportive throughout the change process, increasing the likelihood of success. By continuously linking the change initiative to organizational goals, change managers can build trust and credibility with stakeholders at all levels.
Leveraging Analytical Frameworks
Throughout the project lifecycle, incorporating structured analytical frameworks can enhance the decision-making process. Here are two key frameworks that change managers can leverage:
MECE Framework
MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) helps in breaking down complex information into manageable parts without overlap. By ensuring that all categories are covered without redundancy, change managers can identify all relevant factors affecting the change initiative.
TOSCA Framework
TOSCA (Target, Objectives, Strategy, Constraints, Actions) provides a comprehensive roadmap for change initiatives. By clearly defining each component, change managers can develop coherent strategies that align with organizational goals. This framework not only clarifies the change strategy but also ensures that all team members understand their roles in achieving the objectives.
Continuous Learning and Adaptation
Change management is not a static process; it requires continuous learning and adaptation. As organizations evolve, change managers must stay attuned to emerging trends and best practices in the field. This involves seeking feedback, conducting post-project evaluations, and staying updated on analytical tools and methodologies.
Change managers can attend workshops, participate in industry conferences, and engage with professional networks to enhance their analytical skills and learn from peers. By sharing experiences and insights, change managers can refine their approaches and incorporate new strategies that drive successful change.
The Transformative Power of Analytical Skills
The role of a change manager is multifaceted and requires a broad range of skills. However, one skill that stands out as particularly critical is the ability to think analytically. By adopting a strategic consultant’s mindset and applying analytical skills at each phase of the project lifecycle, change managers can significantly enhance their effectiveness.
From project commencement to closure, employing frameworks like MECE and TOSCA allows change managers to approach challenges in a structured way, making informed decisions that drive successful change. Continuous data collection, stakeholder engagement, and effective communication with senior leaders are essential components of this analytical approach.
In an era where organizations must adapt quickly to change, the ability to analyse complex data sets and derive actionable insights will distinguish successful change managers from the rest. Emphasizing this critical skill not only positions change managers as strategic partners within their organizations but also ensures that change initiatives lead to lasting, positive transformations.
As change practitioners, let us elevate our analytical capabilities and drive impactful change with confidence and clarity. By embracing this essential skill, we can navigate the complexities of organizational change and lead our teams toward a successful future.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of financial services, organisations face significant challenges due to regulatory and technological changes. A large financial services corporation has recognised the need for an integrated approach to change management reporting, embedding it within general business reporting to enhance organisational agility and effectiveness. This case study outlines the firm’s journey, challenges faced, solutions implemented, and the resulting value derived from this strategic initiative.
Background
The corporation operates under a defederated model of change management, where change practitioners are distributed across various business units. This structure has led to inconsistent change management practices and reporting, complicating the ability to provide comprehensive insights into organisational change efforts. As regulatory demands and technological advancements have intensified, the need for cohesive change management reporting became paramount.
Challenges
The primary challenges encountered by the centralized change management team included:
Diverse Reporting Preferences: Different stakeholders and divisions within the organization exhibited varying preferences for reporting formats and metrics. This lack of consensus hindered the development of a standardized reporting framework.
Maturity Disparities: Business units displayed varying levels of maturity in their change management practices, with some units showing strong interest while others remained indifferent.
Feedback Variability: Initial attempts to socialize various reporting types received mixed feedback, complicating efforts to establish a unified approach.
Solution Implementation
To address these challenges, the change management team adopted a multi-faceted strategy:
Executive Engagement: The team actively engaged with senior executives to align on the direction for change management reporting. A senior executive cohort was formed to define essential reporting needs and establish a common vision.
Collaboration with Business Intelligence (BI) Team: The change management team partnered with the BI team to integrate change management metrics into existing general business reports. This collaboration ensured that change management insights were included in routine business tracking.
Data Integration: Utilising data from Change Compass facilitated the ongoing production of comprehensive reports that combined operational metrics with change management insights.
Value Realized
The integration of change management reporting into general business reporting yielded several significant benefits:
Increased Leadership Focus: By embedding change metrics within standard business reports, leaders began to prioritize change management as part of their strategic oversight. This shift is expected to enhance readiness and adoption of future changes across the organization.
Proactive Change Support: Business leaders increasingly requested support for change initiatives, indicating a transition from a push model (where support is offered) to a pull model (where support is actively sought).
Enhanced Reporting Consistency: The establishment of a standardized set of reports improved clarity and consistency in how change initiatives were tracked and communicated across business units.
Change management Maturity: Enhancing change management maturity within the business is general done through capability development and coaching. However, this case showcases that embedding change management within general business management is a strategic way to raise awareness, visibility, and through this enhance the business’ efforts to improve the management of change.
This case study illustrates how a large financial services corporation successfully embedded change management reporting into its general business reporting framework. By engaging senior leadership, collaborating with data teams, and standardising metrics, the organisation not only improved its reporting capabilities but also fostered a culture that values proactive engagement with change initiatives. As a result, the firm is better positioned to navigate future changes while ensuring that it meets regulatory demands and capitalizes on technological advancements.
In the realm of organizational change management, the concept of a Single View of Change (SVOC) has become a focal point for experienced change practitioners. This approach aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on the myriad changes occurring within an organization, thereby facilitating informed decision-making among stakeholders. However, while the SVOC is often lauded for its potential to deliver a holistic picture of change impacts, its practical implementation raises several critical questions.
The Allure of a Single View of Change
The SVOC is designed to offer change practitioners a unified lens through which to view all organizational changes—be they strategic, operational, or cultural. By consolidating information about various changes, practitioners hope to present stakeholders with a clear and coherent narrative that captures the overall impact on the organization. This is particularly valuable in environments characterized by rapid change, where stakeholders may struggle to keep track of multiple initiatives.
Concept Illustration: The Change Landscape
Imagine an organization as a bustling city. Each building represents a different initiative or project, while the streets symbolize the pathways through which information flows. In this analogy, the SVOC acts as an aerial view of the city—providing insights into how each building interacts with others and how traffic (information) moves between them. This perspective allows stakeholders to see not just individual projects but also their collective impact on the organization.
The Realities of Implementation
Despite its theoretical appeal, achieving a Single View of All Changes may be unrealistic for many organizations. In practice, organizations often grapple with hundreds of concurrent changes, some of which may be deemed too minor or insignificant to warrant inclusion in a comprehensive overview. The administrative burden associated with capturing and maintaining this data can be substantial, leading some practitioners to question whether the effort is justified. One of the few ways to achieve this is through digital means.
Example: Too Many Changes
Consider a technology firm undergoing multiple changes simultaneously: launching a new product line, implementing an agile methodology, and restructuring its sales team. Each initiative generates its own set of data points—feedback from customers, team performance metrics, and employee satisfaction surveys. If the firm attempts to capture every detail from each initiative for its SVOC, it may end up drowning in data without gaining actionable insights.
So, what information to capture, and the methodology of capturing the information is critical. Again, digital solutions can help to automate the process, which means it can be faster and easier to capture and utilise the information.
The Cost-Benefit Analysis
Organizations must weigh the benefits of creating an SVOC against the costs involved. Practitioners should ask themselves:
What is the purpose of the SVOC?
Who are the primary stakeholders?
What decisions will be informed by this view?
If the answers indicate minimal value for certain changes or stakeholders, it may be more pragmatic to focus on high-impact initiatives rather than attempting to capture every nuance. However, if the organisation’s changes are mainly business-as-usual changes, then leaving this out will mean that the picture is no longer accurate.
To read more about calculating the financial benefits of managing a change portfolio check out this article.
Diverse Stakeholder Needs
Different stakeholders have varying requirements when it comes to understanding change:
Senior Executives: Typically prefer high-level summaries that align with strategic objectives. They seek key insights into risks and mitigations without being bogged down by granular details.
Operational Leaders: Often desire a more detailed view that includes specific impacts on daily operations and resource allocation. They may require insights down to the minute level to effectively manage their teams.
Example: Tailored Reporting
A financial services company might have different reporting needs based on stakeholder roles:
Department Heads receive weekly reports detailing project timelines, resource allocations, and immediate operational impacts.
By tailoring reports in this manner, organizations can ensure that each stakeholder receives relevant information without overwhelming them with unnecessary details.
Visual Communication Strategies
The selection of visuals plays a crucial role in conveying the right message to stakeholders. Effective visual communication should:
Allow for Flexible Drill-Downs
Stakeholders should be able to explore data at varying levels of granularity—aggregating macro-level views or drilling down into specifics as required. For example:
A senior executive might want an overview of change impacts across departments.
An operations manager may wish to drill down into specific team metrics related to a new process implementation.
Facilitate Easy Switching
Different stakeholders may prefer different types of visuals. Providing options for visual switching can enhance engagement and ensure that each stakeholder receives information in their preferred format.
Example: Interactive Dashboards
Using interactive dashboards can allow stakeholders to switch between different visual representations effortlessly. They enable stakeholders to engage with data meaningfully while catering to their individual preferences:
Heat Maps can show areas of high change impact at a glance.
Gantt Charts can provide timelines for specific initiatives.
Pie Charts can illustrate resource allocation across departments (if there are significant quantitative differences across each piece of the pie, or else the pie chart can be incredibly difficult to read for the audience. Check out this article to read more about this).
The Role of Technology
In today’s complex change environments, leveraging technology becomes increasingly critical. The sheer volume of data generated by ongoing changes can overwhelm traditional analysis methods. Here, artificial intelligence (AI) and live forecasting can serve as invaluable tools:
Automation
Utilizing AI can streamline data collection and analysis processes, reducing the need for extensive manual oversight. For instance:
Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms can analyze employee feedback from surveys or social media platforms to gauge sentiment regarding ongoing changes.
Automated reporting tools can generate real-time updates on project statuses without requiring manual input from team members.
Forecasting Capabilities
Live forecasting tools can provide real-time insights into potential impacts and outcomes, enabling practitioners to make proactive adjustments. For example:
A manufacturing company might use predictive analytics to forecast how changes in supply chain management will affect production schedules.
A healthcare organization could employ simulation models to assess how new policies will impact patient care delivery.
Example: AI Implementation in Change Management
Consider a global retail chain implementing AI-driven analytics during its digital transformation efforts:
Data Collection: AI tools generates various change data including change impacts, communication plan, stakeholder assessment, etc.
Analysis: Machine learning analyses the data and calls out key data observations, trends, outliers, and patterns.
Reporting: Stakeholders receive tailored reports and dashboards showing an integrated view of what upcoming changes there are, and highlighting key risks and actions required.
This approach not only saves time but also enhances decision-making by providing actionable insights based on real-time data. However, note that currently AI will not be able to do everything. The change practitioner still needs to be able to analyse generated data and amend as needed, prioritise and select key data observations for reporting, and provider editorial oversight on what key messages should go out to the various types of stakeholders.
Understanding Stakeholder Challenges
Change practitioners must develop an acute ability to read their stakeholders’ business challenges and tailor their communications accordingly. This involves:
Tailoring Data Presentations
Adjusting the types of data shared based on stakeholder roles and responsibilities is crucial. For example:
A project manager might need detailed timelines and resource allocations for specific initiatives.
A finance officer may require cost-benefit analyses and benefit realisation forecast linked to adoption rates related to ongoing changes.
Customising Visuals
Selecting visuals that resonate with specific stakeholder concerns while remaining aligned with overarching organizational goals is essential for effective communication. Using storytelling techniques in presentations can help convey complex information more effectively:
Contextualize Data: Start with a narrative that outlines why changes are necessary.
Visualize Impact: Use graphs or infographics to illustrate projected outcomes.
Call-to-Action: Conclude with specific actions required from stakeholders based on insights presented.
By framing data within a narrative context, practitioners can foster greater engagement and understanding among stakeholders.
Trial and error
A lot of your stakeholder may not know what they want. They are not change management experts so they may not be able to tell you exactly what the outputs look like. Often they may tell you at a high level the type of data they are after, but not the specifics.
You need to be able to carefully balance giving them something that will hit the mark, as a ‘test’ (since you may not hit the mark the first time). A bit of trial and error is required in this process as you continually test with your stakeholders what resonates and what gets their attention and drives action.
This can cause a lot of frustration and anxiety for change practitioners. After all, you are doing your very best to deliver something that is requested. But again, your audience does not know exactly what they want. There is an element of you guiding them, but also the other element of directly giving them what they are looking for.
Do note that if you don’t hit the mark too many times you may lose their interest, and therefore the opportunity to present change management data. This means that you may only have a small window of opportunity. Digital tools can help you with selecting the right visuals for the right stakeholders.
Facilitating Governance Forums
Creating spaces where stakeholders can discuss insights derived from change data allows for collaborative decision-making:
Regular Business Meetings: Schedule governance forums where stakeholders review progress on key initiatives.
Interactive Discussions: Encourage open dialogue about challenges faced during implementation.
Action-Oriented Outcomes: Ensure meetings conclude with clear action items based on insights shared.
Addressing Change Fatigue
One significant challenge in managing change is addressing change fatigue, which occurs when employees feel overwhelmed by constant organizational shifts. Symptoms include:
Apathy
Burnout
Increased resistance
To combat this phenomenon, organizations must implement strategies that foster resilience among employees:
Engagement Initiatives
Actively involving employees in the change process allows them to voice concerns and contribute solutions:
Feedback Mechanisms: Implement regular surveys or focus groups where employees can share their thoughts on ongoing changes.
Recognition Programs: Celebrate small wins related to change initiatives to maintain morale.
Transparent Communication
Maintaining open lines of communication regarding what changes are occurring and why they matter helps mitigate feelings of uncertainty among employees:
Regular Updates: Provide frequent updates through newsletters or town hall meetings.
Clear Messaging: Ensure messaging is consistent across all channels to avoid confusion.
Learning and Support
Providing resources that equip employees with the skills needed to navigate changes effectively is vital for reducing resistance:
Skill Development Workshops: Offer training sessions focused on new processes or technologies being implemented.
Mentorship Programs: Pair employees with mentors who have successfully navigated similar changes in the past.
The concept of a Single View of Change holds considerable promise for enhancing stakeholder understanding in dynamic organizational environments. However, its successful implementation hinges on recognizing the diverse needs of stakeholders and tailoring communications accordingly. By leveraging technology and fostering an environment conducive to engagement and support, change practitioners can create a more effective framework for managing organizational change. In summary, while striving for an SVOC may seem aspirational, it is essential for change practitioners to remain pragmatic about its execution—balancing ambition with realism to meet stakeholder needs effectively.
As organizations continue evolving in response to market demands and internal dynamics, understanding how best to communicate change becomes paramount. The Single View of Change offers a powerful toolset; however, it requires thoughtful consideration regarding stakeholder needs, technological integration, and ongoing adaptability in communication strategies. By embracing these principles, organizations not only enhance their capacity for effective change management but also cultivate resilience among their workforce—ultimately positioning themselves for sustained success in an ever-changing landscape.
As a change management practitioner, your mission is to guide organisations through change, building their ability to manage transitions effectively and sustainably. A major part of this work often involves helping organisations develop their “change maturity” — the capacity to continuously and successfully deliver change. Many experienced change practitioners focus on moving organisations along this maturity curve, seeing it as a vital part of creating a culture that embraces and sustains transformation.
However, in this pursuit, there’s a potential risk: becoming too fixated on achieving “change maturity” can cloud your judgment about what the organisation really needs. You may find yourself caught up in the desire to build structured change processes, educate stakeholders on every change theory, or create complex frameworks to assess and elevate change capability. While these elements are important, an over-reliance on them can impede progress. In some cases, your organisation might be more capable of managing change than you think, but your approach could be holding them back.
There are several common areas where change practitioners may become too focused on change maturity — and how this focus can actually hinder their ability to support successful, meaningful change. We’ll delve into how overemphasising change terminology, processes, structures, and risk-averse approaches can become obstacles to progress. By understanding and addressing these potential pitfalls, you can better align your support with the unique needs and readiness of your organisation, enabling a smoother, more effective path to support successful change.
Are You Too Quick to Label Your Organisation as Change Immature?
One of the first traps experienced change practitioners might fall into is quickly labeling their organisation as “change immature.” It’s tempting to assess an organisation’s change capability through the lens of formal change frameworks and models, but by doing so, you may be discounting their informal ability to adapt to change.
In other words, is your ‘label’ placed on the organisation a potential self-fulfilling prophecy? For example, if you see the organisation as mildly change mature, your approach and lens may all be geared around this label and expectation.
Organisations that have not formally defined their change management processes or have not made concerted efforts to assess their change maturity might seem “immature” on the surface. But that doesn’t mean they lack the inherent capacity to change. In many cases, businesses have evolved and navigated transitions without formal change models in place, relying on their leadership, adaptability, and problem-solving capabilities.
Example: Mislabeling the Organisation’s Maturity
Consider a large, successful organisation with a history of navigating mergers, market shifts, and product innovation. While this company may have never formalised a change management function or assessed its change maturity, its survival and success prove that it has navigated complex changes in the past. You, as the change practitioner, might arrive and see that the business lacks a formal change methodology like Prosci or Kotter, so you label them as immature. As a result, you might start recommending a highly cautious, structured approach to “bring them up to speed.”
However, this label can lead to unnecessary delays. Rather than imposing new structures or over-engineering the process, it could be more effective to build on the organisation’s existing ways of working. The business may already have the right instincts, and simply needs to refine its approach to handle more formalised, larger-scale change efforts.
This cautious approach of assuming immaturity often leads to missed opportunities for progress. It slows down the pace of change and leaves businesses feeling that they are incapable of handling large-scale change without significant external help.
Change Terminology and Concepts: Over-Education vs. Practical Implementation
Another common pitfall is becoming too focused on educating stakeholders about change management concepts and frameworks, rather than focusing on practical implementation. It’s easy for experienced change practitioners to get caught up in explaining the intricacies of change theories, but the reality is that many stakeholders may not need or want this level of detail.
Stakeholders, especially those in senior leadership positions, are often more interested in results than in the underlying change management theories. Spending too much time educating them on ADKAR, Kotter’s 8-step process, or Lewin’s model can divert attention from the critical issue: how to implement the change in their specific organisational context.
Using and coaching your stakeholders on implementing change without change methodology is a skill, but one that can be critical.
Example: Change Concepts vs. Actionable Strategies
Imagine working on a digital transformation project where the leadership team is eager to see results. Instead of diving straight into how the change will be implemented, you spend the first few weeks educating the leaders on the theory behind change management, explaining why each stage of the ADKAR model is important and why a structured approach is necessary. While these concepts are valuable, the leadership team is left feeling overwhelmed by jargon and disconnected from the practicalities of the change they need to deliver.
A more effective approach in this situation might be to focus on practical, actionable strategies that are action-based learning. Instead of over-explaining change concepts, walk stakeholders through the steps they need to take, provide them with tools to manage resistance, and give them clear, real-time metrics on progress. In many cases, stakeholders don’t need an in-depth lesson on change theory—they need guidance on how to lead change within their teams, how to prepare and engage effectively, and how to overcome resistance.
Even if you don’t focus on education, and instead label them as change immature. This in itself can be dangerous and unhelpful. As a result you don’t implement the right approaches to support the change required to achieve their business goals.
While it’s essential to help stakeholders understand the principles behind change, overemphasis on theoretical knowledge can take the focus away from delivering the change itself.
Processes and Structures: Building New or Leveraging Existing?
One of the hallmarks of a maturing change organisation is the establishment of formal structures and processes to support change. Communities of practice, change champion networks, formalised governance bodies, and change management offices all play vital roles in building long-term change capability. However, there’s a risk of becoming too focused on building these structures rather than finding ways to work within the current framework of the organisation.
When faced with the task of improving change capability, many practitioners instinctively begin to build new structures from scratch. However, this can add complexity and create parallel processes that the business may not be equipped to handle. Sometimes, rather than introducing new structures, the better approach is to refine and optimise existing business processes and forums to embed change more naturally.
Example: Building New Structures vs. Leveraging Existing Ones
Consider an organisation that already has strong cross-functional governance in place for operational projects. Instead of introducing a new change champion network, you could work with the existing project governance structures to ensure change management principles are integrated into these meetings. By adapting existing forums to include change discussions, you avoid creating extra layers of complexity and leverage routines that are already familiar to the business.
The challenge is to balance the need for formal change structures with the desire to minimise disruption to current workflows. Often, the most effective approach is to enhance existing structures rather than building entirely new ones. This also helps to prevent the perception that change management is an “additional burden” rather than an integrated part of business operations.
‘Babying’ Your Stakeholders: Are You Doing the Change for Them?
As a change practitioner, it’s natural to want to help stakeholders navigate the complexities of change. But there’s a fine line between supporting your stakeholders and doing the change for them. When you step in to handle every aspect of the change process, you risk undermining your stakeholders’ ability to build their own change capability.
The goal of change management is to empower the business to manage change independently. If you are too involved in managing the change, you can inadvertently create dependency, where stakeholders rely on you to handle resistance, communications, or decision-making. This not only stifles their growth but also prevents the organisation from building a sustainable, internal capacity for change.
Example: Over-Involvement vs. Coaching for Capability Building
Suppose you’re leading a change initiative in a large organisation, and you find yourself handling most of the communications, solving problems that arise, and managing resistance from teams. While you may feel that you’re helping, the reality is that your stakeholders are becoming overly dependent on you to manage the change.
A more effective approach is to take a coaching stance. Rather than doing the change for them, help your stakeholders learn how to anticipate resistance, communicate effectively, and manage change within their teams. Offer guidance and support, but resist the temptation to take over. When you empower stakeholders to lead the change themselves, you help them build the confidence and skills they need to manage future changes more independently.
The key is to recognise when your involvement is crossing the line from support into doing the change for them. The more you can coach and mentor your stakeholders, the more resilient and capable the organisation will become.
Setting the Bar Too Low for Your Organisation
The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated something profound about people and organisations: they are capable of changing far more quickly than we might have thought. Practically overnight, organisations adapted to remote working, adopted new technologies, and restructured their operations. This rapid adaptation showed that many organisations have far more resilience and capacity for change than we often give them credit for.
But in the post-pandemic world, are you still setting the bar too low for your organisation? Are you approaching change cautiously because you assume the business is not capable of rapid adaptation? If so, you may be underestimating their ability to handle larger-scale change or more ambitious transformation initiatives.
Example: Underestimating Organisational Capacity
Imagine working with an organisation that wants to implement a large-scale digital transformation. You might assume that because the business has not undertaken such a significant change before, they will need to move cautiously, taking small steps toward change maturity. However, given the right leadership support, clear communication, and resources, the organisation might be able to implement the transformation far more quickly and effectively than anticipated.
The key is to challenge your assumptions about the organisation’s capacity for change. Instead of setting the bar too low and taking overly cautious steps, consider where you can stretch the organisation’s potential. Businesses often have far more adaptability and resilience than we might assume, and by aiming higher, you can help them achieve more ambitious outcomes. Again, COVID was a clear demonstration of what can be possible.
Caution vs. Progress: Finding the Right Balance
One of the biggest challenges for change practitioners is finding the right balance between caution and progress. In many cases, particularly with organisations that are newer to structured change management, a cautious approach may feel like the safest route. But taking overly cautious steps can prevent the organisation from achieving the level of change it needs to succeed.
The other side of the equation is pushing too hard, too fast. While organisations may have a greater capacity for change than we give them credit for, they also need time to adapt and build their change capability. The trick is to strike the right balance between ambitious progress and thoughtful pacing, especially iterative paced learning.
Example: Caution vs. Ambition in Portfolio-Level Change
Consider an organisation that is managing a portfolio of change initiatives. One approach is to take small, incremental steps to build change capability, slowly rolling out new processes and frameworks. While this approach may feel safe, it can prevent the business from keeping up with the volume and pace of change it needs to manage.
A more ambitious approach might involve embedding change management principles directly into business planning, governance, and decision-making. By integrating change management into existing processes, the organisation can manage a high volume of change more effectively without creating new silos or delays. This approach pushes the organisation to operate at a higher level, while still allowing time for adaptation and learning.
Adjusting Your Lens on Change Maturity
While change maturity is an important goal for any organisation, becoming too fixated on achieving it can inadvertently cloud your judgment and therefore negatively impact outcomes. Overemphasising change models, frameworks, and cautious steps can slow down the pace of change and underestimate the organisation’s capacity to evolve. As a change management practitioner, your role is not just to assess change maturity but to empower the organisation to grow and adapt.
By adjusting your lens and focusing on the organisation’s immediate needs and strengths, you can support more effective, sustainable change. This means balancing formal change processes with practical implementation, empowering stakeholders to lead the change themselves, and setting higher expectations for what the organisation can achieve.
The goal is not just to build change maturity, but to help the organisation experience navigating change in a way gives them confidence and meets their business goals.
In the world of change management, Go Lives are often seen as significant milestones. For many project teams, these events represent the culmination of months or even years of hard work, signaling that a new system, process, or initiative is officially being launched. It’s common for stakeholders to view Go Lives as a key indicator of the success of a change initiative. However, while Go Lives are undeniably important, relying on them as the primary measure of change impact can be misleading and potentially harmful to the overall change effort.
Go Lives are just one piece of the puzzle. Focusing too heavily on these milestones can lead to an incomplete understanding of the change process, neglecting crucial activities that occur both before and after Go Live. Let’s outline the risks associated with using Go Lives to report on change management impacts and offers best practices for a more holistic approach.
Go Lives: A Double-Edged Sword
Go Lives are naturally a focal point for project teams. They represent a clear, tangible goal, and the success of a Go Live can boost morale, validate the efforts of the team, and provide a sense of accomplishment. From a project delivery perspective, Go Lives are critical. They signal that the project has reached a level of maturity where it is ready to be released to the broader organization. In terms of resourcing and business readiness, Go Lives ensure that everything is in place for the new system or process to function as intended.
However, the very attributes that make Go Lives attractive can also make them problematic as indicators of change impact. The simplicity and clarity of a Go Live event can lead stakeholders to overestimate its significance, from a impacted business perspective. The focus on Go Lives can overshadow the complex and often subtle changes that occur before and after the event. While a successful Go Live is necessary for change, it is not sufficient to guarantee that the change will be successful in the long term.
The Pre-Go Live Journey: Laying the Foundation for Change
A significant portion of the change management journey occurs long before the Go Live date. During this pre-Go Live phase, various engagement and readiness activities take place that are critical to shaping the overall impact of the change. These activities include town hall meetings, where leaders communicate the vision and rationale behind the change, and briefing sessions that provide detailed information about what the change will entail.
Training and learning sessions are also a crucial component of the pre-Go Live phase. These sessions help employees acquire the necessary skills and knowledge to adapt to the new system or process. Discussions, feedback loops, and iterative improvements based on stakeholder input further refine the change initiative, ensuring it is better aligned with the needs of the organization.
These pre-Go Live activities are where much of the groundwork for successful change is laid. They build awareness, generate buy-in, and prepare employees for what is to come. Without these efforts, the Go Live event would likely be met with confusion, resistance, or outright failure. Therefore, it is essential to recognize that the impact of change is already being felt during this phase, even if it is not yet fully visible.
Post-Go Live Reality: The Real Work Begins
While the Go Live event marks a significant milestone, it is by no means the end of the change journey. In fact, for many employees, Go Live is just the beginning. It is in the post-Go Live phase that the true impact of the change becomes apparent. This is when employees start using the new system or process in their daily work, and the real test of the change’s effectiveness begins.
During this phase, the focus shifts from preparation to adoption. Employees must not only apply what they have learned but also adapt to any unforeseen challenges that arise. This period can be fraught with difficulties, as initial enthusiasm can give way to frustration if the change does not meet expectations or if adequate support is not provided.
Moreover, the post-Go Live phase is when the long-term sustainability of the change is determined. Continuous reinforcement, feedback, and support are needed to ensure that the change sticks and becomes embedded in the organization’s culture. Without these ongoing efforts, the change initiative may falter, even if the Go Live event was deemed a success.
The Risk of Misleading Stakeholders
One of the most significant dangers of focusing too heavily on Go Lives is the risk of misleading stakeholders. When stakeholders are led to believe that the Go Live event is the primary indicator of change impact, they may not fully appreciate the importance of the activities that occur before and after this milestone. This narrow focus can lead to a number of issues.
Firstly, stakeholders may prioritize the Go Live date to the exclusion of other critical activities. This can result in insufficient attention being paid to pre-Go Live engagement and readiness efforts or to post-Go Live adoption and support. As a consequence, the overall change initiative may suffer, as the necessary foundations for successful change have not been properly established.
Secondly, stakeholders may develop unrealistic expectations about the impact of the change. If they believe that the Go Live event will immediately deliver all the promised benefits, they may be disappointed when these benefits take longer to materialize. This can erode confidence in the change initiative and reduce support for future changes.
Finally, a narrow focus on Go Lives can create a false sense of security. If the Go Live event is successful, stakeholders may assume that the change is fully implemented and no further action is required. This can lead to complacency and a lack of ongoing support, which are essential for ensuring the long-term success of the change.
Best Practices for Reporting Change Management Impact
To avoid the pitfalls associated with relying on Go Lives as indicators of change impact, change management practitioners should adopt a more holistic approach to reporting. This involves considering the full scope of the change journey, from the earliest engagement activities to the ongoing support provided after Go Live. Here are some best practices for reporting on change management impact:
Integrate Pre-Go Live Metrics:
Track and report on engagement activities, such as attendance at town hall meetings, participation in training sessions, and feedback from employees.
Monitor changes in employee sentiment and readiness levels throughout the pre-Go Live phase.
Report on aggregate pan-initiative change initiative impost on business units, pre-Go Live
Emphasize Post-Go Live Support:
Develop metrics to measure the effectiveness of post-Go Live support, such as the number of help desk inquiries, employee satisfaction with the new system, and the rate of adoption.
Highlight the importance of continuous feedback loops to identify and address any issues that arise after Go Live.
Communicate the need for ongoing reinforcement and support to stakeholders, emphasizing that change is an ongoing process
Report on post-Go Live adoption time impost expected across initiatives
Provide a Balanced View of Change Impact:
Ensure that stakeholders understand that Go Live is just one part of the change journey and that significant impacts occur both before and after this event.
Use a combination of quantitative and qualitative data to provide a comprehensive view of change impact.
Regularly update stakeholders on progress throughout the entire change journey, not just at the time of Go Live.
Manage Expectations:
Clearly communicate to stakeholders that the full impact of the change may not be immediately visible at the time of Go Live.
Set realistic expectations about the timeline for realizing the benefits of the change.
Prepare stakeholders for potential challenges in the post-Go Live phase and emphasize the importance of ongoing support.
While Go Lives are important milestones in the change management process, they should not be used as the sole indicator of change impact. The journey to successful change is complex, involving critical activities before, during, and after the Go Live event. By adopting a more holistic approach to reporting on change management impact, practitioners can provide stakeholders with a more accurate understanding of the change journey, manage expectations more effectively, and ensure the long-term success of the change initiative.
The key takeaway is that change management is not just about delivering a project; it’s about guiding an organization through a journey of transformation. Go Lives are just one step in this journey, and it is the responsibility of leaders to ensure that every step is given the attention it deserves.
A lot of change practitioners are extremely comfortable with saying that change management is about attitudes, behaviours, and feelings and therefore we cannot measure them. After all, a big chunk of change folks are more interested in people than numbers. This metaphor that change management is ‘soft’ extends into areas such as leadership and employee engagement whereby it may not be easy to measure and track things. However, is it really that because something is harder to measure and less black and white that there is less merit in measuring these?
“If you can’t measure it you can’t improve it” Peter Drucker”
In today’s fast-paced business environment, measuring change is no longer about static reports or manual tracking. With advancements in AI and automation, organisations can now leverage real-time data analytics, predictive tools, and automated insights to manage change effectively. This guide explores how these technologies are reshaping the way we measure and manage change.
The ‘why’ behind a lot of industry changes in our day and age come from the fact that data is now dominating our world. Data is a central part of everything that is changing in our world. Since we are now more reliant on the internet for information, the data that can be collected through our digital interactions around our lives are now driving change.
Data and measurement is all around us. In fact our world would not exist without them. Without data and measurement our phones would not work, our home security features would not work, TV stations would not function, the internet would not be on, lifts would not work and even traffic lights would not work.
At the workplace, most corporate work functions and departments rely on data to run and manage the business. HR, Finance, Operations, Manufacturing, Risk, Procurement, IT, etc. The list goes on. In each of these departments data is an essential part of the day to day running of the function, without which the function cannot be run effectively. They would not know if the performance is hitting targets.
Now with AI, companies are focused on data at an even greater level more than ever. Without data, AI cannot work nor add value to organisations. The backbone of AI is the ability to access vast amounts of data so that this can be used to automate and help us with our lives.
So if our world is surrounded by data, why are we not measuring it in managing change? To answer this question let’s look at what we are or are not measuring.
Starting at a project level, these are some of the common ways in which change is often measured:
1. Change readiness surveys
Change readiness surveys are usually online surveys sent by a project owner to understand how stakeholder groups are feeling about the change at different points in time throughout the project. It can be in the form of a Likert scale or free text. Most results are summarized into a quantitative scale of the degree in which the group is ready for change. A simple SurveyMonkey or Microsoft Form could be set up to measure stakeholder readiness for change.
It used to be that change readiness surveys were quite long and wordy. Nowadays, a lot of change practitioners prefer to have shorter ‘pulse’ surveys as a way to regularly check on the stakeholder sentiments for readiness. However, shorter surveys could mean a lack of depth in the feedback you are receiving and limited data to use to pivot as necessary to address any concerns. So, you may find out if your stakeholders are ready for change, but not why. Ensure you balance ease and speed with insight and outcome.
The purpose of using change readiness surveys is to assess the stakeholders’ readiness for change. The results from the survey will definitely inform the levels of readiness. However, the survey itself may not be sufficient to conduct the assessment. Simply asking what stakeholders feel may not be a holistic way of assessing their readiness. To read more about conducting change readiness assessment strategically check out our article Beyond the Survey: A Strategic Lens on Change Readiness Assessment.
2. Training evaluation surveys
These evaluations are normally based on participant satisfaction across various categories such as content, instructor effectiveness, usefulness, etc. In a face-to-face training format, these surveys are normally paper-based so as to increase the completion rate. For online or virtual training, ratings may be completed by the user at the conclusion or after the session.
Considering that most organisations use virtual training formats, it is good practice to incorporate training evaluation at the conclusion of the session before the participants leave (after which it is almost impossible to get the satisfactory level of participant responses).
With the range of digital/AI-enabled tools on offer now, you can design training sessions in a way that requires much less and effort and gives you better results (to read more check out this link from Forbes). Some of these features include:
– gamifying training content to make it more engaging, interesting and fun
– easily creating micro-courses with little instructional design expertise
– incorporate a range of media such as videos and pictures with little effort
– using avatars as instructors to host the content
– easily create quizzes and assessments (check out Change Automator feature to conduct assessments)
3. Communications metrics
One way in which communications may be measured is the ‘hit rate’ or the number of users/audience that views the article/material/page. This may be easily tracked using Google Analytics which not only tracks the number of views per page but also viewership by the time of day/week as well as audience demographic information as such gender and geographical locations.
There is also a range of digital tools on offer to track the effectiveness of communication efforts. With Microsoft applications such as Yammer and Teams, there is already rich analytics capabilities on offer. These include user/group activity, device type usage, etc. Speak to your IT counterpart to access Microsoft Viva Engage which help you measure your community’s reach and engagement. You can find out more about the people, conversations, and questions & answers that make up your targeted communities.
There are also ways to A/B Test your communications message, whereby you have 2 different messages and test this with a smaller group fo audience to see which ones resonate or lead to more action. You can also create 2 different versions of the same intranet page and test messaging this way. When you have concluded the test you can then select the ‘winning’ version to the broader set of audience. Speak to your corporate communications colleague to get their help to implement this.
4. Employee sentiments/culture surveys
There are some organizations that measure employee sentiments or culture over the year and often there are questions that are linked to change. These surveys tend to be short and based on a Likert scale with fewer open-ended questions for qualitative feedback. Since these surveys are often sent across the entire organization they are a ‘catch-all’ yardstick and may not be specific to particular initiatives.
There is now a range of AI tools to do text and sentiment analysis if your survey contains text items. AI-powered tools now enable organisations to measure change through advanced metrics such as predictive capacity analysis to forecast resource strain, sentiment analysis to gauge stakeholder emotions in real time, and automated risk assessments that identify potential bottlenecks before they occur All the major technology providers such as Microsoft, Amazon and IBM already provide these tools (some are even free).
These are some of the ways you can use AI tools right now:
– detect a range of emotions such as anxiety, anger, and disgust and based on response statistics through sentiment analysis
– cluster topics based on key response themes
– identify any data anomalies that you may want to exclude
– identify and label tone of voice of the responses, and classification such as positive, neutral, negative
– analyse trends over time
Data analysis and reporting can also be easily leveraged with the range of digital tools on offer. Data analysis tools using AI can automated generate charts and dashboards for you with little effort. Change Automator contains rich survey features that do exactly this, including:
– Easily selecting chart type with one click
– Leverage from AI-suggested data insights
– Generate predictive trends based on existing data
– Easily share charts and dashboards using different ways, including using a URL link
5. Change heatmaps
Some organizations devise change heatmaps on excel spreadsheets to try and map out the extent to which different business units are impacted by change. This artifact speaks to the amount of change and often leads to discussions concerning the capacity that the business has to ‘handle/digest’ change. The problem with most heatmaps is that they are usually categorised and rated by the creator of the artifact (or a limited number of people making judgments), and therefore subject to bias. Data that is based on 1 person’s opinions also tend not to have as much weight in a decision-making forum.
In fact, we highly recommend that you don’t use change heat maps as the only way to track change volume. Instead, there is a range of other visuals such as bar charts, and timeline charts that are just as easy to interpret and are more insightful from a decision-making perspective.
Heatmaps are also by design categorical and not particularly precise. It may be useful at a high level for understanding hot spots, but not one to use to make specific decisions concerning business capacity levels and corresponding challenges.
The following is an example of a Change heatmap that uses the standard red, amber green traffic light coding scheme. This may play into the psychological bias of your audience interpreting red as bad and only focus on ‘alleviating’ the red.
6. Change initiative benefit tracking
In addition to typical change management measures, there are various initiatives-specific measures that focus on the actual outcome and benefit of the change with the goal of determining to what extent the change has taken place. Some examples of this include:
System usage rates
Cost reduction
Revenue increase
Transaction speed
Process efficiency
Speed of decision-making
Customer satisfaction rate
Employee productivity rate
Incidents of process violation
Example: Project based change management dashboard from Change Automator
Non-initiative based change management measures
There are two other measures that are used within an organizational vs. initiative-specific context, change leadership assessment and change maturity assessment. In the next section, we will discuss these two areas.
Change leadership assessment
David Miller from Changefirst wrote about 3 types of change leaders.:
1. The sponsor whose role is to drive the initiative to success from the beginning to the end. This involves possessing competencies in rallying and motivating people, building a strong network of sponsors, and communicating clearly to various stakeholder groups.
2. The influencer whose role is to leverage their network and influence to market and garner the traction required to make the initiative successful. Four types of influencers as identified by Changefirst includes:
a) Advocates who are great at promoting and advocating the benefits of the change
b) Connectors who are able to link and leverage people across a part of the organization to support the change
c) Controllers who have control over access to information and people and these could include administrators and operations staff
d) Experts who are viewed by others in the organization as being technically credible
3. The change agent is someone who is tasked with supporting the overall change in various ways, including any promotional activities, gaging different parts of the organization on the change and be able to influence, up, down and sideways across the organization to drive a successful change outcome. Some call this the ‘change champion’. They can be your key to influencing across the organisation.
Whilst there isn’t one industry standard tool for assessing change leadership competencies and capabilities. There are various change leadership assessment tools offered by Changefirst as well as other various smaller consulting firms. Some of the ways in which you can assess change leadership may include categories such as Goal Attainment, Flexibility, Decision Making, and Relationship Building.
Some of the key competencies critical in change leadership have been called out by Pagon & Banutal (2008), and include:
Goal attainment
Assessing organizational culture and climate
Change implementation
Motivating and influencing others
Adaptability
Stakeholder management
Collaboration
Build organizational capacity and capability for change
Maneuvering around organizational politics
There is a range of change leadership assessment offerings from various consulting firms. Whichever one you choose, ensure that it is not overly simplistic and not ‘tested’ and therefore not reliable. Assessments will only be useful if they have gone through the rigour of being tested, with the results showing that they are reliable can be trusted. Anyone can ‘invent’ a simple survey with various leadership categories, but this does not mean they are actually valid. Afterall, if you are asking your leaders to spend time to fill in an assessment survey, you want to be confident that the outcome of the assessment will provide sufficient insight.
Change maturity assessment
Organisations are increasingly realising that managing change initiative by initiative is no longer going to cut it as it does not enable organizational learning and growth. Initiatives come and go and those who rely on contractor change managers often find that their ability to manage change as an organization does not mature much across initiatives, especially across time.
Change maturity assessment is focused on building change capability across the organization across different dimensions, whether it be project change management, operational change or change leadership. The goal of conducting a change maturity assessment is to identify areas in which there may be a capability gap and therefore enable structured planning to close this gap. The meaning of ‘capability’ does not just refer to people skills, but also to process and system capabilities.
Change maturity assessment results may prompt focus and action to improve change management capabilities if used in the right channels to influence the leadership and the business.
There are 2 major change maturity assessment models available in the market. The first is by Prosci and the second is by the Change Management Institute (CMI). Read up more about CMI’s Organisational Change Maturity Model here. To read more about change maturity assessment read out article A New Guide for Improving Change Management Maturity, where we outline how to improve change maturity throughout different business units across the organization.
A comprehensive model of Change Management Measures
In this diagram various change management measures are represented along two axes, one being the different phases of the initiative lifecycle, and the other being different organizational levels of project, business and enterprise in which change management measures fall into.
In the broad initiative phases of Plan, Execute and Realise there are various change measurements and assessments that may be applicable. At the Business and Enterprise levels, these measurements and assessments are not so much split according to initiative phases. Instead, they may be conducted periodically, for example change capacity and impost tracking may be done on a monthly basis, with change maturity assessment conducted at an annual basis.
Project level measures
1. ‘Plan’ phase
In this phase of the project, the team is discovering and scoping what the project involves and what the change is. As a result, the details are not known clearly at the commencement of the phase. Later in the phase the scope becomes much clearer and the team starts to plan what activities are required to implement the change.
The change complexity assessment evaluates how complex the project is. It looks at how many people could be impacted, what the size of the impact could be, how many business units are impacted, whether multiple systems and processes are impacted, etc.
Change resourcing costing. At the planning phase of the project cost required for the change management stream of the work is required. This includes such as any contractors, communication campaigns, learning cost, travel, and administration cost, just to name a few.
Change readiness assessment is usually conducted prior to the change and during the change. Usually, the same set of questions is asked of various stakeholder groups to assess their readiness for change.
2. ‘Execute’ phase
The execute phase is one of the most critical parts of the project. Activities are in full flight and the project is busy iterating and re-iterating changes to ensure successful execution to achieve project goals.
Communication and engagement tracking. Effective engagement of stakeholders in the change is absolutely critical. Stakeholder interviews, surveys, communication readership rates are all ways in which engagement may be tracked.
Learning tracking. Measuring learning is critical since it tracks to what extent the new competencies and skills have been acquired through learning interventions. Typical measurements include course tests or quizzes in addition to course evaluations. On the job performance may also be used to track learning outcomes and to what extent learning has been applied in the work setting.
Change readiness assessment continues to be critical to track during the execution phase of the project
3. ‘Realise’ phase
In this phase of the project the change has ‘gone live’ and most project activities have been completed. It is anticipated in this phase that the ‘change’ occurs and that the benefits can then be tracked and measured.
Change benefit tracking measures and tracks the extent to which the targeted benefits and outcomes have been achieved. Some of these measures may be ‘hard’ quantitative measures whilst others may be ‘soft’ measures that are more behavioural.
Business level measures
Business level measures are those that measure to what extent the business has the right ability, capacity, and readiness for the change.
Change heatmaps can help to visualize which part of the business is most impacted by 1 project or multiple projects. The power of the change heatmap is in visualizing which part of the business is the most impacted, and to compare the relative impacts across businesses. As the number of change initiatives increase so would the complexity of the change. When facing this situation organisations need to graduate from relying on excel spreadsheets to using more sophisticated data visualization tools to aid data-based decision making. To read more about change heatmaps and why this is not the only way to understand business change impact, go to The Death of the Change Heatmap.
Sponsor readiness/capability assessment can be a critical tool to help identify any capability gaps in the sponsor so that effort may be taken to support the sponsor. A strong and effective sponsor can make or break a change initiative. Early engagement and support of the sponsor are critical. Both Prosci, as well as Changefirst, have sponsor competency assessment offerings.
Change champion capability assessment. Change champion or change agent are critical ‘nodes’ in which to drive and support change within the organizational network. A lot of change champions are appointed only for one particular initiative. Having a business-focus change champion network means that their capability can be developed over time, and they can support multiple initiatives and not just one. Assessing and supporting change champion capability would also directly translate to better change outcomes.
Change leadership and change maturity assessment – refer to the previous section
Change capacity assessment.
In an environment where there is significant change happening concurrently, careful planning and sequencing of change in balance with existing capacity are critical. There are several aspects of change capacity that should be called out in the measurement process:
1. Different parts of the business can have different capacity for change. Those parts of the business with better change capability, and perhaps with better change leadership, are often able to receive and digest more changes than other businesses that do not possess the same level of capability.
2. Some businesses are much more time-sensitive and therefore their change capacity needs to be measured with more granularity. For example, call centre staff capacity is often measured in terms of minutes. Therefore, to effectively plan for their change capacity, the impacts of change needs to be quantified and articulated in a precise, time-bound context so that effective resourcing can be planned in advance.
3. The change tolerance or change saturation level for business needs careful measurement in combination with operational feedback to determine. For example, it could be that last month a part of the business experienced significant change impact across several initiatives happening at the same time. The operational indicators were that there was some impact on customer satisfaction, productivity, and there were negative sentiments reported by staff that there was too much change to handle. This could mean that the change tolerance level may have been exceeded. With the right measurement of change impact levels for that part of the business, next time this level of change is seen, previous lessons may be utilized to plan for this volume of change. Utilise measurement and data visualization tools such as the Change Compass to track change capacity.
AI-driven systems such as Change Compass can now detect change saturation hotspots across teams or departments by analysing workload data in real time. These systems also provide actionable recommendations on how to sequence or prioritise initiatives to minimise disruption while maximising performance outcomes.
Enterprise level change measures
At an enterprise level, many of the business unit level measures are still applicable. However, the focus is comparing across different business units to sense-make what each part of the business is going through and if the overall picture is aligned with the intentions and the strategic direction of the organization. For example, typical questions include:
Is it surprising that one part of the business is undergoing significant change whilst another is not?
Is there a reason that one business unit is focused on a few very large changes whilst for other business units there is a larger set of changes each with smaller impacts?
Is the overall pace of change optimum according to strategic intent? Does it need to speed up or slow down?
What is the process to govern, report and make decisions on enterprise level change, prioritization, sequencing and benefit realization?
Is there one business unit that is able to manage change more effectively, faster with greater outcomes? How can other business units leverage any internal best practices?
As mentioned in the Change Management Measures diagram, some enterprise level change measures include:
Change capacity assessment – Does one business unit’s change capacity limits mean that we are not able to execute on a critical strategy within the allocated time? How do we create more capacity? Ways in which to create more capacity could include more resources such as staff, or initiative funding, more time is given, or more talent to lead initiatives
Change maturity assessment – At an enterprise level, the concern is with the overall change maturity of the organization. How do we implement enterprise level interventions to build change maturity through programs, networks, and exchanges, such as:
Enterprise change capability programs
Enterprise change analytics and measurement tools
Enterprise change methodology
Enterprise network of change champions
Strategy impact map – Change management need not be focused only on project execution or business unit capability. It can also demonstrate value at an enterprise level by focusing on strategy execution (which by definition is change). The way in which different strategies exert impact on various business units may be visualized to help stakeholder understand which initiatives within which strategic intent impact which business units. To illustrate this please refer to the below diagram which is an example of a strategy impact map. In this diagram, each of the organisation’s strategy is displayed with different initiatives branching out of each strategy. The width of each initiative correlates with the level of impact that the initiative has on the business over a pre-determined period of time. Therefore, the width of each strategy also indicates the overall relative impact on the business.
Example: Change management dashboard from The Change Compass
This data visualization artifact can be valuable for business leaders and strategic planning functions as it depicts visually how the implementation of various strategies is impacting business units. This helps planners to better understand strategy implementation impacts, potential risks and opportunities, and balancing change pace with strategy goals at various points in time.
Predictive indicators on business performance – We started this article talking about how data is all around us and we also need to better manage change using data. With quantitative data on change impact, it is possible to ascertain any correlations with operational business indicators such as customer satisfaction, service availability, etc. For those business indicators where there is a significant correlation, it is possible to hence use predictive reporting to forecast performance indicator trends, given planned change impacts.
In the below graph you can see an example of this whereby using historical data it is possible to establish correlations and therefore forecast future impact on business indicators. This example is focused on the customer contact centre (CCC) and key business indicator of average handling time (AHT) is utilized as an illustration.
This type of predictive performance forecasting is extremely valuable for organisations undergoing significant change and would like to understand how change may impact their business performance. By demonstrating the impact on business indicators, this puts the importance of managing change at the front and centre of the decision-making table. At The Change Compass, we are developing this type of measurement and reporting function. This is the frontier for change management – to be established as a key business-driving function (versus a standard back-office function).
With AI-powered platforms, stakeholders can now ask natural language questions like ‘What is the current adoption rate of Initiative X?’ or ‘Which teams are at risk of exceeding their capacity?’ Platforms such as Change Compass provide instant answers backed by real-time data analysis, saving time and enhancing decision-making accuracy.
Example: Using natural language query with The Change Compass
Change can be measured and this article has outlined various operational and strategic ways in which change measurement can demonstrate significant value. Most corporate functions cannot exist without data and analytics. For example, Human Resources relies on people and pay data. Marketing cannot function without measurement of channel and campaign effectiveness. For Information Technology, pretty much everything is measured from system usage, to cost, to efficiency. It is time we start utilizing data to better visualize change to better plan and make business decisions.
Have a chat with us if you are looking for ways to streamline how you capture, visualise data for decisions, and leverage AI to easily generate insights. This includes the ability to easily do forecasting, ask data questions using natural language and get instant answers.
The role of change managers has been left out of the various agile methodologies. This is even though most fully acknowledge the importance of change management in the success of initiatives. Does this mean that the agile teams should and can take on the role of change managers? While most of you reading this article may have change practitioners in the organisations, there are plenty of organisations that run agile teams without change managers in the team.
Is it that in agile environments, change management responsibilities are distributed across team members rather than centralised in a single role? After all the agile team is self-organising and has shared accountability?
For organisations that do not have change managers in agile teams, they are still able to deliver valuable and continuous changes. The difference is in how effective the agile team is in delivering a solution where:
A range of stakeholders are continuously engaged effectively and therefore have high levels of readiness
Stakeholders’ readiness for the pace and design of agile is taken into account and various education/engagement sessions are designed as required
They’re able to identify the various behavioural changes required in fully adopting the change
Stakeholders continuously track and reinforce adoption
The team is aware of the change landscape of impacted stakeholders and can work with them respectively to design and deliver in a way that maximises adoption in a targeted way
It is quite difficult for a small agile team to have all these skillsets. You can equally place the same argument for Business Analysts. Even if the team does not have this role, they could equally undertake a lot of the tasks that a Business Analyst would typically undertake in an agile project, however, maybe not at the same level of professionalism and rigor.
In a small agile team of cross-functional specialists, by design each member is a specialist in his/her functional domain, whether it is testing, software development, operations, etc. It would be rare for a domain specialist to have such a breadth of skillsets to include a range of change management skills. Of course, this is not impossible, but difficult for a team to possess.
An agile team is by design focused on delivering. By design, the agile team is laser-focused on its iteration work and delivering to the schedule at the right quality. It does not have a lot of capacity to devote itself to working with a wide range of stakeholders as a result. The change manager, on the other hand, is by design focused on the world of the stakeholders as well as what the agile team is delivering and designing a series of steps for the changes to take place or a people and organisational perspective.
Moreover, beyond project change management skills, organisations that have a myriad of self-organising agile teams require greater air-traffic control at a portfolio and enterprise level. Whilst this may be fulfilled from a portfolio management perspective, attention should also be paid to change portfolio management. Within a fast-paced change environment, the capacity stakeholders across the organisation have for the changes, and the overall prioritisation and sequencing for these changes are paramount.
Without this, changes may fall off the radar, superseded by other competing changes delivered by other agile teams. Alternatively, change saturation fatigue may be a result. In fact, there is increasing evidence that this is prevalent across organisations. Stakeholders’ capacity for change is limited and must be managed effectively to ensure the right changes are adopted.
If change management so critical to agile changes let’s delve into the essential role that change managers play within agile teams, breaking down their contributions across the four typical phases of an agile initiative: Define, Build, Test, and Deploy.
Define Phase
During the Define phase, agile teams lay the groundwork for the project by identifying objectives, scope, and initial requirements. For change managers, this phase is critical for assessing the scope and complexity of the change and determining the necessary resources and support structures.
Key Activities for Change Managers in the Define Phase:
1. Assessing Change Size and Complexity: Change managers evaluate the magnitude of the change and its potential impact on various parts of the organization. This assessment helps in tailoring change management strategies to address specific needs.
2. Resource Planning: Identifying the required business and change support resources is essential. This includes assembling a team of change champions, communication specialists, and trainers who will help facilitate the change.
3. Strategic Planning: Developing a comprehensive plan that outlines key activities and tactics to engage stakeholders and drive successful change. This plan acts as a roadmap for the entire change management process.
Build Phase
In the Build phase, agile teams start developing the solution. Change managers intensify their efforts to understand the potential impacts of the change and begin engaging stakeholders.
Key Activities for Change Managers in the Build Phase:
1. Detailed Stakeholder Assessments: Conducting thorough assessments to identify how different stakeholders will be affected by the change. Understanding these impacts is crucial for tailoring communication and training efforts.
2. Initiating Stakeholder Engagement: Early engagement with stakeholders to communicate the vision, goals, and expected outcomes of the change. This engagement helps in building awareness and buy-in from the outset.
3. Scenario Planning: Since the exact nature of the change may not be fully defined, change managers work with various scenarios to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities. This flexibility allows for adaptive communication and engagement strategies.
Test Phase
The Test phase is where agile teams validate the solution through testing and feedback. For change managers, this phase is pivotal for ensuring stakeholders are prepared for the upcoming changes.
Key Activities for Change Managers in the Test Phase:
1. Collaborating on Testing Processes: Working closely with agile teams to determine how stakeholders can be involved in testing. This may include business testers, change champions, or end-users who provide valuable feedback.
2. Designing Communication Content and Learning Interventions: Developing and rolling out communication materials and training programs to prepare stakeholders for the change. These interventions are tailored based on feedback from testing.
3. Engaging Stakeholders Through Various Channels: Utilizing demos, team briefings, and other engagement channels to keep stakeholders informed and involved throughout the testing process.
Deploy Phase
The Deploy phase marks the transition of the solution into the live environment. Change managers play a crucial role in ensuring a smooth transition and full adoption of the change.
Key Activities for Change Managers in the Deploy Phase:
1. Ensuring Readiness: Before deployment, change managers gather evidence that stakeholders are ready for the change. This involves assessing training completion, communication effectiveness, and overall preparedness.
2. Executing Engagement Strategies: During deployment, change managers leverage various engagement channels to support the transition. This includes continued communication, support hotlines, and face-to-face interactions to address any concerns.
3. Monitoring and Feedback: Establishing performance metrics to monitor the adoption and effectiveness of the change. Feedback is collected and analyzed to make necessary adjustments and integrate the change into business-as-usual operations.
Key Differences in Change Management for Agile Teams
While the core principles of change management remain consistent, their application within agile teams introduces unique challenges and opportunities. Here are some key differences:
Proactive Integration in Cross-Functional Teams
Change managers actively contribute to the progress of agile teams by embedding themselves within the cross-functional team structure. This close collaboration ensures that change management activities are aligned with the development process, allowing for more effective and timely interventions.
Flexibility and Adaptation
In agile environments, the content and nature of changes may evolve throughout the project lifecycle. Change managers must remain flexible, working with scenarios and adaptable communication strategies to respond to shifting requirements and stakeholder needs.
Continuous Feedback and Engagement
Ongoing stakeholder engagement and continuous feedback are cornerstones of effective change management in agile teams. Regular check-ins, feedback loops, and open communication channels help to identify and address concerns early, ensuring smoother transitions and higher adoption rates.
Iterative Planning and Adjustment
The iterative nature of agile projects necessitates continuous review and adjustment of change management plans. Change managers must be prepared to tweak strategies, update communication materials, and refine training programs based on real-time feedback and evolving project dynamics.
Practical Tips for Change Managers in Agile Teams
1. Embed Yourself in the Team: Become an integral part of the agile team to gain a deeper understanding of the project dynamics and build strong relationships with team members.
2. Embrace Flexibility: Be prepared to pivot and adapt your change management strategies as the project evolves. Flexibility is key to staying relevant and effective. Come up with scenarios such as communication materials and engagement tactics as needed.
3. Drive Proactive Open Communication: Create an environment where stakeholders feel comfortable sharing feedback and concerns. This openness will help you address issues promptly and maintain trust. Note that stakeholders may need learning interventions to truly understand and adjust to agile ways of working.
4. Leverage Data and Metrics: Use data and performance metrics to monitor the effectiveness of your change management efforts. Data does not just apply to the rest of the agile team. Change management data is no less valuable. This will help you make informed decisions and demonstrate the value of your work. To read more about how to measure change check out our practical guide here.
5. Continuous Stakeholder Engagement: Engage with stakeholders early and often. Building strong relationships and maintaining regular communication will increase the likelihood of successful change adoption.
6. Understand the Change Landscape: Since the change manager’s role is to adopt a people lens, it is critical to see from the impacted stakeholder’s perspective the range of changes they are or will be going through. Change that is designed in a vacuum will not be successful.
Change managers play a pivotal role in the success of agile teams, ensuring that changes are effectively adopted and integrated into the organization. By understanding the unique dynamics of agile projects and adopting flexible, proactive, and iterative approaches, change managers can significantly enhance the readiness and adoption of changes. Their efforts not only support the agile team but also drive the overall success of the organization in navigating an increasingly intense landscape of changes.
